toonbob20 Posted August 22, 2011 Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 How do I know what my score is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GhostNinja Posted August 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 as the judges make their notes and scores they will be posted on here and then the event winners will be both posted on here and notified via pm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KittyGirl86 Posted August 23, 2011 Report Share Posted August 23, 2011 alright everyone. here are my scores for the new cards. remember reaming is not appreciated: [b]Myren[/b]: Over all score: 7.5: over all not bad cards. a little work here and there and you're good to go. Ritual shield: over all score:7.5/10: you need to watch your grammar and how you work your cards but over all not too bad. Card art: 9/10: I love this pic. It really works for this card and is beautiful besides. Functionality: 7/10:At it's base it's not a bad function, however I think it would be better used on a ritual spell card. However not bad. Grammar: 6/10:Okay. I consulted with my fellow judges and we are in agreement. As of our latest knowledge, which admittedly is not THE latest, the correct grammar for this card should be as follows: You can only activate this card when you Ritual Summon a Ritual Monster. Any Ritual Monster summoned this turn gains 200 ATK and its Ritual Summon cannot be negated. Dragon Call: Over all score: 6.5/10: I scored a bit harshly on this cards grammar because it was the second card I had tell you to watch your grammar on. Please be aware of it. These cards are supposed to be realistic so just watch your grammar a bit. In real life outside of cards it's not that big of a deal. however we are dealing with cards that are supposed to be realistic so I had to judge you harshly for it. I'm sorry. but other that that your cards are very well done. Again a little tweaking to fix them up and we're good. Card art: 8/10: Not bad. Again it really fits the card. Functionality: 7/10: Sounds fine to me. Very feasible and do able. The score comes more from difficulty of monster trying to summon. Grammar: 5/10: Again grammar is a bit of an issue. It should be as follows: This card is used to ritual summon "bahmut the dragon lord". You must also offer monsters whose total level stars equal 9 or more as a tribute from your field or your hand. Bahmut the dragon lord: overall score: 8.5/10: Just watch how your cards are supposed to work. Card Art: 7/10: I like the pic but I'm wondering if maybe something would work better. It looks a little too battle defined. But over all good art. Functionality: 7/10: A little over-powered. Typically cards with this kind of effect, that can either deal damage or destroy monsters, usually don't have that high of a base stat. Also, that being said, it is a good effect however level 9 is a little high. I recommend dropping it down to a level 8 or 7 with base stats to match.over all good though. *I ask that next time you have a card like this that you type out the info. It was a bit difficult to read. So please, for my eyes, add a foot note with the description that is on the card.* Grammar: 9/10: Way to go. I only noticed two problems with this card. you missed a punctuation and that does not have an a at the end. That is all though. ____________________________________________________________________________ [b]Rowling[/b]: overall score: Call of the decayed: Over all score: 0/10: I'm very sorry but due to violation of the rules your cards are ineligible to be judged. the rules clearly state that all cards must be realistic and have the correct copyright of 1996 kazuki takahashi. J.k. rowling is not the correct copyright: "RULES: being a realistic cards challenge, all submitted cards must have the correct copyright marks (1996 KAZUKI TAKAHASHI)" we are very sorry. Also the creator, and head judge of this contest, ghostninja, wishes to know where you got the card art for for kriva the deathless. please send a message to either myself or ghostninja with the link enclosed. You are welcome and encouraged to submit your cards in the next round. We look forward to seeing your cards there. However next time please be aware of the rules so that you are not disqualified. ____________________________________________________________________________ [b]Toonbob[/b]: over all score: 7.5/10: Dual effect cards a great. they can be very handy and great strategically. However your dual effects are counter-effective to each other. please watch out for that. And please watch the dates on your cards. Your over all score is getting lowered because of this. The card mark copyright is 1996 Kazuki Takahashi. You have this but you also have copyright 2011. please be aware of this in the future. The actual date goes somewhere else. Your original score was an 8/10 but you had a half point deduction due to the date being in the wrong place next to the copyright. You have a good base to start from. Just try to watch your multiple effects. Lions comfort: over all