Under_Age_User Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 Chaos Pudding' date=' why do you say that every good card in this game have to be banned? It's like you just can't stand then/don't have it and has been used on you. It's like ''If you can't have it, nobody will''[/quote'] What poorly constructed argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 As I have said in another Chaos Puddings thread, ''Why not just ban every card in the game?'' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 As I have said in another Chaos Puddings thread' date=' ''Why not just ban every card in the game?''[/quote'] Because most cards are not hurtful to the meta. DMoC and Prem are, therefor they should be banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Under_Age_User Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 As I have said in another Chaos Puddings thread' date=' ''Why not just ban every card in the game?''[/quote'] Then why not just allow cards in 3s? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 Chaos Pudding' date=' why do you say that every good card in this game have to be banned? It's like you just can't stand then/don't have it and has been used on you. It's like ''If you can't have it, nobody will''[/quote'] Maybe I should add the following comment to my sig. JUST BECAUSE A CARD IS GOOD DOES NOT MEAN THAT IT DESERVES TO BE BANNED! IF A CARD IS BEING ABUSED AND IS UNHEALTHY TO THE METAGAME, THEN IT DESERVES TO BE BANNED. I was asked to comment, but I have nothing to say.......... I straight up disagree with Chaos, and Elsandero, your arguments could use work. The dark decks I've seen are horrible, if LaDD gets limited, then DMoC will not be as broken, and LaDD getting limited is more likely than DMoC getting banned, and it solves the problem of it being TOO cheap, and not just cheap. (if its a $15 when most cards are less than $15, it should be somewhat overpowered) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Under_Age_User Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 Chaos Pudding' date=' why do you say that every good card in this game have to be banned? It's like you just can't stand then/don't have it and has been used on you. It's like ''If you can't have it, nobody will''[/quote'] Maybe I should add the following comment to my sig. JUST BECAUSE A CARD IS GOOD DOES NOT MEAN THAT IT DESERVES TO BE BANNED! IF A CARD IS BEING ABUSED AND IS UNHEALTHY TO THE METAGAME, THEN IT DESERVES TO BE BANNED. I was asked to comment, but I have nothing to say.......... I straight up disagree with Chaos, and Elsandero, your arguments could use work. The dark decks I've seen are horrible, if LaDD gets limited, then DMoC will not be as broken, and LaDD getting limited is more likely than DMoC getting banned, and it solves the problem of it being TOO cheap, and not just cheap. (hey, if its a $15, it should be somewhat overpowered) How does LaDD have ANYTHING to do with DMoC? I've never see anyone use LaDD for anything other then Disk Commander. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 I was asked to comment' date=' but I have nothing to say.......... I straight up disagree with Chaos, and Elsandero, your arguments could use work. The dark decks I've seen are horrible, if LaDD gets limited, then DMoC will not be as broken, and LaDD getting limited is more likely than DMoC getting banned, and it solves the problem of it being TOO cheap, and not just cheap. (if its a $15 when most cards are less than $15, it should be somewhat overpowered)[/quote'] What does LaDD have to do with it? I've never seen a DMoC abuse deck use LaDD as part of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bfmvrocks Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 Another thread about a card being banned? Omg... He shouldn't be banned.There's combo's with him because he's a really good card.Doesn't mean he should get banned for it.What next, you want to ban a card you lose to again? "I got killed by Watapon, it should be banned!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 Another thread about a card being banned? Omg... He shouldn't be banned.There's combo's with him because he's a really good card.Doesn't mean he should get banned for it.What next' date=' you want to ban a card you lose to again? "I got killed by Watapon, it should be banned!"[/quote'] I'm sorry, but did I say anything about me loosing because of DMoC? The reasons for my calling for DMoC's banning have already been addressed earlier in this topic. And I've only advocated the banning of 3 cards. Can you tell me how many cards were added last list? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSceptile Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 You don't seem to understand. No one is saying DMoC should be banned because they lost to it. It should be banned because of the advantage that it gives you, and with these new support cards DMoC has become nigh invincible, will still granting massive amounts of advantage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 I was asked to comment' date=' but I have nothing to say.......... I straight up disagree with Chaos, and Elsandero, your arguments could use work. The dark decks I've seen are horrible, if LaDD gets limited, then DMoC will not be as broken, and LaDD getting limited is more likely than DMoC getting banned, and it solves the problem of it being TOO cheap, and not just cheap. (if its a $15 when most cards are less than $15, it should be somewhat overpowered)[/quote'] What does LaDD have to do with it? I've never seen a DMoC abuse deck use LaDD as part of it. it's because is easier to get a disk commander than a DMoC... and if you didn't even figure it out how to use and abuse with this cards... please consider if you have the right arguments to ban DMoC... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 I was asked to comment' date=' but I have nothing to say.......... I straight up disagree with Chaos, and Elsandero, your arguments could use work. The dark decks I've seen are horrible, if LaDD gets limited, then DMoC will not be as broken, and LaDD getting limited is more likely than DMoC getting banned, and it solves the problem of it being TOO cheap, and not just cheap. (if its a $15 when most cards are less than $15, it should be somewhat overpowered)[/quote'] What does LaDD have to do with it? I've never seen a DMoC abuse deck use LaDD as part of it. it's because is easier to get a disk commander than a DMoC... and if you didn't even figure it out how to use and abuse with this cards... please consider if you have the right arguments to ban DMoC... DMoC abuse does not center on LADD, and it's not because DMoC is hard to get. That would only even begin to make sense if you were saying why LADD abuse doesn't center on DMoC. This is the reverse; if you already have DMoC, how do you abuse it? LADD is not the answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Under_Age_User Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 I was asked to comment' date=' but I have nothing to say.......... I straight up disagree with Chaos, and Elsandero, your arguments could use work. The dark decks I've seen are horrible, if LaDD gets limited, then DMoC will not be as broken, and LaDD getting limited is more likely than DMoC getting banned, and it solves the problem of it being TOO cheap, and not just cheap. (if its a $15 when most cards are less than $15, it should be somewhat overpowered)[/quote'] What does LaDD have to do with it? I've never seen a DMoC abuse deck use LaDD as part of it. it's because is easier to get a disk commander than a DMoC... and if you didn't even figure it out how to use and abuse with this cards... please consider if you have the right arguments to ban DMoC... Once again: What does LaDD have to do with it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSceptile Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 The only thing that LaDD abusing is SSing from graveyard. But that's just once. With Premature, DDR, Escape From Dark Dimension, DMoC is abused to no end. DMoC granting you back a Spell card is icing on the cake. I can get back my Premy, or DDR and keep on bringing back DMoC, getting back Spell cards, and creating an infinite advantage loop. Infinite advantage loops aren't cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.