LOCK

[Squirrel Girl]

All ycm rules apply

All you have to do is an EI support of some sort

First to 3 votes get a rep from the loser or until 15th November

Voters must have a good reason why they vote or the vote doesn't count

First to post card will be my opponent

 

My card:

 

As long as this card remains face-up on the field, "Earthbound Immortal" monsters cannot be destroyed by their own effects. This card can attack your opponent directly. When this card attacks your opponent directly, it is changed to Defense Position at the end of the damage step. This card cannot be destroyed by card effects while in face-up Defense Position.

 

My opponent's card:

 

 

If there is not a Field Spell on the field when this card was summoned, search your deck and set one Field spell on the Field. That card cannot be destroyed while this monster is on the field. If there is another "Earthbound Immortal" on the field, this card is the only monster that can be selecetd as an attack target.

[Guest dtwrules]

reserved... making card now

sorry i miss read something im joining!!

[Squirrel Girl]

If someone post before you, he will be my opponent, just so you know

[Guest dtwrules]

Lore: If there is not a Field Spell on the field when this card was summoned, search your deck and set one Field spell on the Field. That card cannot be destroyed while this monster is on the field. If there is another "Earthbound Immortal" on the field, this card is the only monster that can be selecetd as an attack target.

[Squirrel Girl]

Start vote

[~Hado~]

I vote for Axman.

Dtw's card is a bit OP, is missing some traits all Earthbounds have, and the OCG is meh.

That's all the reason I have.

[Guest dtwrules]

ty for vote! 1-0 axman

[Mugendramon]

None of the cards actually have any of the traits Earthbound Immortals should have. Except the Attacking directly thing, used by Axman. That is the one and only reason for me voting his card over yours, dtw.

 

But neither of you thought about an original name. Shame on you.

[Guest dtwrules]

*whines like a dog*

[Squirrel Girl]

Well, 2 - 0 for me

 

What language is EI's name on?

[Ieyasu Tokugawa]

Gah! This is a hard choice! Main problem is that since these are technically "Earthbound Immortals", that means you cannot control another one, thus nulling out any idea of the support they would have brought.

 

I'm voting for the hound though, brings out a field spell and protects it, while protector prevents EI's from self destruction, broken because you don't need a field anymore.

[Squirrel Girl]

2 - 1 for me

 

More votes

[Mugendramon]

What language is EI's name on?

 

The language of whoever made the Nazca Lines. I think it was Inca or something.

[Guest dtwrules]

i believe it is inca... i think ill search up the word hound in incan...

[Squirrel Girl]

I search up the word Protector in inca

[Guest dtwrules]

i cant find a translator

[Squirrel Girl]

You can ask 1 member here if they know

[moppmoppmopp]

Borh cards has something to do with Field Spells. I don't like that. But I also dislike high-level monsters with low DEF. Vote for AxManBoy. No offense, dtwrules. But I don't like your card.

[Guest dtwrules]

its ok... and they have to do with field cards because an EI deck is hard to keep field spells on the field

[Squirrel Girl]

I have make a Set where you can use EI pretty good, cause the Field Spell cannot be destroyed and another Field Spell cannot be activated, but I won. So you have to pay the prize and pay me the rep

[Guest dtwrules]

rep given. good game!

[Squirrel Girl]

Let's have a rematch sometimes