Demon wolf Posted February 4, 2011 Report Share Posted February 4, 2011 I did make this fourm. All who opposes will meet sudden death I say if SEGA ever went up against Nintendo, (M&S at the olmpic games was a retarted match because Sonic doesn't use is ACUTAL speed) I would say that SEGA would domait every one in Nintendo. Who agrees here???:):):):):):):) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack of All Spades Posted February 5, 2011 Report Share Posted February 5, 2011 *gag* You see, your buddy Sonic's been slacking. Ever since the swap to 3D graphics, the fastest hedgehog was as slow as a slug. Sega and Team Sonic did everything they could; gave him more friends...a rival...longer loading screens...more friends...a hoverboard...and they even turned him into a WEREHOG! FOR CRIPES SAKE, WHO'S IDIOTIC IDEA WAS THAT?!? What's a werehog?! *ARGGH* Anyway, he's been running down the steep slope to his death, and he's running pretty fast. Luckily, Sonic 4 came out before another "Tails is gay 4 Sonic trololool1!!" joke surfaced. The game was satisfying and it served fans what I'm pretty sure they wanted all along; nostalgia. Team Sonic and Sega of America are taking notice, and see that what they had wasn't broken. So it took YEARS for Sega to fix their icon, let alone the slew of other Sega games no one seems to care about. *turns to people reading this* Why didn't you kids buy MadWorld? It was the first Wii-exclusive hardcore game, and it was great! Now it's in the "Discount 70%" bin. WHY?!? *turns back to Demon wolf* Sega seems to rely too heavily on the Sonic series. 3/10 Nintendo, on the other hand, has put their icons into decent games. Sure, they've made a bad game or two ("Mario Party 1-8", "Mario Super Sluggers"), but the characters are NEVER counted out of being in the next awesomeriffic title. Take Mario, for example. Nintendo could put him in a dress and make him wear a tiara, and they would STILL think of a place to go with it. Nintendo, however, has a darker side of just regurgitating its old games and replacing the titles with "Ultra", "Super", or "Mega". They always think of fresh ideas, even if they don't use them sometimes. 9/10 I feel wrong to say Nintendo is better than Sega because Sega's main video game is "Sonic the Hedgehog". Nintendo, however, has [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_Nintendo_characters"]ALL THESE![/url] That's like putting the wimpy kid in a dodgeball fight versus the Patriots, Steelers, and Jaguars. If Sega could stretch themselves for newer characters (NO MORE FOR THE SONIC SERIES!!!) and get themselves a working title, then I guarantee they will be a lot more successful. *rant over* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted February 5, 2011 Report Share Posted February 5, 2011 [quote name='MegaTrafficCone' timestamp='1296867938' post='4988117'] *gag* You see, your buddy Sonic's been slacking. Ever since the swap to 3D graphics, the fastest hedgehog was as slow as a slug. Sega and Team Sonic did everything they could; gave him more friends...a rival...longer loading screens...more friends...a hoverboard...and they even turned him into a WEREHOG! FOR CRIPES SAKE, WHO'S IDIOTIC IDEA WAS THAT?!? What's a werehog?! *ARGGH* Anyway, he's been running down the steep slope to his death, and he's running pretty fast. Luckily, Sonic 4 came out before another "Tails is gay 4 Sonic trololool1!!" joke surfaced. The game was satisfying and it served fans what I'm pretty sure they wanted all along; nostalgia. Team Sonic and Sega of America are taking notice, and see that what they had wasn't broken. So it took YEARS for Sega to fix their icon, let alone the slew of other Sega games no one seems to care about. *turns to people reading this* Why didn't you kids buy MadWorld? It was the first Wii-exclusive hardcore game, and it was great! Now it's in the "Discount 70%" bin. WHY?!? *turns back to Demon wolf* Sega seems to rely too heavily on the Sonic series. 3/10 Nintendo, on the other hand, has put their icons into decent games. Sure, they've made a bad game or two ("Mario Party 1-8", "Mario Super Sluggers"), but the characters are NEVER counted out of being in the next awesomeriffic title. Take Mario, for example. Nintendo could put him in a dress and make him wear a tiara, and they would STILL think of a place to go with it. Nintendo, however, has a darker side of just regurgitating its old games and replacing the titles with "Ultra", "Super", or "Mega". They always think of fresh ideas, even if they don't use them sometimes. 