Jump to content

DestructoDragon Vs. Greenfrog100


DestructoDragon

Recommended Posts

[quote name='DestructoDragon' timestamp='1313428872' post='5445021']
Constructive critisism would be useful
[/quote]
Fine.

DestructoDragon: Duo Dragon is more original as far the the effect, but if you put it in terms of statistics, you have a six-star monster with 2200 ATK that can, in generic terms, attack twice in one turn, because there is almost always a possibility that your opponent will have a creature out to block that thing. Even with only 2200 ATK it is still a big hit. If this were a Normal Monster, the statistics would be correct, but adding the additional attack on the same turn tips the scale a bit. Just saying, if my opponent sacrificed one crunchy to put out a killer dragon that attacks twice, that wouldn't seem fair, especially if it's only the first 5 turns. Plus I don't like the lack of background in the card image, but I guess that's a little pious.

Greenfrog100: A level 10 omega dragon with 4000 ATK that increases for every dragon slain before it came out. I'm sensing a final battle concept here. But the thing is... level 8 or higher monsters require 2 tributes, which means if you tribute 2 crunchies to put out a level 10 dragon with 4000 ATK, your opponent is going to throw his/her cards down and surrender, and when I say that, that's not a good thing. You can't make it too easy for you to win. Example: it is turn 3 and your opponent has some creatures out. He plans to attack your crunchies and take out a good chunk of your LP, then all of a sudden BAM! a giant 4000 ATK dragon blows away the duel in 2 turns. Only advice I have is... lower the stats a bit, maybe to 3500 or something, maybe lower, because if you think about it, if you time it right, you can still have a hell of a beat down on your opponent if you played plenty of weaker dragons prior to the final showdown.

So basically, without being pious, Dragon King has a better concept behind it. Duo Dragon is good, but it lacks the background and purpose. When I judge cards, I start with statistics, but as I progress, I start to aim towards the story behind it. So based on what I feel makes more sense, I vote for Greenfrog100's card. Blud is out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blud is right, both cards are OP'd. Tough i think "Duo dragon" is better.
Why? It's simple, both cards can cause a lot of damage but "Dragon King", when tribute summoned (if used in a dragon deck) has at least 5000 ATK points having the posibility of making much more damage than "Duo Dragon". That is why i also think that "Dragon King" is a bit more OP'd than the other card.

Also both cards are uncreative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='DestructoDragon' timestamp='1313482143' post='5446675']
So does this men its 1-1 to green or 1-0
[/quote]

It's 1-1

And I vote for Duodragon. Both cards are uncreative, have bad pics, are RIDICULOUSLY OPed, and are just overall bad. But Dragon King is even more generic of a name, and is one of the worst cards I've seen. Duodragon gets my vote, not because it is in any way good, but because it is the lesser of two evils.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

[quote name='DestructoDragon' timestamp='1313428872' post='5445021']
Constructive critisism would be useful
[/quote]
He voted, it has nothing to do with giving feedback.

Even though it doesn't feel so right, I'll vote duo dragon.
I'll agree with mirror, it's the least worse of the two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...