Chimeratech Fortress Dragon: Discussion

[megamaster125]

Here's my reason: Not everybody runs machine monsters.

 

And that's a good reason because it's true. Kthnx bi.

 

That is true, in which case CFD just sits in your fusion deck and does not interfere with your main deck. There is no harm to putting CFD in your fusion deck.

[Guest PikaPerson01]

Here's my reason: Not everybody runs machine monsters.

 

And that's a good reason because it's true. Kthnx bi.

 

Except... plenty of people play Cyber Dragon. Plenty of people play Jinzo. Plenty of people play Card Trooper. Even a 2000 attack Fortress Dragon, if it was built from your opponents, is pure advantage. And if you DO happen to face a Machine deck?

[Boss Z]

I NEVER run my machine deck... or atleast out of 100 battles i'd run it in like 7...

[RedSceptile]

You guys are forgetting cards like Jinzo, Cyber Dragon, Card Trooper, and soon to be a terror Cyber Valley.

 

CFD is essentially advantage at one of its purest forms.

 

It is costing you essentially nothing (unless you throw one of your machines into the mix) to run it.

 

If you look at the decks that are Top 16 if the players don't maindeck Cyber Dragon ir Jinzo, they probably sidedeck them. Now how can you honestly tell me a card that costs you nothing to run in your deck, and can clear your opponent's field isn't good?

[Flame Dragon]

Boss Z, sorry to sound rude but read what others write. DNA Surgery would make it so everything is Machine. Granted it can be destroyed easliy, but you only need it for a turn. Plus why does it matter. It's not affecting your deck's size. Over all, I think it's great.

[Zeppeli Gyro Supreme]

Here's my reason: Not everybody runs machine monsters.

 

And that's a good reason because it's true. Kthnx bi.

 

Wow' date=' that's probably the worst reason ever. I mean, it's Fusion. Why not run something that doesn't even take room in your card numbers?

[/quote']

Ah, but why do it? You waste money =O

[Guest PikaPerson01]

Here's my reason: Not everybody runs machine monsters.

 

And that's a good reason because it's true. Kthnx bi.

 

Wow' date=' that's probably the worst reason ever. I mean, it's Fusion. Why not run something that doesn't even take room in your card numbers?

[/quote']

Ah, but why do it? You waste money =O

 

ITT: Epic debating skills.

[Zeppeli Gyro Supreme]

Here's my reason: Not everybody runs machine monsters.

 

And that's a good reason because it's true. Kthnx bi.

 

Wow' date=' that's probably the worst reason ever. I mean, it's Fusion. Why not run something that doesn't even take room in your card numbers?

[/quote']

Ah, but why do it? You waste money =O

 

ITT: Epic debating skills.

I'm just proving the idiocy of how simple debating is. All points, now matter what they are, can be valid. I don't care about winning a rep or anything xD

[FallenLight]

slayer_supreme: All points can be valid. All you need is falsehoods/opinions to validate them.

[Guest PikaPerson01]

I'm just proving the idiocy of how simple debating is. All points' date=' now matter what they are, can be valid. I don't care about winning a rep or anything xD

[/quote']

 

I think you're proving some sort of idiocy, but not on debating.

 

For one, your point seems to be: "lol! I'm poor!" would be a good reason to not run a card that basically ravages the whole Machine Aggro concept. So... just by buying a 5 dollar card, you could completely cripple a deck-type with a card that doesn't even take deck space... yet you refuse to? I believe the positives greatly outweigh the negatives.

[Zeppeli Gyro Supreme]

I'm just proving the idiocy of how simple debating is. All points' date=' now matter what they are, can be valid. I don't care about winning a rep or anything xD

[/quote']

 

I think you're proving some sort of idiocy, but not on debating.

 

For one, your point seems to be: "lol! I'm poor!" would be a good reason to not run a card that basically ravages the whole Machine Aggro concept. So... just by buying a 5 dollar card, you could completely cripple a deck-type with a card that doesn't even take deck space... yet you refuse to? I believe the positives greatly outweigh the negatives.

There are a lot of people that think that paying $5 for a card to play a game is a dumb idea.

[Guest PikaPerson01]

I'm just proving the idiocy of how simple debating is. All points' date=' now matter what they are, can be valid. I don't care about winning a rep or anything xD

[/quote']

 

I think you're proving some sort of idiocy, but not on debating.

 

For one, your point seems to be: "lol! I'm poor!" would be a good reason to not run a card that basically ravages the whole Machine Aggro concept. So... just by buying a 5 dollar card, you could completely cripple a deck-type with a card that doesn't even take deck space... yet you refuse to? I believe the positives greatly outweigh the negatives.