score: 9/10: Over all very well done. A few tweaks her and there and it could get better. Not a bad start. Card art: 10/10: Congratulations. I don't really believe in giving out this score because nothing is ever perfect. However your picture for this card has done what I thought impossible. It is perfect. I cannot imagine a better picture for this card. Functionality: 7/10: This card is trying to do two things at once and that doesn't work. A way to fix this problem is to make the first effect the main effect, and make the second a turn-based effect. Once per turn this happens after the first turn. Grammar: 9/10: almost perfect. Only one problem. deck is not decl. that's it. Pounce of the lion: Over all score: 7/10: This card needs a lot of work. You wanted to double the effect and the multiple effects just don't work. You are very earnest and trying very hard but you need to work a bit more on your card effects and functions. Card art: 4/10: I was disappointed in this picture. 1. it looks more like a tiger, although slightly abstract, than a lion and 2. It has no correlation to pouncing. if anything it looks like the creature is hitting itself. Functionality: 2/10: This card pretty much negates itself. It hurts you in the long run. It might seem like it helps but what if you deal more than 1,000 damage then what? It is negated for the 1,000. I think this card could be good if you just used it to lower your opponents ATK and DEF. If you want dual effect cards then this one would be good if the ATK and DEF that your opponent looses your monster gains. Grammar:10/10: No obvious grammatical errors. The king of lions: Over all score: 6.5/10: Again not a bad card but it needs work. Your multiple effects just aren't working well together. Please take these criticisms as the constructive criticisms they are meant to be. We want you to learn and make more and better cards. you have the desire and ideas. you just need a little direction and discretion. Card art: 7/10: It's a good picture but for this card I was hoping for something other than the ghostly apparition of a lion king. It just seems like a little too much of a play on the movie and a little too stereotypical. But it is a very lovely and striking picture. Functionality: 5/10: OK so I'm afraid that there a few things wrong with this cards functionality. For one you need to drop the level to a 7 or 8. Secondly, rephrasing is needed a possible suggestion is: When this card is summoned successfully, special summon one level 6 or lower monster. Increase the ATk of this card by the original ATk of the special summoned monster. If this card attacked during this turn, switch it to defense position during your end phase. Thirdly, and this is just a suggestion, you may have a very good reason for leaving the ATk 0 I don't know, but I would suggest giving it a small base ATk. Grammar: 7/10: you missed a word. "whenever THIS card attacks". ___________________________________________________________ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GhostNinja Posted August 23, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 23, 2011 assassin29, daredevil7774, Varion,Yu-gi-oh PWNED… Josh, jkheoift, LiquidDJ11 - still need submissions, or im going to have to drop you guys. please post soon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KittyGirl86 Posted August 23, 2011 Report Share Posted August 23, 2011 jkkohles, I'm afraid I have bad news for you. According to the rules set down for this competition you are disqualified. RULES: being a realistic cards challenge, all submitted cards must have the correct copyright marks (1996 KAZUKI TAKAHASHI) Your copyright is incorrect. We are sorry about this but rules are rues. WE really liked your cards but due to the rules you are disqualified and can no longer be considered for judgment in this round. All scores are null and void. However feel free to enter the next competition. You show a remarkable talent for card making and we would love to what you might come up with. Again we are sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Varionius Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 [quote name='GhostNinja' timestamp='1314133306' post='5464063'] assassin29, daredevil7774, Varion,Yu-gi-oh PWNED… Josh, jkheoift, LiquidDJ11 - still need submissions, or im going to have to drop you guys. please post soon [/quote] MMM, I changed my name from Varion to Wyren. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiquidDJ11 Posted August 25, 2011 Report Share Posted August 25, 2011 mnes liquidDJ now (josh was old) i never entered this but... