Baragan Posted July 18, 2011 Report Share Posted July 18, 2011 LV. 9 Typ: Thunder Fusion/Effect ATK:2000/ DEF:2000 This card can only be Special Summoned from your Graveyard by banishing from play 3 Fiend Type Monster from your hand (This Summon is treated as a Fusion Summon). While this card is face up on the field, your oponent can only play cards in face down Attack position. If this card would be destroyed by a Spell- or Trapcard, inflict damage to your oponent equal the ATK of this card. Link to comment
MibeR Posted July 18, 2011 Report Share Posted July 18, 2011 [spoiler='Old OCG']This card can only be Special Summoned from your Graveyard by removing from play 3 Fiend-Type monster from your hand (This Summon is treated as a Fusion Summon). While this card is face up on the field, your opponent can only Set monster in face-down Attack position. If this card would be destroyed by Spell or Trap Card, inflict damage to your oponent equal the ATK of this card. [/spoiler] [spoiler='New']Must be Special Summoned from your Graveyard. Banish 3 Fiend-Type monster from your hand: Special Summon this card (from your Graveyard) (This Summon is treated as a Fusion Summon). While this card is face up on the field: Your opponent can only Set monster in face-down Attack position. If this card would be destroyed by Spell or Trap Card: inflict damage to your oponent equal the ATK of this card before the effect is resolves.[/spoiler] Need 3 Fiend in hand seems hard. I thought it can be compatible with Infernities, Yes discard is better. Link to comment
Umbra Posted July 18, 2011 Report Share Posted July 18, 2011 I'd personally make it an Effect monster, seeing as you don't have any Fusion Material, and the only summoning condition you've specified is from the Graveyard. Link to comment
Baragan Posted July 19, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 Ah ok, and the OCG is ok? Link to comment
MibeR Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 My recommended OCG is okay. And add some ATK, banish 3 Fiend is not easy. 2800+ its still fine Link to comment
Umbra Posted July 19, 2011 Report Share Posted July 19, 2011 "would be" is incorrect; it implies an "instead" later on in the effect, which seems a bit OP to be honest. "is" would be the word you're looking for. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.