Jump to content

3-0 Banlist Logic


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 137
  • Created
  • Last Reply

[quote name='Ravenous Black' timestamp='1313793145' post='5455897']
Or, you know, you could just play online? ._.

I do't play IRL, though I might buy LC2 to get back into it (200 some cards with quite a few prizes, 30 bucks is the average price, do want)

It's not face-to-face, but it's still fun, and you can still follow the metagame.
[/quote]
I know I tried to once or twice, but I never found a good place to play.

Also, I noticed we've gotten way off topic, so lets get back to talking about ban list positions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='機皇神龍アステリスク' timestamp='1313799421' post='5456091']
[img]http://www.trademarkia.com/logo-images/salvarani/dueling-network-85322818.jpg[/img]

OT: My last post.
[/quote]
I never heard of it while I was playing.


[quote name='arkel' timestamp='1313803010' post='5456174']
Flame Dragon, how's the revised list look?
[/quote]
For the most part it's the one on page 1 minus Heavy. Also, I'd say Gateway of the Six should be banned since it rewards overextending. Also Swords of Revealing Light can probably be limited since unlike the other stall cards has an inherent time limit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Flame Dragon' timestamp='1313803500' post='5456179']
For the most part it's the one on page 1 minus Heavy. Also, I'd say Gateway of the Six should be banned since it rewards overextending. Also Swords of Revealing Light can probably be limited since unlike the other stall cards has an inherent time limit.
[/quote]

I just feel like Heavy is necessary so that people don't overextend their back row. I'll ban Gateway, and I'll unban SoRL, but why Limit it instead of put it to 3?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='arkel' timestamp='1313803852' post='5456184']

I just feel like Heavy is necessary so that people don't overextend their back row. I'll ban Gateway, and I'll unban SoRL, but why Limit it instead of put it to 3?
[/quote]
What would overextending be though? Setting 3 cards wouldn't really be overextending but at that point Heavy just creates a blowout. And their is an inherent difference between overextending creatures (proactive) verse S/T (reactive).

Simple, when you have 3 SoRL you have 9 turns of dead time. Add on ways to reuse it the opponent will spend most of the game watching. At is a bit like Mirror Force, in that 1 helps keeps swarming strategies from being to good but at 3 makes playing to win with creatures more difficult then it should be. And because I'm sure someone will bring it up, the built in time limit it has sets it apart from the other stalling cards like Messenger or Marshmallon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Miror B.' timestamp='1313804101' post='5456189']
I'll actually back this up. It's either a 3-turn window where you don't have to worry about how strong your opponent's monsters are as you set up/burn them to death, or it's very big MST bait.[/quote]
Why don't we just put Swords of Light to 0 then?
....Also, I keep reading all your posts in Twilight's voice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...