Simping For Hina Posted September 30, 2011 Report Share Posted September 30, 2011 [img]http://i1095.photobucket.com/albums/i465/DeathlyFiend/Gaga.png[/img] [img]http://i1095.photobucket.com/albums/i465/DeathlyFiend/DontCallMeGaga.png[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:Blu:. Posted September 30, 2011 Report Share Posted September 30, 2011 Too dark and the light source is a bit annoying when the BG is that dark IMO. Render and BG looks a bit LQ. C4Ds doesn't flow very well with the tag. Text's pretty cool, though also kinda LQ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simping For Hina Posted September 30, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 30, 2011 Render? Hahah no. Light source was to be a camera flash. Stock was LQ from the beginning :/ I can easily change the position of the second C4D. I like the first one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:Blu:. Posted September 30, 2011 Report Share Posted September 30, 2011 Oh so the stock was already LQ, well Dae.... GET A BETTER STOCK D:{ lol, camera flash looks like some above head light source xP When you say the first render do you mean the one her left? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simping For Hina Posted September 30, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 30, 2011 I'll fix and make a new one. Yes the one on the left! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:Blu:. Posted September 30, 2011 Report Share Posted September 30, 2011 Personally, I think the C4D on Gaga's left can be a bit of a distraction because of the red on it. It takes away the focus on the stock, but that's just me and if you feel it works then more power to ya Dae! This is my first actual CnC, really I don't think I can make anything better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simping For Hina Posted September 30, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 30, 2011 The right would be more distracting by far. I don't think the left is that bad in placement. Lighting obviously needs work and of course, the stock is LQ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twenty-five Zero Oh-oh Posted September 30, 2011 Report Share Posted September 30, 2011 Watch your quality and contrast. These tags may benefit from a solid dark red layer on lighten only. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simping For Hina Posted September 30, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 30, 2011 Quality is more because of the stocks used. But, I might try that, thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted September 30, 2011 Report Share Posted September 30, 2011 [quote name='Twenty-five Zero Oh-oh' timestamp='1317417798' post='5550606'] Watch your quality and contrast. These tags may benefit from a solid dark red layer on lighten only. [/quote] You really don't know how right this is :3 Stick one of those on, immediate progress. I think the problem is that they are waay too burnt out and way too saturated. Quickly fix it by lowering saturation and contrast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twenty-five Zero Oh-oh Posted September 30, 2011 Report Share Posted September 30, 2011 lol. While I agree with the fact that they are too burn out, IMO saturation is fine. Just remember that pure black and extremely near black and extremely near white generally doesn't work, particularly for this kinda style. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted September 30, 2011 Report Share Posted September 30, 2011 Burnt out usually means too dark and too saturated. Human perception usually first recognizes the darkness, but a lot of burnt-outness comes the fact that it's over saturated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.