megamaster125 Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 I feel a lot of tention in the air (well, in this topic). Can we all just try to get along? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jib Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 That quote was out of context. The same thing was repeated at least 3 times. The user in question claimed himself that he didn't read the topic. Are we the bad guys because we are new or because we disturbed your little hierarchical order of truth and mindless following? All we ever asked is that you backed up your claims in the matter specifically discussed in said topic. What you as Trolling or Flaming, we view this as being persistent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Slime Lord Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 feel a lot of tention in the air (well, in this topic). Can we all just try to get along? I'm fine with that. Let's just see what Jib, RedSceptile, PikaPerson01, and Crab Helmet what do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 I feel a lot of tention in the air (well' date=' in this topic). Can we all just try to get along?[/quote'] tention, tention indeed. perhaps we could, if your group hadnt come on here and immediately begun arguing with everyone as quickly as possible. your group appears to think they are better than us, because you know more about a children's trading card game. but i'm all for ending the arguing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 We came because we heard there was an argument and because we were bored. >_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frunk Posted February 6, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 The noobness oozing out of this topic is astounding. (Who said that now) I recall someone calling us a moron. Yes you guys are totally innocenet and haven't done a thing. If you have any evidence to support this sarcastic claim please put it forward. Apparently' date=' we have different definitions of "flaming". We define flaming to mean things such as "You are an idiot". From what I can see, around here, it seems to mean such things as "You are completely wrong". Is that a fair analysis?[/quote'] No, because you have done nothing wrong yet. You are missing the point of my announcement. I'm a peace-enforcer. That quote was out of context. The same thing was repeated at least 3 times. The user in question claimed himself that he didn't read the topic. Are we the bad guys because we are new or because we disturbed your little hierarchical order of truth and mindless following? All we ever asked is that you backed up your claims in the matter specifically discussed in said topic. What you as Trolling or Flaming' date=' we view this as being persistent.[/quote'] You're quite hypocrytical, I am yet to view any of your behaviour at all. You are jumping to conclusions and acting very hostile quite prematurely, you should save it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 actually, you came, and THEN there was an argument... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 Apparently' date=' we have different definitions of "flaming". We define flaming to mean things such as "You are an idiot". From what I can see, around here, it seems to mean such things as "You are completely wrong". Is that a fair analysis?[/quote'] No, because you have done nothing wrong yet. You are missing the point of my announcement. I'm a peace-enforcer. I was referring to the examples of alleged flaming put forward by the old-timers, not to the rules themselves.actually' date=' you came, and THEN there was an argument...[/quote'] Nope, we definitely arrived because of the Arms Hole topic. Actually, I can see how the final post of the Fusion Gate topic could be perceived as trolling by someone with no sense of humour, but since nobody seems to have read it anyway, I doubt that counts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaco Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 Apparently' date=' we have different definitions of "flaming". We define flaming to mean things such as "You are an idiot". From what I can see, around here, it seems to mean such things as "You are completely wrong". Is that a fair analysis?[/quote'] No, because you have done nothing wrong yet. You are missing the point of my announcement. I'm a peace-enforcer. I was referring to the examples of alleged flaming put forward by the old-timers, not to the rules themselves.actually' date=' you came, and THEN there was an argument...[/quote'] Nope, we definitely arrived because of the Arms Hole topic. Arguably, the Arm's Hole topic was more of a discussion and less of an argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 Apparently' date=' we have different definitions of "flaming". We define flaming to mean things such as "You are an idiot". From what I can see, around here, it seems to mean such things as "You are completely wrong". Is that a fair analysis?[/quote'] No, because you have done nothing wrong yet. You are missing the point of my announcement. I'm a peace-enforcer. I was referring to the examples of alleged flaming put forward by the old-timers, not to the rules themselves.actually' date=' you came, and THEN there was an argument...[/quote'] Nope, we definitely arrived because of the Arms Hole topic. Arguably, the Arm's Hole topic was more of a discussion and less of an argument. I strongly disagree. It was definitely an argument. People were arguing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 okay, now that you have won an argument on the internet with people you will never meet, you can go back to playing Xbox or whatever you were doing before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Slime Lord Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 I thought we were all going to stop bickering? Now we're arguing about whether or not we were arguing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frunk Posted February 6, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 Apparently' date=' we have different definitions of "flaming". We define flaming to mean things such as "You are an idiot". From what I can see, around here, it seems to mean such things as "You are completely wrong". Is that a fair analysis?