Jump to content

Halo: Reach Campaign


Recommended Posts

[quote name='SSxMINI LUCAS' timestamp='1309304767' post='5318197']
It was probably the best campaign ever, I mean out of all the Halos.
[/quote]
[img]http://www.halolz.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/halolz-dot-com-teamfortress2-nope.avi-obama-poster.jpg[/img]



IMO, Halo: Combat Evolved or 3.



And on Legendary, it was stupidly easy compared to Halo 3. And I've heard that the previous ones were even harder.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reach's story was brilliant, but it could've been presented better. As it stands, it's still pretty awesome.

Legendary was alright, not too hard, not too easy. Exodus however was a spawn of satan and took me 6 hours to beat. It was worth it though, to see that Monument to All your sins Achievement Pop up in front of 2 witnesses, made me feel on top of the world. I now stand at 1075 G, but I can't play since my disk cracked.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='OnSlaUghT' timestamp='1309321044' post='5318830']
Reach's story was brilliant, but it could've been presented better. As it stands, it's still pretty awesome.

[/quote]

The story, actually, is the worst part of the campaign. I mean, sure, it's ok, but it breaks so many things that has been said by the Halo canon.


Like how Reach fell in one day.

Not in the game, apparently.


Also, I felt that the ways that the Noble team died off was just lazy. The only one that really seemed ok was Jorge's. And MAYBE Emile's.


Random headshot from the sky? lolnope.

Fate never determined? Better then ^ that one.

Crashing into a Scarab, stealing from me an epic Scarab fight? YOU SHALL NEVER BE FORGIVEN, CARTER.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Mako109' timestamp='1309322398' post='5318871']
The story, actually, is the worst part of the campaign. I mean, sure, it's ok, but it breaks so many things that has been said by the Halo canon.


Like how Reach fell in one day.

Not in the game, apparently.


Also, I felt that the ways that the Noble team died off was just lazy. The only one that really seemed ok was Jorge's. And MAYBE Emile's.


Random headshot from the sky? lolnope.

Fate never determined? Better then ^ that one.

Crashing into a Scarab, stealing from me an epic Scarab fight? YOU SHALL NEVER BE FORGIVEN, CARTER.
[/quote]

A Scarab fight would've been awesome, but it takes away from the urgency. Also Why didn't Carter eject.
Also , shouldn't Kat's shield be up?
Jun lives and they plan to use him later (hopes for Halo 4)

They had excellent material, but it feels rushed. I liked Jorge, Emile and Carter, but felt Nothing for Kat and Jun, maybe because they were so useless to the gameplay. Maybe, we'll have a movie about it that actually presents the story better. It still was a good story if you sit down and think about it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
[quote name='OnSlaUghT' timestamp='1309323214' post='5318890']
A Scarab fight would've been awesome, but it takes away from the urgency. Also Why didn't Carter eject.
Also , shouldn't Kat's shield be up?
Jun lives and they plan to use him later (hopes for Halo 4)

They had excellent material, but it feels rushed. I liked Jorge, Emile and Carter, but felt Nothing for Kat and Jun, maybe because they were so useless to the gameplay. Maybe, we'll have a movie about it that actually presents the story better. It still was a good story if you sit down and think about it.
[/quote]

Uh no he dies somewhere, just not in a game. Halo: Reach does not come after Halo 3 here:
Halo Wars>>Halo: Reach>>Halo: CE>>Halo 2>>Halo 3 ODST>>Halo 3>>Halo 4

I know he dies because we all know that Master Chief ended up being the last of his kind. And Halo 3's campaign for Legendary was easy compared to Reach's. I played Reach for a year, played H3 and beat it on Legendary within 2 days. I even have the vidmaster for the last mission. Reach's Legendary is the worst 'cause it takes not one but [b]TWO .50cal Anti-Materiel[/b] sniper rifle rounds [b]IN THE HEAD[/b] to kill an elite. Do you wanna know what we call that? BULLSHIT. In case you don't know what Anti-Materiel means, it can also be known as Anti-Armor, Light Anti-Air, Anti-Tank. 2 shots to the head that can immobilize a tank in one. I think Bungie doesn't know much about real firearms...