There are a lot of people that think that paying $5 for a card to play a game is a dumb idea.

And these "a lot of people" probably don't make it very far in their dueling careers.

[RedSceptile]

I'm just proving the idiocy of how simple debating is. All points' date=' now matter what they are, can be valid. I don't care about winning a rep or anything xD

[/quote']

 

I think you're proving some sort of idiocy, but not on debating.

 

For one, your point seems to be: "lol! I'm poor!" would be a good reason to not run a card that basically ravages the whole Machine Aggro concept. So... just by buying a 5 dollar card, you could completely cripple a deck-type with a card that doesn't even take deck space... yet you refuse to? I believe the positives greatly outweigh the negatives.

There are a lot of people that think that paying $5 for a card to play a game is a dumb idea.

And these "a lot of people" probably don't make it very far in their dueling careers.

 

Say that to people who spend 20+ on Raiza The Storm Monarch, oh wait they win tournaments.

[Zeppeli Gyro Supreme]

I'm just proving the idiocy of how simple debating is. All points' date=' now matter what they are, can be valid. I don't care about winning a rep or anything xD

[/quote']

 

I think you're proving some sort of idiocy, but not on debating.

 

For one, your point seems to be: "lol! I'm poor!" would be a good reason to not run a card that basically ravages the whole Machine Aggro concept. So... just by buying a 5 dollar card, you could completely cripple a deck-type with a card that doesn't even take deck space... yet you refuse to? I believe the positives greatly outweigh the negatives.

There are a lot of people that think that paying $5 for a card to play a game is a dumb idea.

And these "a lot of people" probably don't make it very far in their dueling careers.

Maybe not, but I still proved that there is a reason not to play the card. lol

[JackieChun]

No, you really didn't.

[Jib]

You being cheap ins't exactly the best reason ever.

 

It's like if you'd whine about Raiza being overpowered because you can't afford 3.

 

Yes, feel free to insult my mother.

[Zeppeli Gyro Supreme]

You being cheap ins't exactly the best reason ever.

 

It's like if you'd whine about Raiza being overpowered because you can't afford 3.

 

Yes' date=' feel free to insult my mother.

[/quote']

A reason not to play the card is you can't buy it. And that's a good reason because you can't tell a hobo to play a card just because you think he should. That's my position, and it doesn't need to be changed. xP

 

 

EDIT: Lol. Honestly, this is just the same type of stuff I get from my family. It's not hard to prove a point if you stick to it, and let the other person see your way for that time.

[JackieChun]

That's a horrible comparison. Obviously a hobo wouldn't play the game, he'd be busy buying booze like hobos do.

 

As for your argument, it is horrible. If you're in the game to play competitions, you get three Fortress Dragons, regardless of if it's $5 a card or $50.

[Static]

Id rather keep my cydra's, as they are the only machines in my deck. So I won't run it.

 

I guess its OK for gadgets, but not much else, and it can easily get sak'd.

[Guest PikaPerson01]

Id rather keep my cydra's' date=' as they are the only machines in my deck. So I won't run it.

 

I guess its OK for gadgets, but not much else, and it can easily get sak'd.

[/quote']

 

Did you miss the part where it said you could sac your opponent's monsters?

[Shaco]

You being cheap ins't exactly the best reason ever.

 

It's like if you'd whine about Raiza being overpowered because you can't afford 3.

 

Yes' date=' feel free to insult my mother.

[/quote']

 

I think it's a pretty fair reason.

 

... can I insult your mother?

[RedSceptile]

Id rather keep my cydra's' date=' as they are the only machines in my deck. So I won't run it.

 

I guess its OK for gadgets, but not much else, and it can easily get sak'd.

[/quote']

 

Did you miss the part where it said you could sac your opponent's monsters?

 

So yea, totally putting your opponenet at a disadvantage is not a reason to run this card. I mean god forbid your opponenet has a Cyber Dragon and Trooper on the field, I refuse to summon CFD.

[Flame Dragon]

I want to know what you think if my idea of using DNA Surgery.

[Shaco]

I want to know what you think if my idea of using DNA Surgery.

 

Well you (or them) would still need a Cydra on the field.

 

And the purpose of this card isn't necessarily to make a deck around it, but just to be prepared.

 

The good thing about this card is you don't have to make a deck around it, you just put it in your Fusion Deck and use it if the time ever arises.

[Guest PikaPerson01]

I want to know what you think if my idea of using DNA Surgery.

 

Bad. Continuous trap. Works for and against players. Unless your opponent is a terrible duelist, odds are he'd have 3 Fortress Dragons waiting in his Fusion Deck just as you do.