Jump to content

Future Paradise v. Newfie Kuriboh Shark [LOCK- My Win]


Anti-Apocryphal

Recommended Posts

[spoiler=Rules]

Same as YCM. You know what to do. "A" - "B" format. First to five votes wins. PM me card and OCG.

 

Voters

 

No voting just because of picture. Must provide valid vote. Put the following in your vote, please.

 

[right](r)2011 Future Paradise[/right]

 

[spoiler=Card]

Opponent comes up with idea. I must accept it in order for them to be my opponent.

 

[spoiler=Prize]

Fifty points and one reputation point.

 

[spoiler=A]

21ak8zo.jpg

 

When this card is Tribute summoned you can send 1 monster from your oppenents Graveyard to the top of your deck. Warrior-type monsters cannot attack this card when there are 3 or more Warrior-type on your opponents side of the field. This card gains 100 ATK points for every Beast-type monster on the field.

 

 

[spoiler=B]

2vl8plg.png

 

When this monster is Summoned, you may remove 1 monster from your Graveyard from play. Your opponent takes damage equal to that monster's Level x300. While this monster is on the field, your opponent cannot select any other Beast-Type monster on the field as an attack target. Each time this monster attacks, reduce this card's ATK by 300 and put 1 "Remember" Token on this card (max. 3). At any time, you may remove 1 "Remember" Token from this monster to increase your Life Points by 600.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Begin voting. Voters, remember:

 

~ Don't vote based solely on pictures/attributes

~ Explain your vote.

~ Votes such as the following don't count:

 

yea like falling bagel bites said its more useful so yea

The first card's OCG sucks.

The pictur on A is ugly B GMV sorry D=

 

Try to provide OCG corrections (if possible). Begin voting!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, first off, it's REALLY obvious whose card is whose. I mean, REALLY, REALLY obvious.

 

yea like falling bagel bites said its more useful so yea

The first card's OCG sucks.

The pictur on A is ugly B GMV sorry D=

 

 

Card A:

 

Really situational. The Warrior-Type attack blocker only works against Warriors, obviously, but also only when there are three or more. Which makes this card bad. And it gets a maximum of 1000 ATK gain, but that's really unlikely, and it mills only ONE card when it's TRIBUTE SUMMONED.

 

Card B:

 

Reading the first effect, I thought, "This actually works well in a KURIBOH deck. (PM me if you want me to elaborate that.)" You can get a maximum burn of 3600, and then you can reuse it, as the effect states only when SUMMONED. Definitely OTK material.

 

This is difficult... Really UP'ed, situational card, or OP'ed OTK potential...?

 

Well, it's not ridiculously OP'ed, and it could really only work to its OTK potential in a dedicated deck... Card B GMV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

®2011 Future Paradise. This is unnecessary.

 

This is a terrible, TERRIBLE requirement. Neither of these cards are any good, but I don't see how they can be any good with a requirement like this.

 

A: It can steal an opponent's monster, but it's slow and probably unwanted. Last two effects are just stupid situational crap which doesn't really make an influence.

 

B: may=can. :/

It's a meh burn and a meh boost.

Has LOLcounters.

But at least the Beast protect is okay. I guess.

 

B GMV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...