The Slime Lord Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 It's getting slightly annoying. I have a feeling I'm being mocked also. :? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSceptile Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 I'll be frank and completely honest. Atem wanted to prove you wrong completely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaco Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 I mean, it's just the same thing you've been trying to do this whole time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jib Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 You're not mocked, it's called "being proved wrong" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Slime Lord Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 Okay. Now that Atem (whoever that is) has proved me completely wrong, what are you and Atem going to do now? Continue this debate? It's really not getting anywhere anymore. This can be locked now. There is nothing constructive coming out of this anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Best Male 2008 Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 you have proved nothing, just saying its a free summon..... and both sides have been wrong, i have just simply sided with the non banning side, why? who knows... seeing as both sides have ONLY posted counters banners: with their "already banned cards" you have onnly posted counters, not the REASON why they were band non banners: have only posted counters ALL cards have disadvantages, except for banned ones, which is why they are banned so stop the whole debate and shut up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bfmvrocks Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 Why do you constantly complain and argue? It goes good in a certain Deck.Doesn't mean it should be banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jib Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 you have proved nothing' date=' just saying its a free summon..... and both sides have been wrong, i have just simply sided with the non banning side, why? who knows... seeing as both sides have ONLY posted counters banners: with their "already banned cards" you have onnly posted counters, not the REASON why they were band non banners: have only posted counters ALL cards have disadvantages, except for banned ones, which is why they are banned so stop the whole debate and shut up.[/quote'] There's a fatal flaw in there : I never stated anywhere that I wanted Frog banned, did I? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSceptile Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 [00:20] ?: Tell them I'm just an everyday average duelist who tells the truth and doesn't like any one card any more than any other.[00:21] ?: It's because of my lack of bias and ability to play this game no matter how good or bad the Prohibitions and Limitations are that I can make truly proper judgments based on all factors. Well, to be truthful I don't see how we can debate any more when there is nothing to debate right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Slime Lord Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 This can be locked now. There is nothing constructive coming out of this anymore. I don't like quoting myself, unless someone says something new that hasn't been said before, this should just be locked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Best Male 2008 Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 you have proved nothing' date=' just saying its a free summon..... and both sides have been wrong, i have just simply sided with the non banning side, why? who knows... seeing as both sides have ONLY posted counters banners: with their "already banned cards" you have onnly posted counters, not the REASON why they were band non banners: have only posted counters ALL cards have disadvantages, except for banned ones, which is why they are banned so stop the whole debate and shut up.[/quote'] There's a fatal flaw in there : I never stated anywhere that I wanted Frog banned, did I? now did I say that, i just simply named both sides....read carefully buddy...now everyone shut up so this can be locked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 The discussion is over whether Treeborn Frog should be banned or not. We've already given you examples of why it should be. It produces instant +1s, allowing tributes to be played, that normally took a bit of work to get out. Your counter example of "it can be stopped by X, Y, Z!" was refuted with: "So can every other card on the banlist" So... rebuttal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 NOBODY CARES ANYMORE TREEBORN WILL NOT BE BANNED, I GUARANTEE IT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Definitely Not XxHEXSORxX Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 He's the entire argument thus far in a nutshell: Ban side: Unlimited +1s.Anti-Ban Side: The fact you can't set S/Ts make up for the +1s.Ban Side: Smart players know when to set traps that can be used before their next Standby Phase.Anti-Ban Side: Well, The card is easily countered by D.D. Crow.Ban Side: Chaos Emperor Dragon is also countered by D.D. Crow. What's your point?Anti-Ban Side: That's not fair... You can't compare Chaos Emperor Dragon and Treeborn Frog.Ban Side: Why not?Anti-Ban Side: Because Chaos Emperor Dragon is broken.Ban Side: So is Treeborn... *Return to the inifinite +1s* After reading that, tell me if you think Treeborn should be banned or not... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSceptile Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 NOBODY CARES ANYMORE TREEBORN WILL NOT BE BANNED' date=' I GUARANTEE IT[/quote'] Don't ever say that. That's the same thing that people said about Chaos Sorcerror, and Confiscation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaco Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 NOBODY CARES ANYMORE TREEBORN WILL NOT BE BANNED' date=' I GUARANTEE IT[/quote'] Don't ever say that. That's the same thing that people said about Chaos Sorcerror, and Confiscation. Good point, I never would've expected Chaos Sorcerer when it was still legal. I figured they'd stop after the took out the Envoys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abstract [Atrocity] Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 This should be locked... It's just a bunch of people repeating the same stuff,over and over and over again. Ther'es no point in arguing. Is there a prizefor winning? No. Everyone should just return to their business and this becomes locked... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaco Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 I'm cool with that, I should get some sleep anyways ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jib Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 THIS JUST IN GUYZ THIS FORUM DOES NOT SUPPORT DEBATE. PACK UP AND GO HOME Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 The prize is knowledge, and a better understanding of the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Definitely Not XxHEXSORxX Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 you have proved nothing' date=' just saying its a free summon..... and both sides have been wrong, i have just simply sided with the non banning side, why? who knows... seeing as both sides have ONLY posted counters banners: with their "already banned cards" you have onnly posted counters, not the REASON why they were band non banners: have only posted counters ALL cards have disadvantages, except for banned ones, which is why they are banned so stop the whole debate and shut up.[/quote'] @The banner's comment: We only posted counters because your justification behind treeborn not being broken was that he was easily countered. @The non-banner's comment: They posted a few reasons (The no S/Ts can be considered a reason and not just a counter). But I would like to add that the infinite +1s thing was really yet to be countered... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wardecked Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 Rule 8 No whining Whining is defined as "an attack upon an idea, concept or problem, without offering a counter-idea, alternative concept, or a solution" or anything along the lines of "It's not fair". Any and all whining is prohibited. Ideas are welcome, however, attacking ideas without offering constructive criticism is counter productive. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 banned? no what did it do to you? Treeborn makes Monarchs own Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wardecked Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 Change of Heart and Snatch Steal also make Monarchs own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackieChun Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 Saying that keeping something just for the sake that it makes Monarchs good is a reason not to ban something is probably the worst reason ANYONE could come up with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.