Squidward Tentacles Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 Darth Vader has more mastery of the Force, but Maul has a double bladed lightsaber. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clair Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 Grievous has four lightsabers, so he's better than both of them. ;D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MortalKombatSmoke Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 Darth Maul is cool!!!! But Darth Vader is Epic!!! It's a tough decision... but Darth vader ... no maul... crap... I'll just click on a random button. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smesh Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 Sidious looks like the pope. Your argument is invalid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chedbonlahor Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 It would have to be Vader, Substance over style any day of the week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flaring Rose Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 I'd Say... Darth Reven or Malak. Eiether one kicks ass. Darth Vader is kinda old to wear a suit don't you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WTFauKorean Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 darth maul is more of a zealot and darth vader is more of a wizard. if the two duked it out vader would probably win before maul got close. but you know there is star killer from the force unleashed and he's just bull... i mean he took down an entire star destroyer with the force and disinigrated like 30 storm troopers in one go plus he is skilled enough to duel weild light sabers. He lived after getting stabbed and thrown out into space. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flaring Rose Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 Everyone does know that Maul is only an Apprentice? No way near Sith Lord. That why he got killed by a Padawan. Duh. Idiot Sith get no were. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saturn of Elemia Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 Oh, this one is easy - Darth Vader. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flaring Rose Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 Agree with Saturn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kotaro Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 I like Maul but Vader would win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flinsbon Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 I'm gonna have to say Vader by a long shot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloister Posted January 7, 2011 Report Share Posted January 7, 2011 Vader would win in even without his helmet on and blindfolded. Maul is cool though, but not nearly as a great villain as Darth Vader. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ice. Posted January 8, 2011 Report Share Posted January 8, 2011 Grievous. *reads Clair's post* ... shut up i'm original. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squidward Tentacles Posted January 8, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 8, 2011 yeah. darth vader would have to win. much more mastery of the force. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacoby746 Posted January 8, 2011 Report Share Posted January 8, 2011 Well, even though Vader has mastery of the Force, his lightsaber skills would be severly minimized due to his life support suit and robotics. So, I think it would be a close fight. But Maul wouldn't really be able to get close enough to do any damage if Vader took advantage of his Force powers, so Im going with Vader. [quote name='Sky Fire' timestamp='1294372064' post='4916962'] Everyone does know that Maul is only an Apprentice? No way near Sith Lord. That why he got killed by a Padawan. Duh. Idiot Sith get no were. [/quote] But he DID kill a Jedi Master. He might've gotten a promotion- ya know, if he survived. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squidward Tentacles Posted January 8, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 8, 2011 [quote name='Jacoby746' timestamp='1294451000' post='4918863'] Well, even though Vader has mastery of the Force, his lightsaber skills would be severly minimized due to his life support suit and robotics. So, I think it would be a close fight. But Maul wouldn't really be able to get close enough to do any damage if Vader took advantage of his Force powers, so Im going with Vader. But he DID kill a Jedi Master. He might've gotten a promotion- ya know, if he survived. [/quote] well, technically he was ressurected. with mechanical legs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted January 8, 2011 Report Share Posted January 8, 2011 Why the hell did you even make this topic? Gary Sue V.S. Plot-Devical Primal Antagonist. Seriously, like, this is stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Death Metal Posted January 8, 2011 Report Share Posted January 8, 2011 Darth Vader would annihilate Maul. This isn't even a fair fight... make Vader fight someone like Revan, Marka Ragnos, or Exar Kun. Then he might have a hard time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ninjarainbowcloud6! Posted January 8, 2011 Report Share Posted January 8, 2011 Darth Vader lol its 14-0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted January 8, 2011 Report Share Posted January 8, 2011 [quote name='ninjarainbowcloud6!' timestamp='1294488693' post='4919784'] Darth Vader lol its 14-0 [/quote] It could go forever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Amazing Avian Posted January 8, 2011 Report Share Posted January 8, 2011 [quote name='Sky Fire' timestamp='1294372064' post='4916962'] Everyone does know that Maul is only an Apprentice? No way near Sith Lord. That why he got killed by a Padawan. Duh. Idiot Sith get no were. [/quote] [i]"Two there should be; no more, no less. One to embody power, the other to crave it."