Smesh Posted October 27, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 27, 2010 I say if they're 3 or more months inactive, get rid of them. They obviously don't care. Then replace them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CinnamonStar Posted October 27, 2010 Report Share Posted October 27, 2010 ^That's the thing really. There was a policy started by YCMaker himself about inactive mods but somehow it got lost and no one seems to care anyway. Hunter for example made a leaving post but came back a few months later (as Huntar!) and it's hard to know what he wants to do or not. glasstin10...no idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted October 27, 2010 Report Share Posted October 27, 2010 @Black - YES C&O definitely needs a large amount. I'd say FD, + another 2, MINIMUM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smesh Posted October 27, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 27, 2010 If Huntar said he was going to leave, remove and replace him. If he comes back, he comes back as a former. Remove Glasstin and replace him. He just randomly left? Even Yankee. He said he would resign. Remove and replace. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Posted October 27, 2010 Report Share Posted October 27, 2010 Let's talk about the idolization of popular YCM members and how it rev- *shot* [quote name='JoshIcy' timestamp='1288137913' post='4740422'] I don't know about you, but I love the Warn System. It effectively tallies how many rules that person has broken, and how severe we can get. And my patience hasn't worn out yet, but then again my patience lasts years. And yea this section could use one a lot of them, but as far as urgency goes? lol... Meh, maybe it's how I prioritize the sections. [/quote] Not at all. You cannot remove warns, as you said yourself, from the warning system. Effectively, any warn you get on ipb is a [b]perma[/b]-warn, and that is just utter bullshit. [quote name='Tainted Black' timestamp='1288138183' post='4740444'] I liked RP @ 3, but 2 will work, possibly. Clubs... dear God... 3-4, IMO. [/quote] Clubs needs one or two mods but strict-as-hell rules. [quote name='Opalmoon' timestamp='1288139638' post='4740559'] ^That's the thing really. There was a policy started by YCMaker himself about inactive mods but somehow it got lost and no one seems to care anyway. Hunter for example made a leaving post but came back a few months later (as Huntar!) and it's hard to know what he wants to do or not. glasstin10...no idea. [/quote] If you come back after you have supposedly left, why would you still be considered a mod? [quote name='Dark Link 401' timestamp='1288139705' post='4740565'] @Black - YES C&O definitely needs a large amount. I'd say FD, + another 2, MINIMUM [/quote] damnit man i wanna be the c&o mod bust all u up for spamming n shiz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted October 27, 2010 Report Share Posted October 27, 2010 Strict rules....I think what Clubs really needs is enough people to be able to check clubs more often. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Posted October 27, 2010 Report Share Posted October 27, 2010 Well obviously with the new, stricter rules comes a way to enforce those rules. <___< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow Zero Posted October 27, 2010 Report Share Posted October 27, 2010 Nre and stricter rules? *was booted off the comp for a while and is very behind* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smesh Posted October 27, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 27, 2010 @Shadow For clubs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow Zero Posted October 27, 2010 Report Share Posted October 27, 2010 orlyowl.jpg Do tell. What might these new and stricter rules be? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted October 27, 2010 Report Share Posted October 27, 2010 I'm sure the rules as they are are fine. But it's just FD doesn't have the manpower to check every club to make sure they're being followed. Of course, a + in rules is fine, if you also boost the manpower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted October 27, 2010 Report Share Posted October 27, 2010 I just had the worse best idea ever. Just lock every club. It would piss off a lot of people but it is the cleanest way of fixing everything. Yea it's a bad way to go about it, but it would let everything start clean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twig Posted October 27, 2010 Report Share Posted October 27, 2010 [quote name='Flame Dragon' timestamp='1288141814' post='4740744'] I just had the worse best idea ever. Just lock every club. It would piss off a lot of people but it is the cleanest way of fixing everything. Yea it's a bad way to go about it, but it would let everything start clean. [/quote] I lol'd. The only people who will get pissed are those who care about their club post count. Owait, that's everyone. But it's a foolproof plan. xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted October 27, 2010 Report Share Posted October 27, 2010 ... But, I'm proud of my club and the Absolute Powerforce. [s]All others can be locked.[/s] JK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow Zero Posted October 27, 2010 Report Share Posted October 27, 2010 I think a lot of people would be upset because a lot of us like the clubs we go to and feel at home in them to a certain extent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twig Posted October 27, 2010 Report Share Posted October 27, 2010 You guys are acting like the clubs will change in some way. 1. Make new thread. 2. Copynpasta. 3. Post. 4. ???? =Profit! The only thing it will do is reset the post count. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smesh Posted October 27, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 27, 2010 FD should do it for the lulz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clair Posted October 27, 2010 Report Share Posted October 27, 2010 If Clubs and Organizations rules were to be more strict, I can think of a fair number of clubs that would immediately be given warns. xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smesh Posted October 27, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 27, 2010 Lolpowerforce Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow Zero Posted October 27, 2010 Report Share Posted October 27, 2010 What are these new stricter rules anyway? I have yet to hear what they are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FTW (For The Wynn) Posted October 27, 2010 Report Share Posted October 27, 2010 [quote name='Flame Dragon' timestamp='1288141814' post='4740744'] I just had the worse best idea ever. Just lock every club. It would piss off a lot of people but it is the cleanest way of fixing everything. Yea it's a bad way to go about it, but it would let everything start clean. [/quote] lol, it would work. You're right, worst best idea ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted October 27, 2010 Report Share Posted October 27, 2010 [quote name='FTW (For The Wynn)' timestamp='1288144741' post='4740937'] lol, it would work. You're right, worst best idea ever. [/quote] I think best worst is better than worst best. Worst Best means it was the best they could come up with, and it fails. Best Worst means it is not a good idea, but it is almost one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anbu-of-Sand Posted October 27, 2010 Report Share Posted October 27, 2010 So....still talking about the Mod Problem I see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Templar Knox Posted October 27, 2010 Report Share Posted October 27, 2010 YCMthropology helping make this site better one problem at a time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FTW (For The Wynn) Posted October 27, 2010 Report Share Posted October 27, 2010 [quote name='Tainted Black' timestamp='1288144925' post='4740944'] I think best worst is better than worst best. Worst Best means it was the best they could come up with, and it fails. Best Worst means it is not a good idea, but it is almost one. [/quote] True, I suppose you are right. [quote name='Anbu-of-Sand' timestamp='1288145259' post='4740958'] So....still talking about the Mod Problem I see. [/quote] Pretty much. Although, it seems to be pretty well taken care of. Should we start a new topic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.