Third Sig EVER.(Improvement?)

[ŽęñŧıŚ]

[color="#00BFFF"][center][u][b]I'd say it's an improvement

Before:
[IMG]http://i56.tinypic.com/21o7ou9.png[/IMG]

Then:
[IMG]http://i53.tinypic.com/2801i80.png[/IMG]

After:
[IMG]http://i51.tinypic.com/n1cfwp.png[/IMG][/b][/u][/center][/color]

[center][color="#00BFFF"][u][b]LOCK double post by accident[/b][/u][/color][/center]

[Seta]

If you want to make a sig, I'd suggest to atleast start with the right dimensions...

[Raiza]

Lacks the basics.

Read some tuts.

[Cin]

^Very helpful. Next time I see an unhelp post like that from you, you will recieve a 20% warning.

Seta is right, there too large in dimension to be considered signatures, you need to get them down to below 150 height and 400/450 width, (opposite for verticals) for them to be classed as signatures.

[.GhostRyder]

[b][size="2"]IMO I would say you are missuing the Render and Effects. I suggest you get some flow into the images and lower the Opacitiy of the render to fit the BG and Effects. Oh and like Seta said, use right Dimentions. 400/150 is kinda right.[/size][/b]

[Kaisu]

Actually, Tags = 500/500- or what Yin said.

I use 400x120, but.. Yeah.

I'd say to stop spamming those brushes or whatever.

[Twenty-five Zero Oh-oh]

Perhaps try reading this?
http://alpine.brainkiller.be/Resources/Fullsigtut_techniques.png

[ŽęñŧıŚ]

[color="#00BFFF"][u][b]Thanks everyone for [i]Constructive[/i] Criticism(Raiza, I didn;t get what you meant)

@ Yin: Okay, I'll do that.

@ Kaisu: Spamming brushes? Ok....

@2500st : I didn't understand the tut.....[/b][/u][/color]

[Seta]

[quote name='ŽęñŧıŚ' timestamp='1284111744' post='4613302']
[color="#00BFFF"][u][b]Thanks everyone for [i]Constructive[/i] Criticism(Raiza, I didn;t get what you meant)
[/b][/u][/color]
[/quote]

I'll give you one advice:

If you don't even know what the WORD basics means, I suggest you'd seriously look onto it before even trying to make a tag.