LOCK.

[Daigusto Sphreez]

My second 1 v 1

 

I chose the requirements to my first, so my opponent can choose the requirement this time.

Requirement

Create a monster card that cannot attack.

 

Level 3+ members only please.

 

Prize

1 Rep from the Loser

 

Victory Conditions

First to 5 Votes or 7 days after the cards were posted.

 

Other Information

-In a Card A - Card B format, so leave all forms of identification off of the card please, leave the circulation, Set ID and Creator slot blank. Also make sure to PM me the card after I've approved you, don't post it here.

 

-Use the YCM default card Template, for easier/fairer comparison.

 

-Voters receive +1 Rep, provided they give GOOD reasons as to why they chose the card they did. Votes will be ignored if I decide that they aren't explained sufficiently.

 

-Judge on all aspects, Name, Picture, Effect, Balance, Playability, OCG, Creativity and anything else you judge by - also consider if the card meets the requirement.

 

-If more than 1 person challenges me, I reserve my right to choose who I compete against. There are a few select requirements I might reject.

 

 

So, thats my bit done, if your interested post here, then you can PM me the card only after I've approved your request on this thread.

 

FINI.

 

 

If you want to challenge me, just say so, right here, right now. :)

 

 

OK

 

The Cards

 

[spoiler=Card A]

 

 

Lore:

This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Special Summoned by discarding 2 Equip Spell Cards. This card cannot declare an attack. Once per turn, if you control this monster on the field, you can equip it to a face-up Warrior-Type monster on your side of the field as an Equip Card, OR unequip it to Special Summon it in face-up Attack Position. When equipped to a monster by this card's effect, that monster's ATK and DEF are the same as this card's ATK and DEF (1 monster can only be equipped with 1 Union Monster at a time). If the equipped monster would be destroyed, you can remove from play 1 Equip Spell Card in your Graveyard instead. If not, destroy this card. When this card is destroyed, you can add 1 Equip Spell Card from your Graveyard to your hand, then destroy all face-up Equip Spell Cards your opponent controls.

 

 

 

 

[spoiler=Card B]

 

 

Lore:

This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card cannot be Special Summoned except by Tributing 1 monster you control. The original ATK of this card is 2400. This card cannot declare an attack. Once per turn, you can destroy 1 monster your opponent controls, and inflict damage to your opponent equal to the Level of the destroyed monster x 100. If your opponent controls no monsters, you can inflict 2400 damage to your opponent. You cannot activate this effect during the turn this card was Summoned.

 

 

 

 

 

Voting Has Begun!

First to 5 Votes.

Give at Least 3 reasons for your vote for it to be counted.

If you give 3 DETAILED reasons (or some other form of good assessment), you will receive 1 Rep.

THANK YOU!

[Sweetie Belle]

I call it! A monster that can't attack.

[Daigusto Sphreez]

I'll have to get my creative juices flowing, especially given that its you...

but your on!

 

[Heavens Guardian]

dang Radiokirby your fast i was about to join but o well. I have my own contest.

[Daigusto Sphreez]

The cards are now up ^

 

You can start voting now!

Thanks.

 

 

 

[HoneycombTroy]

I know which one is which. I'm not telling though. Can i Pm whos card i think is whos.

Vote for card a.

Reason1:It was creative how the creator added the part in the effect how you could destroy an equip spell card from your graveyard. Most Union monsters just destroy themselves instead of the equip spell cards. And you still added that is destroys itself.

Reason2: It was great how instead of the monster gaining 2700, (which is alot when adding to Atk) its ATK becomes 2700.

Reason3: It has great OCG, a reaonable attack for its level and a pic that relates to its name.

[Daigusto Sphreez]

That is a valid vote.

You can PM me/kirby with your guess if you wish. :)

1-0

 

 

 

[.:Blu:.]

Card A b****es.... Why? I like the creative effective and seems very useful in situations. Card B is good too but a little bit Op's considering you can dish out 2400 points of damage if your opponent doesn't control any monsters. In terms of OCG and stuff, both cards are great.

[Daigusto Sphreez]

Thanks for the vote.

2-0

 

[Zextra]

Card A gets my vote, because it is a creative, original, and balanced way to support Warrior/Equip decks. Also, it's a Union, which accounts for some creativity points, since they're rare nowadays. Card B is OP'ed. Though it can't attack, its effect more than makes up for it. In fact, its effect technically allows it to "attack" without actually attacking. Also, in addition, it doesn't have a limit as of how strong of a monster it can destroy. Plus, once your opponent has no monsters, it deals damage equal to its ATK, 2400, which is better than attacking directly, as it is less vulnerable. Also, what was the point of putting ? ATK when its text shows that it has an original ATK of 2400?

 

Anyways, for the above reasons, Card A gets my vote.

[Daigusto Sphreez]

Thanks for the vote, that's definitely valid.

3-0

 

[Heavens Guardian]

Card A

 

1. Its harder to summon and it is equip with effect so a union

 

2. Card b is over powered if no monsters on field deal 2400 damage so u have 5 monsters on the field kill theres then use efffect

3.Its more realistic(just barley)

4.(in cause the other one didn't work)

It can be killed easyly but thats good because its powerful.

[Smesh]

They're both very meh cards. But Card A is more playable. Card B's burn is just a little too much.

[Daigusto Sphreez]

Thanks for the votes, but:

 

@Maple

I'd say that was two reasons, in effect your saying:

1) Card A is balanced & more realistic

2) Card B is overpowered

 

If you can give another, I will count it.

 

@Smesh

 

Same really, if you can give further reasons, I would count it.

 

 

 

[Smesh]

I f***ing hate when people ask for a better reason on a fair vote.

 

Card A would work good with Union Decks. Card B has a burn that is way too high, which is OP'd. You can also destroy a monster very easily with no cost.

 

Card A gmv.

 

That good? <_<

[Daigusto Sphreez]

I'll give you that, Thanks. I do it to make sure neither person feels robbed out of a vote.

At least I give the incentive of rep if you explain well..

 

4-0

 

[Daigusto Sphreez]

Bumpage.

 

[seattleite]

I will have to go with card A. It has a creative effect (and so does card B ), but it also follows the Warrior "theme" relating to Equip Spells. Plus, i think it's more balanced, since card B has too much splashability and a really powerful priority effect. Card A does feel a little more "clunky" than card B because of some unnecessary effects (destroy all equip spell cards your opponent controls? Random.). But the rest of it follows a good theme and makes for an "engine". It was close though, and there are many good things I can say about card B as well :)

[Sweetie Belle]

Well, from my point of view, that looks like game. 5-0, Thermatic wins.

[Daigusto Sphreez]

Thanks for the vote / glad to have got this finished!

5-0

 

I was Card A

Kirby was Card B

 

Although his iconic Escaped Project cards kind of gave the game away to some people.

Either way, thanks for the duel Kirby, you are certainly more consistently amazing at card making than me, I just made the special effort here. I believe I'm owed 1 Rep.. :D

Thanks to all voters!

I enjoyed this one. ^_^