Nathanael D. Striker Posted August 10, 2011 Report Share Posted August 10, 2011 Yes, I did take Icy's challenge. Banishing has always been interesting. I chose the concept of banishing since my trademark Deck revolves around banishing. The round-trip part comes from returning cards that were banished to your Deck and vise versa. I have 6 cards so far, but I'm going to feature them 1 at a time. Also, these cards can work with Macro Decks. [img]http://img51.imageshack.us/img51/1470/128884n.jpg[/img] Once per turn: You can banish 1 card from your hand; return 1 card on the field to its owner's Deck. Then shuffle the Deck. When this card is banished: Add 1 banished card to your hand, except this card. [spoiler=BANIS-EN002][img]http://img825.imageshack.us/img825/2043/128884z.jpg[/img] Once per turn: You can banish 1 monster from your Deck; Special Summon 1 banished Level 4 or lower monster, except the banished monster, in Attack Position. During the End Phase: Return the Special Summoned monster to your Deck.[/spoiler] [spoiler=BANIS-EN001][img]http://img820.imageshack.us/img820/7940/128884s.jpg[/img] [i]Cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. Must first be Special Summoned by returning 2 banished cards to your Deck. When this card is destroyed: You can banish this card; banish up to 2 cards on the field.[/i][/spoiler] Image Credit from all the cards shown (or will be shown) go to Daemon, Kuroda Kaito, and HP Doom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crystal Remnants Posted August 10, 2011 Report Share Posted August 10, 2011 Oh wow. I was actually making these cards with that "ascendant" archetype I talked about before. That was the whole point of that crocodile. Of course, I didn't do it as well. I'm just surprised someone else had the idea. I had hoped to keep it mine while I finished some more cards, but oh well. You did a very nice job with this. Though I do think it's a tad bit too much to banish ANY 2 cards on the field when its destroyed. After all, it doesn't take much to special summon in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KurashiDragon Posted August 10, 2011 Report Share Posted August 10, 2011 "This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Special Summoned by returning 2 Banashed cards to your deck. When this monster is destroyed you can Banish this card to Banish 2 cards your opponent controls." This card is overpowered. Make it so that it can only activate it's effect and make it so it's summoning conditions are banishing 2 cards from the top of your deck instead of the other way around. So it should be more like this. "This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Special Summmoned by Banishing the top 2 cards on your deck. When this card is destroyed by battle you can banish this card and 2 cards your opponent controls." Your card is interesting but it makes me think of DD warrior Lady with worse summoning conditions and a slightly better effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted August 10, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 10, 2011 [quote name='KurashiDragon' timestamp='1312992824' post='5430301'] "This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Special Summoned by returning 2 Banashed cards to your deck. When this monster is destroyed you can Banish this card to Banish 2 cards your opponent controls." This card is overpowered. Make it so that it can only activate it's effect and make it so it's summoning conditions are banishing 2 cards from the top of your deck instead of the other way around. So it should be more like this. "This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Special Summmoned by Banishing the top 2 cards on your deck. When this card is destroyed by battle you can banish this card and 2 cards your opponent controls." Your card is interesting but it makes me think of DD warrior Lady with worse summoning conditions and a slightly better effect. [/quote] There are cards that use banished monsters for their attack. Your change defeats the purpose of the round-trip. Plus, it allows you to reuse cards. Also, stop using the Old OCG to fix New OCG. I hate it when people do that. @Rem: Yea, but if you play Macro Decks right, it'll help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted August 10, 2011 Report Share Posted August 10, 2011 change 1 thing, Striker: "[i]You can banish this card; banish 2 cards on the field.[/i] " Say banish UP TO 2 cards on the field (in case there aren't that many to banish) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted August 10, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 10, 2011 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1313007161' post='5430956'] change 1 thing, Striker: "[i]You can banish this card; banish 2 cards on the field.[/i] " Say banish UP TO 2 cards on the field (in case there aren't that many to banish) [/quote] Thanks for that rag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted August 10, 2011 Report Share Posted August 10, 2011 not a problem I'll give you the 9.4/10 for it, but you tell me where you got that picture from Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted August 10, 2011 Report Share Posted August 10, 2011 lol fattening your deck is OP'd huh XD Card seems fine, and I agree with Rag on the banishing up to 2 cards, it really doesn't constitute the drawback of banishing one of your cards just because your opponent only has 1 card on the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted August 10, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 10, 2011 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1313007442' post='5430981'] not a problem I'll give you the 9.4/10 for it, but you tell me where you got that picture from [/quote] I put the three people I used images from for my 6 cards. Thanks for reminding me. @Miror: Odds are, this card will enjoy a round-trip back to the Deck with the other cards I have.Second card up. I hope the last minute changes I did to it were for the better. Also, wording may be a bit off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted August 11, 2011 Report Share Posted August 11, 2011 my gut feeling is it's not going to be going to your deck anyway because you'll have used the summon monster for synchro or XYZ food to that end it should be fine, a little plain, but I'll give you 9.2/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted August 11, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 11, 2011 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1313023023' post='5431843'] my gut feeling is it's not going to be going to your deck anyway because you'll have used the summon monster for synchro or XYZ food to that end it should be fine, a little plain, but I'll give you 9.2/10 [/quote] Yea, but if your opponent prevents you from doing that, it'll enjoy its round-trip. Also, the majority of people in the challenge are going for playability and usefulness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted August 11, 2011 Report Share Posted August 11, 2011 all right, what to you think the odds are it'll get the roundtrip? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted August 11, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 11, 2011 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1313023191' post='5431854'] all right, what to you think the odds are it'll get the roundtrip? [/quote] Not high. It'll most likely be used for a Synchro or a Rank 4 Xyz. Out of those options, the latter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted August 12, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 12, 2011 Le 3rd is up. Also, le BUMP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simping For Hina Posted August 12, 2011 Report Share Posted August 12, 2011 My images o.O I do not see number 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted August 12, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 12, 2011 [quote name='Daemon' timestamp='1313108973' post='5434446'] My images o.O I do not see number 3. [/quote] Some of them are. Also, had image troubles with 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted August 12, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 12, 2011 Le BUMP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.