Under_Age_User Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 Snipe Hunter should be banned. Although I could state my case in a well organized essay, I think the discussion would work better as a guided excercise. Basically, someone states their opinion, and actually backs it up and then we will continue until the topic has us reaching a conclusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaco Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 Fair enough. You give up 1 card (-1) on a 2/3rds chance that you'll destroy one of their cards So there is a 2 in 3 chance that you'll get a 1-1, And a 1 in 3 chance that you'll just waste one of your cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uzumakinaruto93 Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 no i think its good at limited, cause it has a cost and can often end in u discarding a card for no reason...but the fact that it can destroy any card on the field kinda makes it so that it almost fall of the cliff, but its pretty weak stats pull it back up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoolMeNever Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 I don't think it should be banned. Limited is fine for me, if you discard and you roll a 1 or 6, you just wasted a card that you might have used later on in the duel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Under_Age_User Posted February 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 Fair enough. You give up 1 card (-1) on a 2/3rds chance that you'll destroy one of their cards So there is a 2 in 3 chance that you'll get a 1-1' date=' And a 1 in 3 chance that you'll just waste one of your cards.[/quote'] It systematically forces activation of any chainable spells and traps for no reason. Since your opponent doesn't know how the dice will spin, and rather then being at a 1-1 loss, they'd be forced to chain stuff. Also, their are so many cards in the metagame that are much more useful in the graveyard. Destiny Hero Disk Commander, Malicious, Treeborn Frog, and Dasher to an extent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Under_Age_User Posted February 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 I don't think it should be banned. Limited is fine for me' date=' if you discard and you roll a 1 or 6, you just wasted a card that you might have used later on in the duel.[/quote'] It depends entirely on what you discard. An experienced duelist won't throw out whatever card they have in their hand. They choose what is discarded, dead cards in their hands into 1-1 bullets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donquixote Doflamingo Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 i agree with the others cause it got as good effect but ATK and DEF rubbish! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaco Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 What if they do chain? (MST, for example)Now you're at -2. Some cards are better in the Grave, but in most decks it could put you at a major disadvantage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donquixote Doflamingo Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 he's got a point! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Under_Age_User Posted February 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 i agree with the others cause it got as good effect but ATK and DEF rubbish! It's attack and defense are what make it great. It's searchable by Sangan, Mystic Tomato, and Dark Burst. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Under_Age_User Posted February 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 What if they do chain? (MST' date=' for example)Now you're at -2. Some cards are better in the Grave, but in most decks it could put you at a major disadvantage.[/quote'] 1: That's only if you have a spell or trap. Second of all, could we get off situtional combos?2: It's your own fault for building a terrible deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donquixote Doflamingo Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 well, it's hard to draw the card ya need! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest nwslap12 Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 I think it should be banned. it is four star, the cost is small, and it cant be destroyed if you just have ring of protection or level limit area b ( if those arent banned. i dont check the list) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaco Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 What if they do chain? (MST' date=' for example)Now you're at -2. Some cards are better in the Grave, but in most decks it could put you at a major disadvantage.[/quote'] 1: That's only if you have a spell or trap. Second of all, could we get off situtional combos?2: It's your own fault for building a terrible deck. Wasn't your example on forced chaining referring to Spells? Come now, I thought this would be a civil discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
megamaster125 Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 I think it should be banned for a few reasons: 1. It can target any card.2. It's highly searchable, not to mention the dark support from Phantom Darkness.3. The difference between winning and losing could come down to Snipe Hunter's dice role. I don't like winning/losing based on the role of a die. Don't get me wrong, there are dice/coin based cards that are fine (blowback dragon), but snipe hunter has much more impact on a game, too much impact for a luck based effect imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Under_Age_User Posted February 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 What if they do chain? (MST' date=' for example)Now you're at -2. Some cards are better in the Grave, but in most decks it could put you at a major disadvantage.[/quote'] 1: That's only if you have a spell or trap. Second of all, could we get off situtional combos?2: It's your own fault for building a terrible deck. Wasn't your example on forced chaining referring to Spells? Come now, I thought this would be a civil discussion. Spells and traps. Traps can still be activated on your opponents turn... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 i think that Limited is fine for it. too damn bored to argue *yawns*. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 it is a basic 1 for 1, but theres a chance it doesnt work, and theres also a chance you won't have enough cards to ruin your opponent. but in most situations it will ruin your opponent with one try. it can also pitch Frog, Disk Commander, Malicious, others. so yes, i believe it should be banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 it is a basic 1 for 1' date=' but theres a chance it doesnt work, and theres also a chance you won't have enough cards to ruin your opponent. but in most situations it will ruin your opponent with one try. it can also pitch Frog, Disk Commander, Malicious, others. so yes, i believe it should be banned.[/quote'] but the chances of tha are 2/6. not the best odds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 thats 1/3. pretty good chance. not quite 50/50, but close. trust me, i've wasted plenty of cards getting that 1/3. i think the fact the snipey here can pitch the cards i mentioned above gives you advantage anyways, even if you miss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 Encourages unskilled play; turns any dead card in hand into an instant 2/3 crapshoot against any card on the field. Multi-use per turn and hitting both rows puts it over the top. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Slime Lord Posted February 7, 2008 Report Share Posted February 7, 2008 Snipe Hunter should be banned. Ah, we agree on something for once. I really don't like Snipe Hunter. Talk about a game changing card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.