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GhostNinja Posted August 25, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 25, 2011 oh ok lol ok, for future references, send me a pm or someting so we dont think that you are two peoples ok? thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiquidDJ11 Posted August 25, 2011 Report Share Posted August 25, 2011 k sorry image kredit jazinkay [img]http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/2872/299261k.jpg[/img] Lore:If your opponent controls a Psychic monster; no spell or trap cards can be negated, until that card(s) is removed from the field. you can only activate this effect if you activate a spell or trap card. Once per turn; non Psychic monsters are treated as Psychic monsters; until the End Phase. [img]http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/6387/299261.jpg[/img] Lore:Discard 1 Psychic monster from your hand to activate this card: Destroy 1 card your opponent controls; if you destroy a monster; inflict damage to your own life points equal to the cards ATK [img]http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/9052/299261b.jpg[/img] Lore:You can only activate this card if you control no Psychic monsters. by discarding 1 card from your hand; your opponent must reveal his hand. select 1 monster in his hand and send it to the Graveyard.Then you may search your Deck for a Psychic monster of the same level as the destroyed monster and add it to your hand. If he has no monsters; destroy 1 spell or trap card on the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiquidDJ11 Posted August 26, 2011 Report Share Posted August 26, 2011 i fixed it are we ready to judge? hello? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indraasrei0602 Posted August 27, 2011 Report Share Posted August 27, 2011 this former judge congratulates all who entered, and apologizes for such a delay that caused me to be taken from the roster of judges, as i am working on getting a job, among not having steady internet, and running all sorts of errands. again, i apologize for not judging all cards, but those that i did, i hope you see my judgement as fair, and hopefully all who strive to create can take notes, and better their own work from them. good luck to all and peace out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GhostNinja Posted August 28, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 28, 2011 the judgin has already begun and we go through the cards as they come. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nu-Mou Knight Posted August 28, 2011 Report Share Posted August 28, 2011 Can you give those of us involved in Snake a rough estimate of the time it'll take for this to be finished up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KittyGirl86 Posted August 28, 2011 Report Share Posted August 28, 2011 Alright liquiddj. if you give me a few I'll judge your cards. We thank you for fixing. small note. the 201 should not go by the copyright but that's OK. common enough mistake. no damage done to points. just a little note.LiquidDj11: Overall score: 7/10: On the whole, I like your cards. But your grammar really throws me for a loop. You have a fairly strong grasp on what you want your cards to do. You've picked out very nice card art that really fits your titles, but you seem to have a terrible problem with punctuation. Please be aware of this and fix it on future cards. But other than that I love your cards. You have a very good idea of how to create a winning trio. Nicely done. ___________________________________________________ Psi Blader: overall score: 7.5/10: Very nice card. A little mixed up on the functionality but not all that much. The grammar was a real problem here. Please be on the look out for that. Card Art: 7/10: It's a very nice picture for this card. it fits rather well. I just could have wished for it to be a bit of a lighter picture. I know plenty of people who like the card art dark like this. It's not really my thing but I do like this picture overall. It really fits the cards title well. Functionality: 8/10: The level and stats don't match. It either needs to go up a level or lower the stats a bit. Grammar: 6/10: First off. you used the semi colon too much. it does not need to be used where you used it. the semi colon is supposed to be used in sorta like and and or a but. they were not necessary where used. you also used a comma in the wrong place. You need to capitalize the 'y' in you, beginning of second sentence. ___________________________________________________ Psi blaster: 6.5/10: Not too bad. The effect could use a little tweaking but it was the grammar that really got me. Please work on that in the future. Card art: 8/10: I'll admit to finding this a bit odd. At first I wasn't sure how to take it. I thought that it was very wrong because it was supposed to be a blast of psi energy. But then I researched and found that psi energy frequently takes on shapes when used in a direct form. So it wasn't so odd and out of place anymore. Once I got that out of the way I was able to really look at the card and pay attention to the card art and I found it very acceptable. Very well done DJ. Functionality: 6/10: The first part of this card is very well done. I like what it does. but then we get to the second part. You are getting hurt from a successful hit on your opponent. It would be better if you had it to where YOUR OPPONENT takes damage equal to the destroyed monsters ATK. Grammar: 5.5/10: You need a period in