Realistic Card(s)

[Aaron Gleeson]

Hey Joined this forum a while ago and wanted to ask some advice. I have this card and do plan to make a few others in a while. I would like to check if it's balanced and worded well and properly. I'd also like some advice on correct artwork and how to go about making it, what programs are best...? ect Thanks for your feedback!

[img]http://img641.imageshack.us/img641/7707/345841.jpg[/img]

So what do you think? Too unrealistic? Too stupid? Too powerful? Any ideas what picture would look good here and how to go about making it?

[Stoopid1]

I think it would be too stupid, and easily ban-worthy. All you'd have to do is fill your deck with nothing but draw spells so that you'd be virtually guaranteed to find this card, and automatically win as a result of passing off an unplayable deck. It's different from something like Exodia, in that needing only this 1 card gives you a lot more freedom to play cycling effects like Card Destruction, and replicators like Thunder Dragon / Toon Table + Hand Destructions to throw them away.

[DJGaulks]

I'ts pretty cool but I think it should have a picture. you could all ways put it in the written cards section of the forums

[Aaron Gleeson]

[quote name='DJGaulks' timestamp='1304850394' post='5195658']
I'ts pretty cool but I think it should have a picture. you could all ways put it in the written cards section of the forums
[/quote]

Ok, I have a picture made for it. Where should i go/what should I do now? Can I put it up here?

[Bringerofcake]

A)"Trade decks with your opponent. This card's effect cannot be negated by Spell Cards."
is all you need to say. It's implied with the fact that it is a continuous spell that you trade back when it's destroyed.
B) Written Cards means NO picture. At. All.
C) The card itself, while admirable in the effort, is too easily abused. Imagine that you run a deck with Magical Merchant, 1 of these, and the rest monsters. Merchant mills until you get the card, and then you swap with your opponent. Your opponent has half a deck of nigh unusable monsters, and no way to stop you from keeping his deck for the rest of the game.

[color="#FFFFFF"]A poor example, I know, but still, card is ridiculous.[/color]

[Aaron Gleeson]

[quote name='A Veritable Truth' timestamp='1304918757' post='5198160']
A)"Trade decks with your opponent. This card's effect cannot be negated by Spell Cards."
is all you need to say. It's implied with the fact that it is a continuous spell that you trade back when it's destroyed.
Written Cards means NO picture. At. All.
C) The card itself, while admirable in the effort, is too easily abused. Imagine that you run a deck with Magical Merchant, 1 of these, and the rest monsters. Merchant mills until you get the card, and then you swap with your opponent. Your opponent has half a deck of nigh unusable monsters, and no way to stop you from keeping his deck for the rest of the game.

[color="#FFFFFF"]A poor example, I know, but still, card is ridiculous.[/color]
[/quote]

Ok, "A Veritable Truth" I have two prototype pictures of the card. Can I upload it with the revised version of the card and picture here or do I go somewhere else?

[Bringerofcake]

Do it in Realistic, or Any Other Cards. And try to avoid using attachments. They're looked down upon here.

[Aaron Gleeson]

[quote name='A Veritable Truth' timestamp='1304972037' post='5199034']
Do it in Realistic, or Any Other Cards. And try to avoid using attachments. They're looked down upon here.
[/quote]

Ok Thank you. Please take a look at the revised version when it's posted. I'd like your input