This Account is Unplayable Posted July 27, 2011 Report Share Posted July 27, 2011 @Unown, it's seriously hard to even rate without its summoning conditions. Please add them in, as a Synchro is does need them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simping For Hina Posted July 27, 2011 Report Share Posted July 27, 2011 Unless it is an Effect Monster hidden as a Synchro Monster. o.O Creative idea, very creative, but not acceptable. (Talking about the above statement I said) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Two-Hundred And One Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 ...I left out the summoning conditions? Oh my. [spoiler=Take 4.][img]http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/9735/214780.jpg[/img][/spoiler] And the pic wasn't squished, per say, just shrunk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted July 28, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 @ Unownguy: Can you send me a link to that pic, since I want to see what it looked like originally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
вєgσттєη ιηѕαηιту Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 [spoiler=some cards]|Dark Gravity Magician|0|XXXX|Spellcaster/Effect|Dark|2||500|700|Each time your opponent activates one spell card, place one spell counter on this card. When this card is removed from the field disperse all spell counters on this card to enemy monsters.| |Spell Expulsion|0|XXXX|Trap Card|Trap||Quick-Play|||Destroy all monsters with spell counters on them.| |Transfer of Energy|0|XXXX|Spell Card|Spell||None|||Remove all spell counters off the field and place them on one spellcaster type monster.| |Mythical Beast Unicron|0|XXXX|Spellcaster/Effect|Dark|4||1400|1400|When a spell counter is removed off a card, while this card is face up on the field, place the spell counters on this monster. Increase the ATK of thie card by 100 for each spell counter on this card.| |Power Save|0|XXXX|Spell Card|Spell||Continuous|||When a monster with a spell counter on it is destroyed place all of the spell counters on that card onto this card. When this card is destroyed deal 50 damage to your opponent for every spell counter on this card.| [/spoiler] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 @Unown, I gave you the correct OCG, I suggest you add that too. Either way, the card's still too slow to warrant any use. I'd run Brionac and Orient over it, any day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LC Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 Can you guys rate this card? I made it for a set another club is doing based on YCM's Members. [center][img]http://img685.imageshack.us/img685/2843/345295.jpg[/img] Lore: Once per turn, while this card is in face-up Attack Postition, you can pay 1000 Life Points to Special Summon 1 "YCMember" monster from your Graveyard in face-up Defense Position. The summoned monster's ATK is halved for the rest of the duel. This card cannot be targeted for an attack while there is another face-up "YCMember" monster on the field. This card gains 100 ATK for each "YCMember" monster in your Graveyard. Destroy this card if there are no other cards on your side of the field. [size="1"][color="#C0C0C0"]IMG Credit to JazinKay[/color][/size][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 [quote name='Inferno Knight LC' timestamp='1311862399' post='5395045'] Lore: Once per turn, while this card is in face-up Attack Postition: You can pay 1000 Life Points; Special Summon 1 "YCMember" monster from your Graveyard in face-up Defense Position. The Summoned monster's ATK is halved (permanently). This card cannot be targeted for an attack while there is another face-up "YCMember" monster on the field. This card gains 100 ATK for each "YCMember" monster in your Graveyard. Destroy this card if there are no other cards on your side of the field. [/quote] Should be it for OCG fixes. Might be off on a few bits though. I'd suggest not allowing it to bring back another one of itself, or else it gets to be easy to spam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simping For Hina Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 The image is very well chosen, but very over used in the process as well. The name is completely understandable. A little overpowered with being able to Special Summon, so you can easily abuse that power, even if once per turn, and allow you to keep this on the field for some time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LC Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 K, I might add an effect that you can only control 1 of it at a time. How would I word that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simping For Hina Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 That would balance it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 [quote name='Inferno Knight LC' timestamp='1311863394' post='5395094'] K, I might add an effect that you can only control 1 of it at a time. How would I word that? [/quote] You can only control 1 face-up "YCMember - Inferno Knight LC". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter. Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 i'd like to join. Entry Card: [IMG]http://i52.tinypic.com/1gkpok.jpg[/IMG] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 remove from play is banish. Other than that, Obelisk? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter. Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 ah, forgot about that part. still haven't got used to the new OCG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simping For Hina Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 I'd say Ra, it is not that creative. The whole opposite attribute attacks or is attacked thing has been done. Name could use more work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 OCG definitely needs an update, but is accurate to the old OCG. Card itself is UP'd, but overall it's decently done. Ra. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted July 28, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 Hunter of the Damned placed in Ra then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 could you guys just go along with my Obelisk ruling? Tristan, I took care of the OCG part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simping For Hina Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 Striker, no. OCG is just how the grammar of the text goes. You need the text to have OCG and the text needs to flow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted July 28, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 [quote name='Mr. Striker' timestamp='1311865502' post='5395178'] could you guys just go along with my Obelisk ruling? Tristan, I took care of the OCG part. [/quote] I simply averaged the ratings. Obelisk = 3; Ra = 2. Therefore total rates = 7. Average: 7/3 = 2.3 (Rounded to 2, ie Ra) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 [quote name='Mr. Striker' timestamp='1311865502' post='5395178'] could you guys just go along with my Obelisk ruling? Tristan, I took care of the OCG part. [/quote] Why make him Obelisk when we think he clearly belongs in Ra? Also, you didn't really take care of the OCG, you made 1 fix when there were numerous. If you're going to make it banish, it may as well all be the new OCG, colons and all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 [quote name='Tristan T. Taylor' timestamp='1311865851' post='5395201'] Why make him Obelisk when we think he clearly belongs in Ra? Also, you didn't really take care of the OCG, you made 1 fix when there were numerous. If you're going to make it banish, it may as well all be the new OCG, colons and all. [/quote] Yea. I did what I could easily fix with no lore posted. Also, I said "Obelisk?". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter. Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 they've agreed now. i can improve and aim for Obelisk now anyway. besides, couldn't you see the lore on the card? it wasn't that small. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 [quote name='Hџŋter of the Đamήeđ' timestamp='1311866014' post='5395210'] they've agreed now. i can improve and aim for Obelisk now anyway. besides, couldn't you see the lore on the card? it wasn't that small. [/quote] I don't like retyping the lore. I prefer the "copy, paste, fix" method. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.