[/quote'] No, because you have done nothing wrong yet. You are missing the point of my announcement. I'm a peace-enforcer. I was referring to the examples of alleged flaming put forward by the old-timers, not to the rules themselves. Are you afraid of them? The "old-timers", as you put it. Currently the only thing they have on their side is a small amount of influence, otherwise they are powerless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSceptile Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 KA Flame Wrote:no, if you think it should, then you are truly a moron.... The Slime Lord Wrote:The noobness oozing out of this topic is astounding. Treeborn is pretty good, but it definitely doesn't deserve to be banned. By using Treeborn's effect, you cannot protect yourself with Spells and Traps, making your opponent and their Monarchs they got via Frog's effect very vulnerable. Frog is also perfect food for Hydros. Attack it with one, get another and attack directly for 1600 damage. They won't have any Traps or anything down because they're hoping to use Frog's effect. There are more things you can do to Frog that can screw with your opponent, but I won't mention them all. I only mentioned the first few that came to me first. So before you (the thread creator) go around and say "ZOMG, Treeborn Frog iz teh overpoweredz banzzzzz", realize that Treeborn has just as many weaknesses as it does advantages. Well, not exactly, but it does have some weaknesses. Here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Slime Lord Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 The Slime Lord Wrote:The noobness oozing out of this topic is astounding. Treeborn is pretty good' date=' but it definitely doesn't deserve to be banned. By using Treeborn's effect, you cannot protect yourself with Spells and Traps, making your opponent and their Monarchs they got via Frog's effect very vulnerable. Frog is also perfect food for Hydros. Attack it with one, get another and attack directly for 1600 damage. They won't have any Traps or anything down because they're hoping to use Frog's effect. There are more things you can do to Frog that can screw with your opponent, but I won't mention them all. I only mentioned the first few that came to me first. So before you (the thread creator) go around and say "ZOMG, Treeborn Frog iz teh overpoweredz banzzzzz", realize that Treeborn has just as many weaknesses as it does advantages. Well, not exactly, but it does have some weaknesses.[/quote'] Here. I kinda admitted I said that already.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jib Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 okay' date=' now that you have won an argument on the internet with people you will never meet, you can go back to playing Xbox or whatever you were doing before.[/quote'] And we're the hostiles... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaco Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 I thought we were all going to stop bickering? Now we're arguing about whether or not we were arguing. Lol. Yeah' date=' I'm dropping out of this discussion You were never really important in this discussion anyways! ... well screw you too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 Apparently' date=' we have different definitions of "flaming". We define flaming to mean things such as "You are an idiot". From what I can see, around here, it seems to mean such things as "You are completely wrong". Is that a fair analysis?[/quote'] No, because you have done nothing wrong yet. You are missing the point of my announcement. I'm a peace-enforcer. I was referring to the examples of alleged flaming put forward by the old-timers, not to the rules themselves. Are you afraid of them? The "old-timers", as you put it. Currently the only thing they have on their side is a small amount of influence, otherwise they are powerless. I believe what my friend is asking is, how is flaming defined on this board? From the boards we come from, words such as "you are stupid" would be counted as flaming, while words such as "you are wrong" would not be counted as flaming, and merely a debate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 okay then. congratulations. you have won the argument between yourselves and a group of random people on the internet who you have not met nor will you ever meet. congratulations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frunk Posted February 6, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 okay' date=' now that you have won an argument on the internet with people you will never meet, you can go back to playing Xbox or whatever you were doing before.[/quote'] And we're the hostiles... You're quite annoying, sorry. You have not been declared hostile by anyone of importance. I know not why you are reading this thread? 'Think that claiming Monster Gate was the best card ever was the chance for another "heated discussion"? Nothing made you obligated to read this thread, or any other threads, but you have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
megamaster125 Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 I believe what my friend is asking is' date=' how is flaming defined on this board? From the boards we come from, words such as "you are stupid" would be counted as flaming, while words such as "you are wrong" would not be counted as flaming, and merely a debate.[/quote'] Well, if it's just meant as harmless debate, I don't see what the problem is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abstract [Atrocity] Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 okay then. congratulations. you have won the argument between yourselves and a group of random people on the internet who you have not met nor will you ever meet. congratulations. lol HORUS :LOL: All 4 of those guys just came on to YCM to show offtheir so-called "prowess" at YGO, trying to prove they're better than everyone here. If thats what you want, looksomewhere else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frunk Posted February 6, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 I remember what happened last time a group of stangers claimed that a card-making forum should focus on the TCG. They started many arguments, tried to take over the site, and were quite comprehensively banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 Frunk, that sounds familiar. not like i was involved or anything... yes, please go be dicks at Duelistgroundz. this is a FRIENDLY forum about CREATING YOUR OWN CARDS. we are not the most talented duelists. we dont care for insults. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jib Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 Ladies and gentlemen' date='It has come to my attention that there are a few certain new members who are not making the biggest impression on some of our older members.[/quote'] That's what I saw when I came in this thread. Why shouldn't I read the thread when it's obviously aimed at me and my "new peers". Wasn't that the whole point of the exercise? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.