Twenty-five Zero Oh-oh Posted May 30, 2011 Report Share Posted May 30, 2011 Shortest possible title chosen specially for seta There's something about the tag that isn't working. I'm probably gonna post a new version soon so stay tuned. ^^ [spoiler='Old'][img]http://img834.imageshack.us/img834/5686/002st.png[/img][/spoiler] [img]http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/5686/002st.png[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simping For Hina Posted May 30, 2011 Report Share Posted May 30, 2011 Amazing. But kind of empty on the left side. View point is more towards the fractals. Blend is good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted May 30, 2011 Report Share Posted May 30, 2011 Fractals on the very left seem very plonked-on. Render's the same but less so. Otherwise, quite nice. Love the few fractals in the middle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cin Posted May 30, 2011 Report Share Posted May 30, 2011 Change the title. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chairman ali Posted May 31, 2011 Report Share Posted May 31, 2011 ^ Why the hassle? Its just a title you know.. no need to be strict. Your lighting pretty much isn't getting any better :\ you're over contrasting it and eliminating it's shades. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seta Posted May 31, 2011 Report Share Posted May 31, 2011 tbh I don't like it, it seems flat and boring. You should try to add some depth and feeling to it somehow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twenty-five Zero Oh-oh Posted May 31, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 31, 2011 [quote name='CAVEMAN.' timestamp='1306837652' post='5243892'] ^ Why the hassle? Its just a title you know.. no need to be strict. Your lighting pretty much isn't getting any better :\ you're over contrasting it and eliminating it's shades. [/quote] Yh I realize there's something wrong with my lighting but I'm not sure I understand how to fix it. Sry if this is really nooby but what do you mean by eliminating shades? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chairman ali Posted May 31, 2011 Report Share Posted May 31, 2011 Well even light sources fade out eventually. Think of it like this. Strong, mild, weak. Each of these categories have 3 sub-categories. [list] [*]Strong: Full power, Strong, Infant strength. [*]Mild: Powerfully mild, Subsequently mild, Eventual mild. [*]Weak: Weakly visible, mildly visible, death. [/list] Each category goes from strong to light. However, light comes in many shapes and forms. BUT it is always strong from the core. [b]The nuclei[/b]. So basically what I'm trying to show here that your effects are blotches rather than correct lighting sequences. I hope this helps you and makes it a bit more clear Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twenty-five Zero Oh-oh Posted June 1, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 1, 2011 Oh... I see. My lighting tends to look weird cuz I have sources everywhere and they only affect little zones. Thx for the explanation. ED: New version. Idk, Imo it looks a little better although the lighting at the bottom still feels off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.