9/10 I feel wrong to say Nintendo is better than Sega because Sega's main video game is "Sonic the Hedgehog". Nintendo, however, has [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_Nintendo_characters"]ALL THESE![/url] That's like putting the wimpy kid in a dodgeball fight versus the Patriots, Steelers, and Jaguars. If Sega could stretch themselves for newer characters (NO MORE FOR THE SONIC SERIES!!!) and get themselves a working title, then I guarantee they will be a lot more successful. *rant over* [/quote] While I don't agree with everything said, this has a lot of good point. Sega's recent games, by that I mean Sonic games, have all be lack-luster at best, with several being "make you sick awful" (Sonic Free Riders). Yes, I know Sega has mad some good games and come up with some cool characters [img]http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/gamelife/2009/08/madworld.jpg[/img] their focus is still mostly on Sonic. And yea, the number of big names Sega has isn't close to Nintendo's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WTFauKorean Posted February 5, 2011 Report Share Posted February 5, 2011 lol sonic does not = sega, i used to have a genesis, seriously the altered beast would instant kill all nintendo characters except maybe samus and starfox, the dinasours plus 2 gorillas from the original primal rage rapes all, the main barbarian of golden axe instant death and a lot of the snk characters that worked with sega Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clair Posted February 5, 2011 Report Share Posted February 5, 2011 Oh, hey! A wild WEREHOG appeared! SEGA used one MASTER BALL! All WEREHOG's property belong to SEGA! SEGA's Dignity fell! SEGA's Credibility fell! LOLSEGA. GAME OVER. Even with my dislike for Sega's abuse of Sonic, I must admit that Sonic Colors was a good step forward for the Blue Blur. Hopefully Sega can keep it up to avoid any other wipeouts. Sega also has a lot of other successes. Space Channel 5, Samba de Amigo, Shenmue, and NiGHTS come to mind. Especially NiGHTS. <3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Posted February 5, 2011 Report Share Posted February 5, 2011 I read the title and couldn't even imagine why anyone would say SEGA is greater than Nintendo. Then I read the first post. Yeah. <___< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted February 5, 2011 Report Share Posted February 5, 2011 [quote name='somenoobkorean' timestamp='1296874220' post='4988361'] lol sonic does not = sega, i used to have a genesis, seriously the altered beast would instant kill all nintendo characters except maybe samus and starfox, the dinasours plus 2 gorillas from the original primal rage rapes all, the main barbarian of golden axe instant death and a lot of the snk characters that worked with sega [/quote] While Sega =/= Sonic it's not hard to see why people keep acting like it does. Sonic is Sega's public since you can't go a year without seeing a Sonic game or a game with Sonic. They have other franchises, and make other games, but nothing gets as much focus as Sonic does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saturn of Elemia Posted February 5, 2011 Report Share Posted February 5, 2011 To be perfectly honest, I would be rooting for Sega. I've always been a fan of the Phantasy Star games. Sonic's been with me since the beginning, so I can forgive the later games. (Mario's newer games have been lacking as well). Bayonetta was freaking AWESOME - as was Resonance of Fate and Sakura Taisen. I would LOVE to see a fighting game between Sega and Nintendo characters. I would SO play it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justice Master Posted February 5, 2011 Report Share Posted February 5, 2011 Though, I beleive Nintendo is much better, wheneverI hear a phrase that implies Sonic sucks in 3D I get PO'd. What about the Sonic Adventure games, those were awesome! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ice. Posted February 5, 2011 Report Share Posted February 5, 2011 [quote name='Omega Red' timestamp='1296891283' post='4989141'] To be perfectly honest, I would be rooting for Sega. I've always been a fan of the Phantasy Star games. Sonic's been with me since the beginning, so I can forgive the later games. [b](Mario's newer games have been lacking as well)[/b]. Bayonetta was freaking AWESOME - as was Resonance of Fate and Sakura Taisen. I would LOVE to see a fighting game between Sega and Nintendo characters. I would SO play it. [/quote] ... Wait, New Super Mario Bros. Wii and Super Mario Galaxy 2 were LACKING?! Wow, I must have low standards then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catterjune Posted February 5, 2011 Report Share Posted February 5, 2011 [quote name='somenoobkorean' timestamp='1296874220' post='4988361'] lol sonic does not = sega, i used to have a genesis, seriously the altered beast would instant kill all nintendo characters except maybe samus and starfox, the dinasours plus 2 gorillas from the original primal rage rapes all, the main barbarian of golden axe instant death and a lot of the snk characters that worked with sega [/quote] Primal Rage was made by Atari, not Sega. See, just because a game was on a Sega console doesn't mean it's owned by Sega. Kind of how Snake was in Metal Gear Solid: The Twin Snakes, in Super Smash Bros, and has an upcoming game on the 3DS yet is owned by third party company, Konami. (And why there are plenty of PS2 and PS3 and PSP Metal Gear Solid games) Also, Primal Rage was on the Playstation, Atari Jaguar, Super Nintendo, Gameboy, PC, etc etc. I don't really need to explain why SNK characters are owned by SNK, not Sega, right? As for the original argument of Sega versus Nintendo... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Sega_video_game_franchises A few of them sound familiar, but for the most part being something I "heard of" doesn't sound all that amazing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dries965 Posted February 5, 2011 Report Share Posted February 5, 2011 Even if sega wins, nintendo still wins, as it's franchise is owned by nintendo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Crouton Posted February 5, 2011 Report Share Posted February 5, 2011 [IMG]http://i898.photobucket.com/albums/ac187/Deraj_2010/Megadrive.jpg[/IMG] Sega needs more Shinobi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demon wolf Posted February 5, 2011 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2011 Wait??? Snake is own by Konami?? Don't they make the Yugioh cards???. Anyway, I belive that Sonic had a REAL fight with Mario (MK style stuff like that) Sonic will will win. Heck, throw in Knuckles vs Mario and sure thing Knuckles will win. Mario games these days in my opion are a little.... boring. The only good games were Super Mario 64. And stuff like that (Super Mario Sunshine). Sonic games are the way I like them. Fast-paced, Some amazing fights. And to top it off, Sonic goes Super Sonic and just pwns anything in sight. (sigh) My point is, Sonic owns Mario any day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fire dud Posted February 5, 2011 Report Share Posted February 5, 2011 [quote name='Demon wolf' timestamp='1296862016' post='4987875'] My last topic ended in a lock because of it being to much off topic so I decided to make it a little more ground base to comparson. (Don't ask how this makes sense) I say if SEGA ever went up against Nintendo, (M&S at the olmpic games was a retarted match because Sonic doesn't use is ACUTAL speed) I would say that SEGA would domait every one in Nintendo. Who agrees here???:):):):):):):):) [/quote] I DO SEGA KICKS ALL TIME BUTT, AND SO DOES SONIC IF MARIO EVAN THOUGHT TO VS SONIC HE WOULD GET HIS BUTT WHOOPED LIKE THIS IS MY SCENE THAT I IMAGEN Mario runs up to sonic in his, STUPID UGLY fire suit sonic sees him jumps over his head then does an Ariel Ace to his head Mario then shrinks to no suit at all, then mario gets super pissed Sonic laughs and then speed dashes in him Mario dodges sonic comes back, but this time when mario jumps, sonic does tooo, soo he gets mario right in The gentalmens region but mario laughed and said, I am actulie a girl!!!!! sonic is like, ROFL I ALRADY KNEW peach walkes up, and slaps mario mario then crys like the BIG PU**Y he REALLY IS and that is what I Think would happen =D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WTFauKorean Posted February 5, 2011 Report Share Posted February 5, 2011 [quote name='PikaPerson01' timestamp='1296939065' post='4990619'] Primal Rage was made by Atari, not Sega. See, just because a game was on a Sega console doesn't mean it's owned by Sega. Kind of how Snake was in Metal Gear Solid: The Twin Snakes, in Super Smash Bros, and has an upcoming game on the 3DS yet is owned by third party company, Konami. (And why there are plenty of PS2 and PS3 and PSP Metal Gear Solid games) Also, Primal Rage was on the Playstation, Atari Jaguar, Super Nintendo, Gameboy, PC, etc etc. I don't really need to explain why SNK characters are owned by SNK, not Sega, right? As for the original argument of Sega versus Nintendo... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Sega_video_game_franchises A few of them sound familiar, but for the most part being something I "heard of" doesn't sound all that amazing. [/quote] lol i guess thats true but i wanted to give more crediability becasue its not a fair match, of course nintendo outnumbers by alot, espcially because nintendo has characters with fighting abilities unlike sega which has things like road rash and the wild gun man but its just normal charaters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fire dud Posted February 6, 2011 Report Share Posted February 6, 2011 [quote name='PikaPerson01' timestamp='1296939065' post='4990619'] Primal Rage was made by Atari, not Sega. See, just because a game was on a Sega console doesn't mean it's owned by Sega. Kind of how Snake was in Metal Gear Solid: The Twin Snakes, in Super Smash Bros, and has an upcoming game on the 3DS yet is owned by third party company, Konami. (And why there are plenty of PS2 and PS3 and PSP Metal Gear Solid games) Also, Primal Rage was on the Playstation, Atari Jaguar, Super Nintendo, Gameboy, PC, etc etc. I don't really need to explain why SNK characters are owned by SNK, not Sega, right? As for the original argument of Sega versus Nintendo... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Sega_video_game_franchises A few of them sound familiar, but for the most part being something I "heard of" doesn't sound all that amazing. [/quote] Wikipedia is not always 100% acurit ya know, just sayin' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legokun Posted February 6, 2011 Report Share Posted February 6, 2011 Could you please step out of your little world were SEGA is the only game maker in the universe and Sonic = God, it's very annoying. As for the SEGA Vs. Nintendo debate, I only have 1 thing to say: [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/ee/Deluxe_package.jpg[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justice Master Posted February 6, 2011 Report Share Posted February 6, 2011 [quote name='fire dud' timestamp='1296949301' post='4991017'] I DO SEGA KICKS ALL TIME BUTT, AND SO DOES SONIC IF MARIO EVAN THOUGHT TO VS SONIC HE WOULD GET HIS BUTT WHOOPED LIKE THIS IS MY SCENE THAT I IMAGEN Mario runs up to sonic in his, STUPID UGLY fire suit sonic sees him jumps over his head then does an Ariel Ace to his head Mario then shrinks to no suit at all, then mario gets super pissed Sonic laughs and then speed dashes in him Mario dodges sonic comes back, but this time when mario jumps, sonic does tooo, soo he gets mario right in The gentalmens region but mario laughed and said, I am actulie a girl!!!!! sonic is like, ROFL I ALRADY KNEW peach walkes up, and slaps mario mario then crys like the BIG PU**Y he REALLY IS and that is what I Think would happen =D [/quote] I'm sorry, friend, but the fight would go like this. Sonic speeds torwads Mario at full speed. Mario jumps landing behind Sonich and shoots a fireball. Sonic dodges and attempts to punch Mario. Mario dodges grabs Sonic by the feet and throws him to the ground before throwing a fireball at him. Sonic is hurt, but gets back up and starts to hit Mario with all his might. Mario, before getting the knockout hit, dodges the final attack before rapid fireballs. Mario wins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Posted February 6, 2011 Report Share Posted February 6, 2011 [quote name='fire dud' timestamp='1296952290' post='4991128'] Wikipedia is not always 100% acurit ya know, just sayin' [/quote] You're funny. I've seen at least two or three people saying that the newer Mario games are not as good. Stop living in the past. The Nintendo 64 was my favorite console, and it will always be my favorite console, but even I'll admit that Galaxy 2 and NSMBWii are infinitely better than Super Mario 64. Super Mario 64 was excellent- for its time. But I had a lot more fun playing newer games. Mario is doing perfectly fine right