Alien tech or not how come their shields are more powerful then our Spartan's? Total BS. On Halo 3 it was NOT like that. So I don't know how you can think Reach was easy. Especially since the weapon's in the game actually do LESS damage on that game compared to if you put them in Halo 3.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='SSxMINI LUCAS' timestamp='1310544042' post='5350776']
NO WAI!!! Halo 3's MP gave the player a much better experience compared to Reach.
[/quote]

I loved Reach, for both Singleplayer AND Multiplayer. The multiplayer was the first multiplayer ever to have me online for 24 hours straight. It's a shame my disk cracked, I can only play DLC maps now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Halo 3 was obviously the worst out of the four main games. Seriously, it's campaign wasn't that good, and the multiplayer was only so-so. Like, it's not a bad game at all, but Reach was SO much better. Reach's campaign was so much more personal and good, the story was presented well, and the multiplayer was much better.

Quite honestly, I really can't see how anyone thinks Halo 3 was better in terms of those aspects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name=''raiN' timestamp='1310876944' post='5362019']
Halo 3 was obviously the worst out of the four main games. Seriously, it's campaign wasn't that good, and the multiplayer was only so-so. Like, it's not a bad game at all, but Reach was SO much better. Reach's campaign was so much more personal and good, the story was presented well, and the multiplayer was much better.

Quite honestly, I really can't see how anyone thinks Halo 3 was better in terms of those aspects.
[/quote]

I had more fun in Halo 3 Matchmaking. It was more friendly. There was alot more maps with better lighting and contrast etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='SSxMINI LUCAS' timestamp='1310877476' post='5362052']
I had more fun in Halo 3 Matchmaking. It was more friendly. There was alot more maps with better lighting and contrast etc.
[/quote]

Not at all. Halo 3's lighting and contrast were unrealistic. That super shine that attacked most of the maps was total over kill. Haha. Plus, Halo Reach hasn't come out with the same amount of maps yet. The maps I think are much more varied. There's a better variety. As far as actual mood while playing, Halo for me has always been filled with dicks. Just switch the settings around to get a better experience for you. I like chatty, competitive, egotistical underground play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name=''raiN' timestamp='1310878327' post='5362110']
Not at all. Halo 3's lighting and contrast were unrealistic. That super shine that attacked most of the maps was total over kill. Haha. [b]Plus, Halo Reach hasn't come out with the same amount of maps yet.[/b] The maps I think are much more varied. There's a better variety. As far as actual mood while playing, Halo for me has always been filled with dicks. Just switch the settings around to get a better experience for you. I like chatty, competitive, egotistical underground play.
[/quote]

Haha. Dude there's no more maps. No more anything. Bungie's gone dark genius. 7/7 was their last day. WAo haha nice one. And I liked the lighting effect 'cause they made the game look MUCH better than Reach

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree. That may just be your style I guess. As far as realism, Reach had a much better look, which I like. Halo 3 was devoid of the life that Reach had. It was more glossed over. I mean, this is just my opinion, I just like the real look. Glossy, plastic look is better for platformers. If you like Halo 3's look better, that's chill. :PP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name=''raiN' timestamp='1310879006' post='5362150']
I disagree. That may just be your style I guess. As far as realism, Reach had a much better look, which I like. Halo 3 was devoid of the life that Reach had. It was more glossed over. I mean, this is just my opinion, I just like the real look. Glossy, plastic look is better for platformers. If you like Halo 3's look better, that's chill. :PP
[/quote]
U heard me about bungie right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name=''raiN' timestamp='1310879006' post='5362150']
I disagree. That may just be your style I guess. As far as realism, Reach had a much better look, which I like. Halo 3 was devoid of the life that Reach had. It was more glossed over. I mean, this is just my opinion, I just like the real look. Glossy, plastic look is better for platformers. If you like Halo 3's look better, that's chill. :PP
[/quote]

Only because it was older, Halo 3 was made in 07. It just makes it a classical game.. Just like COD4, WaW, Gears, all of those platinum hits games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...