[/i] -Darth Bane You should take into account the rule of two which was established by Darth Bane. Bane made that rule so that there would be much less infighting among the Sith since only a few would have the title of Sith Lord. The Rule of Two made it so that there was never more than two Sith, both lords. The master possesses great power and passes it on to his apprentice who will one day overthrow him then take an apprentice of his own. That being clarified BOTH Vader and Maul are Sith Lords. And even though he killed a master, Maul would not have been promoted because in order to keep the rule going, the apprentice has to defeat his master in a duel. Okay, now on combat skill, from what the moves revealed, Maul was a very good swordsman, he was able to take on two Jedi at once and kill Qui Gon Jinn. He was killed by Obi Wan almost immediately afterward, but he was sort of take by surprise there, and he plain owned Obi Wan for most of the fight so he is actually a very good fighter, his knowledge of the Force was not shown entirely because the fight didn't show him using the Force much, I'll just assume he was pretty much on par with Assajj Ventress in terms of Force capabilities. Now Vader was crippled after the incident on Mustafar, he was rebuilt, but he still lacks the agility he had with his natural body, giving Maul and advantage over him in terms of lightsaber skill, but he has far surpassed even Sidious in terms of his ability with the Force. That being the case, if Maul can get him in a close quarters duel, he would undoubtedly have the advantage, but if Vader can get distance between them, Maul had better be able to breathe through a crushed trachea. I personally think that Maul can beat Vader in a duel, but he would probably need a new hand since the series is well known for disarming people. God, I am such a geek. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flaring Rose Posted January 9, 2011 Report Share Posted January 9, 2011 [quote name='Random Dude' timestamp='1294530316' post='4921264'] [i]"Two there should be; no more, no less. One to embody power, the other to crave it."[/i] -Darth Bane You should take into account the rule of two which was established by Darth Bane. Bane made that rule so that there would be much less infighting among the Sith since only a few would have the title of Sith Lord. The Rule of Two made it so that there was never more than two Sith, both lords. The master possesses great power and passes it on to his apprentice who will one day overthrow him then take an apprentice of his own. That being clarified BOTH Vader and Maul are Sith Lords. And even though he killed a master, Maul would not have been promoted because in order to keep the rule going, the apprentice has to defeat his master in a duel. Okay, now on combat skill, from what the moves revealed, Maul was a very good swordsman, he was able to take on two Jedi at once and kill Qui Gon Jinn. He was killed by Obi Wan almost immediately afterward, but he was sort of take by surprise there, and he plain owned Obi Wan for most of the fight so he is actually a very good fighter, his knowledge of the Force was not shown entirely because the fight didn't show him using the Force much, I'll just assume he was pretty much on par with Assajj Ventress in terms of Force capabilities. Now Vader was crippled after the incident on Mustafar, he was rebuilt, but he still lacks the agility he had with his natural body, giving Maul and advantage over him in terms of lightsaber skill, but he has far surpassed even Sidious in terms of his ability with the Force. That being the case, if Maul can get him in a close quarters duel, he would undoubtedly have the advantage, but if Vader can get distance between them, Maul had better be able to breathe through a crushed trachea. I personally think that Maul can beat Vader in a duel, but he would probably need a new hand since the series is well known for disarming people. God, I am such a geek. [/quote] I know of the rule of two. Which is stupid. Rule of One is better. Now. Every sith can take on 2 jedi's at once. Even more. Due to that they are stronger thant he Jedi. And Always will be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brinolovania Posted January 10, 2011 Report Share Posted January 10, 2011 Vader...OK, who voted for Maul? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Amazing Avian Posted January 10, 2011 Report Share Posted January 10, 2011 Am I the only one who voted for Maul? BTW, don't bring in any "Vader is a master and Maul is an apprentice" bullcrap. Both Vader and Maul are apprentices since Vader never overthrew Sidious. And when he did, he died about an hour later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.