Defending the Indefencable

[Bahamut - Envoy of the End]

Radio 5 listeners may recognise this game as the final round of Saturday mornings 'Fighting Talk'.

This game is extremely simple. I will come up with some nonsensical, incomprehendible concept, and the next poster has to agree with whatever I've put, defend it and give good reason why what I've said is justified. Then they leave a challenge for the next person. Simple eh?

''Example: Person 1 - Charles Bronson should be the face of Comic Relief.

Person 2 - Of course Bronson should be the face of Comic Relief. Can you imagine how comical he would look doing all manner of things for charity? And let's face it, if Charles Bronson tells you to donate money, you WILL donate money.''

Next Concept... and so on...

Try to come up with the craziest, most undefendable concepts you can, but please keep it classy - nothing libelous, flametory, distasteful, etc.

Have fun.

[s][b]So to begin[/b]: Bruce Forsyth should be the next Prime Minister.[/s]

[Bahamut - Envoy of the End]

Bad start (just like all my threads really). Ok I think I identified the flaw here. I forget that YCM is a global website and people may not know who I'm talking about. If I'm going to pick on someone, it will have to be an international name.

Let's start again then. Defend the following statement:

[b]Paris Hilton would be a great addition to MENSA[/b]

For the record; Bronson is Britian's most dangerous man, and Forsyth is a television entertainer.