Glorious eXcess Posted February 16, 2008 Report Share Posted February 16, 2008 ok, title says all: please rate, etc. etc oh, right.....the pic is by wolfberserker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeroshot Posted February 16, 2008 Report Share Posted February 16, 2008 I don't know much about gb s but it does not resemble the normal effect of them the pic is not of an animal but of a human OCG miswordings 5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glorious eXcess Posted February 16, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 16, 2008 that isn;t true......test ape and tiger are both GB cards, and the effect is standard....i run gladiators....true abotu the pic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeroshot Posted February 16, 2008 Report Share Posted February 16, 2008 Im just sayin the 3 gladiaters i got say somthin like, if this card attacked or was attacked blah blah blah blah blah do something awesome with a card blah blah blah........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killey Posted February 16, 2008 Report Share Posted February 16, 2008 I would call this a Gladiator Beast Support Card rather than a Gladiator Beast itself. Change the name to something other than Gladiator Beast and it would work better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted February 16, 2008 Report Share Posted February 16, 2008 Wow, he could bust a field of Cyber Dragon and 4 Scapegoats! There are some OCG errors, and it's not exactly Gladiator-esque. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dongaboy Posted February 16, 2008 Report Share Posted February 16, 2008 I relly hategladiator beastsbut for ur effort9.6/10-.4 cuz i hate gladiator beasts sorry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killey Posted February 16, 2008 Report Share Posted February 16, 2008 It couldn't clear the field of Cyber Dragons in 1 turn but it could definitely wipe out Scapegoats. According to the card text you have to halve it's ATK in order for it to ATK again. The creator should put a limit to how many times you can do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glorious eXcess Posted February 16, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 16, 2008 um, you mean me......it has no limit to attack, except 2200-1100-550-275----so 4 times.....hey, it could rid of scapegoats...hehehe thats strong....but he cant attack directly, so, he can't do killer damage ~(2200+1100+550+275=*does math*4025 damage....though that would be nice)\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kid Posted February 16, 2008 Report Share Posted February 16, 2008 uh....8.53948736847/10 *i had no idea were i got the extra numbers* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted February 16, 2008 Report Share Posted February 16, 2008 It couldn't clear the field of Cyber Dragons in 1 turn but it could definitely wipe out Scapegoats. According to the card text you have to halve it's ATK in order for it to ATK again. The creator should put a limit to how many times you can do that.It has 2200 ATK... Cyber Dragon has 2100. It could technically attack infinitely, but bleh. ALSO: I never said that was good, but it gives you an idea of what this could be used for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captainrex0012 Posted February 16, 2008 Report Share Posted February 16, 2008 gladiator beasts are supposed to be animals and their names are supposed to be of greek origin and the halve atk to attack again should be you can only Atk again one extra time in addition to its normal attack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killey Posted February 16, 2008 Report Share Posted February 16, 2008 It couldn't clear the field of Cyber Dragons in 1 turn but it could definitely wipe out Scapegoats. According to the card text you have to halve it's ATK in order for it to ATK again. The creator should put a limit to how many times you can do that.It has 2200 ATK... Cyber Dragon has 2100. It could technically attack infinitely' date=' but bleh. ALSO: I never said that was good, but it gives you an idea of what this could be used for.[/quote'] Sorry, I misread your post and thought you wrote a field full of Cyber Dragons or a field of 4 scapegoats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Supreme Posted February 16, 2008 Report Share Posted February 16, 2008 7.3/10 good work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glorious eXcess Posted February 16, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 16, 2008 yaya!thankz guys..... let me clarify....i dot care about the name too much...though i should change the ame a littte, Like, uhh "Cyber Gladiator Assassin" or sumting Ok, my dude attax a cyber dragon, it destroys it.....ok, he can attack again with only 1100 Atk now, just barely destroying a level 3, the 550 ATK, barely destoying, if not, a level 2 or 1, and finally, 275 ATK....HE CANNOT INFLICT DIRECT BATTLE DAMAGE>>>SO EVEN IF THE WAS ONLY 1 CYBER DRAGON, HE COULDN'T ATTACK DIRECTLY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted February 16, 2008 Report Share Posted February 16, 2008 doesnt represent a GB., how do i know? i used to own a GB deck. effect deosnt look too much like that of a GB. 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glorious eXcess Posted February 16, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 16, 2008 meh, i understand that....read post above yours.... and i run a GB CB deck as well, and a stall deck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wilson91 Posted February 16, 2008 Report Share Posted February 16, 2008 Well overall, good effort. The problems with this are it doesn't look like a GB and the effect doesn't look like an original GB one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glorious eXcess Posted February 16, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 16, 2008 ahhhahhahhahahhahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh i know, but thanks for keeping the thread alive, and adding to your post count Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kizzi Posted February 16, 2008 Report Share Posted February 16, 2008 Not a Gladiator Beast due to name and image.I would recommend "Test Cyborg"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucas Maximus Posted February 16, 2008 Report Share Posted February 16, 2008 There are various OCG errors but still nice idea and attempt. ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glorious eXcess Posted February 16, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 16, 2008 thankz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon God Posted February 16, 2008 Report Share Posted February 16, 2008 it's okay but i think a gldiator baest has to be an animal doesn't it, 7/10 for the effort. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glorious eXcess Posted February 16, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 16, 2008 ugghhhh....fine....ill change it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.