Jump to content

Fact: Only MST and (maybe) Mirror Force qualify as staples.


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Guest PikaPerson01

if you have to netdeck to make a good deck' date=' you are not a good player.

[/quote']

 

If you can not make a good deck, you are not a good player.

 

However, if learning from watching/playtesting a deck makes you a bad player... lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how about posting one of your own decks? if youre as good as you appear to be, post one of your own.

 

Oh this is how we mesure e-peen around here? By how we change 4 cards in a deck and call it our own?

 

Sorry bud, usually I'll judge someone's skills based on his/her knowledge. And with what I've seen so far...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest PikaPerson01

you guys are complete jerks. seriously. are you just on here to harass people? if you want to just steal someone else's deck and call it your own' date=' and use NO skill to build a deck or learn how to play better, you arent gaining ANYTHING.

[/quote']

 

Welcome to the internet!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest PikaPerson01

Like HORUS said' date=' Torrential Tribute :)

[/quote']

 

Decks focused on OTK-ing, such as Dark Gaia, DDT, and Demise do not run Torrential Tribute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll just add my 2 cents in.

 

It all depends on how you define staple. Me personally, I define it as a card that could easily fit into a large variety of decks. large variety = all, as burn and deck-out are exceptions to a lot of what I'm about to list. Here's my list of staples by my definition:

 

Monsters

 

Sangan

Breaker

Spirit Reaper

Chimeratech Fortress Dragon

 

Spells

 

Heavy Storm

MST

Smashing Ground

Fissure

Premature Burial

 

Traps

 

Mirror Force

Call of the Haunted

Torrential Tribute

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Show me a good deck that doesn't have MST and I'll concede the point.

 

Sorry for the delay, I was eating dinner.

The answer is a Spell Economics OTK deck. Yeah, sure, it's not common, but it's viable.

If I were running Spell Economics OTK, I'd drop MST for Twister. Multiple copies of MST that take 500 LP to activate when Spell Economics is not on the Field but are otherwise exactly the same is, in my (probably not so great) opinion, better than one copy of MST.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest PikaPerson01

Pikaperson: you may not have realized this yet' date=' but some of us enjoy having fun while playing this game.

[/quote']

 

Except you forgot the fact where I stated I only focused on pure winning. I love the strategic element, and Lady Luck can make the best of us lose to a poorly made Zombie deck like yours.

 

Sorry for the delay' date=' I was eating dinner.

The answer is a Spell Economics OTK deck. Yeah, sure, it's not common, but it's viable.

If I were running Spell Economics OTK, I'd drop MST for Twister. Multiple copies of MST that take 500 LP to activate when Spell Economics is not on the Field but are otherwise exactly the same is, in my (probably not so great) opinion, better than one copy of MST.

[/quote']

 

So a card that destroys only FACE UP spells and traps and needs a continuous spell on the field, in order to just barely be on the same level as MST would be used over MST?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

are you only here to harass people who arent as good as you?

 

go join Duelistgroundz like every other dick who thinks playing a children's card game makes you better than others.

 

 

this is the Yugioh Card Maker website. you know, for making cards. for fun. not a site for competing to be the best card game player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest PikaPerson01

are you only here to harass people who arent as good as you?

 

go join Duelistgroundz like every other dick who thinks playing a children's card game makes you better than others.

 

 

this is the Yugioh Card Maker website. you know' date=' for making cards. for fun. not a site for competing to be the best card game player.

[/quote']

 

Wouldn't the point in ANY game be for the player to get progressively better, so that you can challenge better, stronger opponents?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...