now, with his Mario Sports Mix that is apparently amazing, and his 3DS games. Sonic, however, has had, what, one good game in the recent past? Sonic Colors. Sonic was only a good franchise when it was first created, and has went downhill since. SEGA is fading out quickly in the modern video game market, whereas I wouldn't find a single person in my school who doesn't know what Nintendo is. In terms of a Brawl match, however, Sonic would win. Unless I was playing as Sonic, since I SD so damn often as him. I cannot handle his swiftness, since the fastest character I'm used to playing with doesn't travel at apparently mach speed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacoby746 Posted February 6, 2011 Report Share Posted February 6, 2011 Nintendo I honestly can't think of any major games that were made by Sega in the past year besides Sonic Colors. I'm not saying there haven't been any, I just can't think of any, Like most of the Sega games people have mentioned here- never heard of them. Nintendo on the other hand, has multiple major franchises that are still good games like Mario, Pokemon, Metriod, and Zelda. AS far as I can tell, Sonic is the only Sega character to consistantly have games come out (good or otherwise). And possibly due to my lack of experiance with systems before the N64, I don't know any other big Sega icons. so IMO Nintendo > Sega. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fire dud Posted February 6, 2011 Report Share Posted February 6, 2011 [quote name='Dark' timestamp='1296965735' post='4991733'] You're funny. I've seen at least two or three people saying that the newer Mario games are not as good. Stop living in the past. The Nintendo 64 was my favorite console, and it will always be my favorite console, but even I'll admit that Galaxy 2 and NSMBWii are infinitely better than Super Mario 64. Super Mario 64 was excellent- for its time. But I had a lot more fun playing newer games. Mario is doing perfectly fine right now, with his Mario Sports Mix that is apparently amazing, and his 3DS games. Sonic, however, has had, what, one good game in the recent past? Sonic Colors. Sonic was only a good franchise when it was first created, and has went downhill since. SEGA is fading out quickly in the modern video game market, whereas I wouldn't find a single person in my school who doesn't know what Nintendo is. In terms of a Brawl match, however, Sonic would win. Unless I was playing as Sonic, since I SD so damn often as him. I cannot handle his swiftness, since the fastest character I'm used to playing with doesn't travel at apparently mach speed. [/quote] I tottaly agreee, even tho I LOVE SONIC AND SEGA, the N64 kicks butt[b] ALLL TIME BUTT[/b] it had some of the BEST games EVA, like zelda ocarina of time, and majora's mask, DK 64, CONKER BAD FUR DAY(ROFL THAT GAME IS SOOOOO AWESOME) AND YEA SONIC OWNES ON BRAWL WHEN MY BROS FRIENDS COME OVA AND FACE ME, AS THEY SEE ME PICK SONIC THEY LAFGH, THEN I WHOOP THEM, THEN THEY WANT A REMATCH ROFL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demon wolf Posted February 6, 2011 Author Report Share Posted February 6, 2011 what about f-zero GX? it's made by SEGA and Nintendo. Nintendo made the charaters will SEGA made everything else. and I agree with fire dud, SONIC WILL PUNISH MARIO WITH HIS SPEED AND AGILTY!!! quick question for everyone, Whats Marios final smash on brawl on comparsion to Sonic's final smash?? (THINKING)............... Mario=fail, Soinc=Cheap. I don't think there's much to that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justice Master Posted February 6, 2011 Report Share Posted February 6, 2011 Mario's final smash is a useful way to get rid of a couple of opponents. Sonic's is why smash balls were banned in tornaments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted February 6, 2011 Report Share Posted February 6, 2011 [quote name='fire dud' timestamp='1296996987' post='4992543'] AND YEA SONIC OWNES ON BRAWL [/quote] Um.....Sonic's abilities to "own" relate to the skill of the people around you. Over all, he's not good being far down on the tier list. [quote name='Justice Master' timestamp='1297017819' post='4993208'] Sonic's is why smash balls were banned in tornaments. [/quote] Um.....or it could be that smash balls are just broken items that almost always give the user a free kill when used. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.