DL Posted December 12, 2011 Report Share Posted December 12, 2011 That's all good except for actually having the 3 god cards. And enough LP.LP isn't the problem at all And don't you see? There's so many cards that help you draw, and deck thin, getting the god cards is CHILD'S PLAY .-. As well as Xyzs that help you draw, so that could further stimulate gadgets. you can even use the XYZs you've summoned to summon a god card (so as to save yourself 1500 LP) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted December 12, 2011 Report Share Posted December 12, 2011 LP isn't the problem at all And don't you see? There's so many cards that help you draw, and deck thin, getting the god cards is CHILD'S PLAY .-. As well as Xyzs that help you draw, so that could further stimulate gadgets. you can even use the XYZs you've summoned to summon a god card (so as to save yourself 1500 LP)Except it's really not that easy. Just ask Icy. He tried and failed to beat a simple Slifer deck three times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted December 12, 2011 Report Share Posted December 12, 2011 he failed to BEAT a slifer deck? As in slifer gadgets? Also it sure looks easy to me Gadgets and stuff thin monstersspells thin spells you're only left with god cards .-. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted December 12, 2011 Report Share Posted December 12, 2011 he failed to BEAT a slifer deck? As in slifer gadgets? Also it sure looks easy to me Gadgets and stuff thin monstersspells thin spells you're only left with god cards .-.Good in Theory =/= Good in Practice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted December 12, 2011 Report Share Posted December 12, 2011 Well apparently my deck is good in practice as well All you need is a gadget, ultimate offering, and a pinch of luck I dueled like 8 times with this deck so far It only lost 3 times, and 2 of those was against an anti-search deck that runs Whangu in side :T Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted December 12, 2011 Report Share Posted December 12, 2011 Well apparently my deck is good in practice as well All you need is a gadget, ultimate offering, and a pinch of luck I dueled like 8 times with this deck so far It only lost 3 times, and 2 of those was against an anti-search deck that runs Whangu in side :TUm... you know that you don't get to draw from <i think it's called appropriate> with hand destruction, right? Cause it's "send" not "discard"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted December 12, 2011 Report Share Posted December 12, 2011 ...Cept...it's when your opponent draws cards outside his/her draw phase, you draw 2 cards sssso yeah send/discard has nothing to do with it :'o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skyfi Posted December 12, 2011 Report Share Posted December 12, 2011 Username: SkyfiDN username: SkyfireFavorite Yu-Gi-Oh! card: Rainbow Dragon or Dark Paladin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Βyakuya Posted December 12, 2011 Report Share Posted December 12, 2011 Well apparently my deck is good in practice as well All you need is a gadget, ultimate offering, and a pinch of luck I dueled like 8 times with this deck so far It only lost 3 times, and 2 of those was against an anti-search deck that runs Whangu in side :T Adding some Monster Reincarnations would be nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiri Tsukikawa Posted December 13, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2011 Username: SkyfiDN username: SkyfireFavorite Yu-Gi-Oh! card: Rainbow Dragon or Dark PaladinAccepted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted December 13, 2011 Report Share Posted December 13, 2011 Adding some Monster Reincarnations would be nice.For some reason I find those completely unecessary, since Emeral and Pot of Avarice return my gadgets to my deck anyway (which is where I want them) AND let me draw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Βyakuya Posted December 13, 2011 Report Share Posted December 13, 2011 Oh that's true. I was thinking of my deck for a bit...I would like to play against that deck and see how well it works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted December 13, 2011 Report Share Posted December 13, 2011 Oh that's true. I was thinking of my deck for a bit...I would like to play against that deck and see how well it works.It works amazingly (I'd say tier 1-1.5 level) The only flaw is that it depends too much on ultimate offering :T It WOULD be fun to play you tho :3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted December 13, 2011 Report Share Posted December 13, 2011 That is most certainly not Tier 1. And... you're running Infinite Cards? ._. Gadgets have far more consistent builds... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted December 13, 2011 Report Share Posted December 13, 2011 Correction, I RAN infinite cards. It slows it down too much, and considering it goes for the OTK, I don't really need it. And it's not tier one BECAUSE of the weakness of Ultimate Offering-dependence, if they release a spell version of ultimate offering, it'll be much easier to use. Plus, that IS a consistent build If it doesn't get Creator God of Light, it gets any of the three gods, and if not those, I can kill my opponent by Xyz swarm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spellcaster2000 Posted December 13, 2011 Report Share Posted December 13, 2011 Username: Spellcaster2000DN username: Spellcaster2000Favorite Yu-Gi-Oh! card: Not sure... Btw if I'm accepted my deck is called 'Ninja Ambush' and, obviously, uses the ninja archetype. 'cause, you know, ninjas are epic pwnage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
☖☠☗JAXCOB☗☠☖ Posted December 13, 2011 Report Share Posted December 13, 2011 Username: Spellcaster2000DN username: Spellcaster2000Favorite Yu-Gi-Oh! card: Not sure... Btw if I'm accepted my deck is called 'Ninja Ambush' and, obviously, uses the ninja archetype. 'cause, you know, ninjas are epic pwnage.In hun.In. ;D Also,My god deck is dull. :^D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted December 13, 2011 Report Share Posted December 13, 2011 ...How is it dull? O.o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceDorago Posted December 13, 2011 Report Share Posted December 13, 2011 I use Godmonarchs becuase I was too stupid to realize Slifer Gadgets were better. But with it including the Plant engine and stuff it's not bad honestly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiri Tsukikawa Posted December 13, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2011 Username: Spellcaster2000DN username: Spellcaster2000Favorite Yu-Gi-Oh! card: Not sure... Btw if I'm accepted my deck is called 'Ninja Ambush' and, obviously, uses the ninja archetype. 'cause, you know, ninjas are epic pwnage. Are you sure it's not another site?Or the wrong username? [spoiler=Spellcaster2000 on DN] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LC Posted December 13, 2011 Report Share Posted December 13, 2011 Since when did Slifer get made into an actual legal card? Might try to make a god deck later I guess. It'll be terrible since I'm terrible at Yu-Gi-Oh! 8D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
☖☠☗JAXCOB☗☠☖ Posted December 13, 2011 Report Share Posted December 13, 2011 ...How is it dull? O.oNo cool cards. ;DSince when did Slifer get made into an actual legal card? Might try to make a god deck later I guess. It'll be terrible since I'm terrible at Yu-Gi-Oh! 8DNo idea.Make a dck,and dool me with it. 8D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LC Posted December 13, 2011 Report Share Posted December 13, 2011 No idea.Make a dck,and dool me with it. 8D Mkay. I'll be back in a few. 8D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceDorago Posted December 13, 2011 Report Share Posted December 13, 2011 It became legit a few days ago like Horkathy. Keep up people. xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chiri Tsukikawa Posted December 13, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2011 I thought it was, Horakhty. =D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.