Headmaster Monokuma Posted August 21, 2011 Report Share Posted August 21, 2011 [quote name='Ravenous Black' timestamp='1313953615' post='5459780'] That whole gorup, sans Dark and Rumisiel, changed their names. [/quote] Gonna be changing my name to Twilight Sparkle next name change actually. Rumisiel is cool, but still. Card is terrible, therefore I want to make a deck based around it now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted August 21, 2011 Report Share Posted August 21, 2011 [quote name='Armadilloz' timestamp='1313952339' post='5459719'] Despite the fact Orichalcos Hula-Hoop-Expert was geared to Normal monsters, I actually find it's effect to be pretty neat. ....Despite the fact his ATK will hardly ever be above 2000, let alone last longer then [b]10. Seconds. Flat.[/b] [/quote] Fixed for reference xD but I also agree with the content. [quote name='Armadilloz' timestamp='1313953803' post='5459795'] Smeargle and Bullet Monkey from the GFX section aswell. Sleepy is also a fan. Hell, YCM even has a Trollestia. On-Topic: Immunity to effect destruction is nice for Normal monsters and all, but everyone mains cards like Prison and/or Bottomless, which Banish rather then destroy. [/quote] There is also Saikano:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mugendramon Posted August 21, 2011 Report Share Posted August 21, 2011 [quote name='Armadilloz' timestamp='1313953803' post='5459795'] Smeargle and Bullet Monkey from the GFX section aswell. Sleepy is also a fan. Hell, YCM even has a Trollestia. On-Topic: Immunity to effect destruction is nice for Normal monsters and all, but everyone mains cards like Prison and/or[b] Bottomless[/b] [/quote] Does Bottomless still remove if the destruction doesn't happen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted August 23, 2011 Report Share Posted August 23, 2011 [quote name='sleepy' timestamp='1313960497' post='5460150'] There is also Saikano:D [/quote] Wait, what? I main 5 normal monsters normally. I could use this because I lack all those fancy battle phase Fiends, except Gorz and Kuriboh. And now that Fishborg is banned, there are more chances of me having a random Normal in my field. And I play against swarm decks a lot, like Kizan.dek, Superplant.dek or Celfon.dek... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 [quote name='Saikano' timestamp='1314131820' post='5464009'] Wait, what? I main 5 normal monsters normally. I could use this because I lack all those fancy battle phase Fiends, except Gorz and Kuriboh. And now that Fishborg is banned, there are more chances of me having a random Normal in my field. And I play against swarm decks a lot, like Kizan.dek, Superplant.dek or Celfon.dek... [/quote] I mean that you are also a fan of ponies. I saw your Pinkie Pie "FOREVEEEER" sig, then your fancy dressed Twilight Sparkle sig, now your Apple Jack sig. That lead me to such a conclusion ;D More addition to my OT section of the post: Needs battle destruction to Summon, and protects from effect destruction.... it should have "This card is also treated as a Normal Monster" or something along the lines because whoever I look at it, I don't see much useful synergy here. The most I've thought of it is trying to splash it in a casual Deck with Catoblepas and the Witch of Fate. In which case Fortune Ladies, Clear Vice Dragon, Evil Dragon Ananta (or something like that), all outclass this. *sigh* I remember talking to a friend long ago during Gym class, "I want to see if I can finally play with an Orichalcos Deck by 2006 =D !!!" Could have been fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 [quote name='GoldenMagicMonkey' timestamp='1313961011' post='5460177'] Does Bottomless still remove if the destruction doesn't happen? [/quote] No, it does not. Bottomless says "destroy and RFG". In which case, if the first event did not occur, the second does not occur. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NumberCruncher Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 Would it be tasteless if I were to mention Dartz's plan is to fill his deck with 3 of these and 57 Normal monstes so he would have the largest possible deck? Then he would duel Yugi Moto with his huge deck. Then he wil l beat Yugi wtih his deck and rub it in his face Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 [quote name='NumberCruncher' timestamp='1314215271' post='5465968'] Would it be tasteless if I were to mention Dartz's plan is to fill his deck with 3 of these and 57 Normal monstes so he would have the largest possible deck? Then he would duel Yugi Moto with his huge deck. Then he wil l beat Yugi wtih his deck and rub it in his face [/quote] then Dartz remembers that his deck doesn't contain level 4 Normal monsters............. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merci Posted August 25, 2011 Report Share Posted August 25, 2011 [quote]Its ATK is based on your OPPONENT's monsters and while preventing Normal Monsters from dying in battle is cool, it's just pathetic. Your opponent can play anything wiht 1000+ ATK and no other monsters to defeat this easily, or just Synchro/Xyz Summon if they have 2 or more. [/quote] Ojama Trio exists for a reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.