Garthfunkle Vii Backwards Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 Xyz uses 2 monsters with the same lv to make 1 monsters who rank is equal to the lv of the 2 monsters my idea is Zyx zyx uses 1 monsters who level is not equal to the 2 monsters you trying to make example you have a face up lv 8 monster on your side of the field you can give up that 1 monster to make 2 Zyx monsters 1 of the Zyx monster are over laid the lv 8 monster </p> but the best part when you used the over laid unit it doesnt go to the graveyard it simply transfer to the other Zyx monster when one Zyx monster is removed from the field so is the other Zyx monster Zyx monster use xeno orbs instead of lv or rank 1st Zyx monster xeno 3 dark fiend 1 lv 6 monster once per turn you can transfer 1 Zyx material to anthor face up Zyx monster on your side of the field to special summon 1 lv 3 or lower monster, the monster special summon by this card's original ATK is double until the en Link to comment
DARKPLANT RISING Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 First speak proper English and we'll start taking you seriously. Also, it lacks originality, a creative name, everything. In fact "Zxy" is sorta the stupidest naming I've heard. Link to comment
Garthfunkle Vii Backwards Posted September 16, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 i do speak proper english 2nd the part sort gives the idea on how Zyx is the exact oppiste of Xyz granted not super original but if this idea is uncool and unoriginal why didnt think of it before me my advice LEARN TO CHILL darkplant Link to comment
DARKPLANT RISING Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 [quote name='Herman The German' timestamp='1316169463' post='5518022'] i do speak proper english 2nd the part sort gives the idea on how Zyx is the exact oppiste of Xyz granted not super original but if this idea is uncool and unoriginal why didnt think of it before me my advice LEARN TO CHILL darkplant [/quote] Honestly, I'm always chilling. I just say I'm annoyed and that's it. I didn't think of this before you, but that's because it's not really worth the effort to think. You can just reverse every single mechanic in the game and build an archetype around it, but only several can be considered original. If you don't wanna annoy people, go for more original ideas. Link to comment
Garthfunkle Vii Backwards Posted September 16, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 [quote name='Darkplant - PAIN' timestamp='1316170327' post='5518042'] Honestly, I'm always chilling. I just say I'm annoyed and that's it. I didn't think of this before you, but that's because it's not really worth the effort to think. You can just reverse every single mechanic in the game and build an archetype around it, but only several can be considered original. If you don't wanna annoy people, go for more original ideas. [/quote] i have made more original ideas but the topic never last but i think this idea could improve the game alot Link to comment
Premier Alexander Romanov Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 It's not a battle. Because Xyzs win by default. Because your card doesn't make sense. Link to comment
NumberCruncher Posted September 17, 2011 Report Share Posted September 17, 2011 [quote name='Herman The German' timestamp='1316209132' post='5518970'] i have made more original ideas but the topic never last but i think this idea could improve the game alot[/quote] Though Darkplant does have a point. Your idea lacks imagination and creativity. You clearly haven't thought this through, as it can make any given monster a +1 without warning. Plus you wrote your proposition in such an unappealing way that we really can't get into your idea. Link to comment
Garthfunkle Vii Backwards Posted September 17, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 17, 2011 [quote name='NumberCruncher' timestamp='1316228492' post='5519650'] Though Darkplant does have a point. Your idea lacks imagination and creativity. You clearly haven't thought this through, as it can make any given monster a +1 without warning. Plus you wrote your proposition in such an unappealing way that we really can't get into your idea. [/quote] what doesnt make sense 1 monster becomes 2 when one of the new monster is removed from the field so does the other one and the 2 new monster share the overlaid unit instead of the overlaid unit being sent to the graveyard Link to comment
Premier Alexander Romanov Posted September 17, 2011 Report Share Posted September 17, 2011 Yeah...I couldn't follow that. Könnten Sie bitte Englisch sprechen? Link to comment
Garthfunkle Vii Backwards Posted September 18, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 18, 2011 [quote name='Reina Soho' timestamp='1316273569' post='5520391'] Yeah...I couldn't follow that. Könnten Sie bitte Englisch sprechen? [/quote] example you have a face up blue eyes white dragon on your side of the field you can give up your face up blue eyes white dragon for 2 xeno 4 Zyx monsters if 1 of your Zyx monster is removed from the field the other one is removed from the field as well when you Zyx Summon the monster (in the example blue eyes white dragon is overlaid (overlaid = Zyx Materail)) when you use the Zyx Materail it is transfered to the other face up Zyx monster on your side of the field INSTEAD OF going to the graveyard Link to comment
Tentacruel Posted September 18, 2011 Report Share Posted September 18, 2011 This... doesn't make any sense. Link to comment
Premier Alexander Romanov Posted September 18, 2011 Report Share Posted September 18, 2011 That still doesn't make any sense. Come back in a year when you can speak this language properly. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.