place of your colon. you need a period in place of your first semi-colon. you need a comma in place of your second semi-colon. and you need a period at the end. I deducted a point for each missed punctuation because you have so many and thy are so blatantly obvious. I took off an extra half point for the second card having the same type of mistakes as the first. ___________________________________________________ Psi Charge: 7.5/10: As a whole this card works very well. Please be more aware of correct punctuation and capitalization. That is really the only problem I had with this card. Card art: 8/10: Okay. This is a seriously weird picture for this card and yet it works. I'm not entirely sure how. And this is a oddity in and of itself. I'm normally very sure on card art. In any case well done again. Functionality: 8/10: Not bad. Very helpful. Well done DJ. Grammar: 5/10: Your grammar is an issue again. Misuse of semicolons and wrong punctuation to go hand in hand with that.Also as a side note you should use his/her hand. Also please be aware of correct capitalization. There were four mistakes but I took an extra point of for this being the third card with grammatical issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiquidDJ11 Posted August 28, 2011 Report Share Posted August 28, 2011 garrrrrrrrr grammar shammar why is it sucha big deal lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAINTAIN GOD OF DUNDA MT. Posted August 28, 2011 Report Share Posted August 28, 2011 [quote name='LiquidDJ11' timestamp='1314560964' post='5475383'] garrrrrrrrr grammar shammar why is it sucha big deal lol [/quote] Because it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GhostNinja Posted August 28, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 28, 2011 [quote name='Nu-Mou Knight' timestamp='1314505582' post='5474060'] Can you give those of us involved in Snake a rough estimate of the time it'll take for this to be finished up? [/quote] we are only waiting on the last two players to submit and once they have, grade them and then tally the scores so hopefully fairly soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiquidDJ11 Posted August 28, 2011 Report Share Posted August 28, 2011 lol star.. but if grammar was right it would be gold lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAINTAIN GOD OF DUNDA MT. Posted August 28, 2011 Report Share Posted August 28, 2011 [quote name='GhostNinja' timestamp='1314569815' post='5475787'] we are only waiting on the last two players to submit and once they have, grade them and then tally the scores so hopefully fairly soon. [/quote] If they are taking so long. Disqualify them. Cause people don't want to wait bro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiquidDJ11 Posted August 28, 2011 Report Share Posted August 28, 2011 ya pm them and wait 1 more day then if nothing happens, boot them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KittyGirl86 Posted August 29, 2011 Report Share Posted August 29, 2011 [quote name='LiquidDJ11' timestamp='1314560964' post='5475383'] garrrrrrrrr grammar shammar why is it sucha big deal lol [/quote] Grammar is a big deal because these cards are supposed to be realistic and bad punctuation makes i hard to read the cards. That is hwy it's such a big deal.Don't worry. your cards are still great[quote name='LiquidDJ11' timestamp='1314570819' post='5475828'] ya pm them and wait 1 more day then if nothing happens, boot them [/quote] We have given them till the end of the week. If they have not posted by then we will disqualify them ad move on with the competition. we wanted to give others a chance to increase the competition value. we are sorry for the wait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiquidDJ11 Posted August 29, 2011 Report Share Posted August 29, 2011 yay even better, and ya i suppose ur right kitty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GhostNinja Posted September 12, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 12, 2011 sorry guys, my comp suffered a massive viral attack and has finally recovered. ok so since the last two have not posted, they have been disqualified. so now we will tally the scores, and announce the winners tomorrow. i hope to see you guys in the next round! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiquidDJ11 Posted September 19, 2011 Report Share Posted September 19, 2011 Results anytime soon? please post so Snake can start Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GhostNinja Posted December 12, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 12, 2011 I must apoligize, our unit was deployed with no advance notice, but now we are back and rushing to get back on to the contests. i just need to go over everything in my notes, and reread over the cards again and then probably crash... im still at the airport coming home. so the winner will be announced by at the very latest friday. again we are very sorry, but army takes precedence over YCM. i hope you all understand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.