Ｄｈａｒｃ Posted August 10, 2010 Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 Alright, I have here a Tuner who is, to my knowledge, the only card to have his second ability.Please Rate/Comment/Whatever.Image made by HP DOOM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥ ЅϯᵲåώӀӞ℮ᴙʀɣ−ɴɨɨ−ƈħåɴ ♥ Posted August 10, 2010 Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 It's good. That's all I can say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ｄｈａｒｃ Posted August 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 Anything in particular, or just in general? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥ ЅϯᵲåώӀӞ℮ᴙʀɣ−ɴɨɨ−ƈħåɴ ♥ Posted August 10, 2010 Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 Just in general. It's a good card. Nothing needs to be changed about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
⎣oshed~ Posted August 10, 2010 Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 Very cool, like the image. IMO, I think you may want to lower the DEF to 1000 also. Like the effect too and the a good name. Grade: A Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkForce™ Posted August 10, 2010 Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 Grammar sucks. Pic is been used quite frequently, name is bland. 5/10. (Sorry about the next 2 posts. My computer posted it 3 times. Im going to + REP u for understanding.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkForce™ Posted August 10, 2010 Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 Grammar sucks. Pic is been used quite frequently, name is bland. 5/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkForce™ Posted August 10, 2010 Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 Grammar sucks. Pic is been used quite frequently, name is bland. 5/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ｄｈａｒｃ Posted August 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 Okay, thanks you two. I personally think the DEF doesn't matter since it can't be destroyed unless someone uses Shield Crash/Crush or something of the sort. Plus, I decide on ATK and DEF based on what I think fits together best (Such as 1000/1900 or 2600/2100). What's wrong with the Grammar? I didn't see anything wrong with that. And you try to come up with a name for this if you think you're so smart. Plus, when has this picture been used before? I just noticed it on HP DOOM's Archive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
⎣oshed~ Posted August 10, 2010 Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 I think I saw it somewhere before. It was in someone's Machine-Type set, but IDC about overused/frequently images. Also I agree, I see no grammar issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkForce™ Posted August 10, 2010 Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 Ok. The Grammar should be worded: "During either players turn, you can change this cards Battle Position. This card cannot be destroyed while in Defense Position." The name does fit the picture, but it lacks the esscence of something a card would be named. And if you wish, I will PM you links for every card that uses this picture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkForce™ Posted August 10, 2010 Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 Ok. The Grammar should be worded: "During either players turn, you can change this cards Battle Position. This card cannot be destroyed while in Defense Position." The name does fit the picture, but it lacks the esscence of something a card would be named. And if you wish, I will PM you links for every card that uses this picture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ｄｈａｒｃ Posted August 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 Ahem, it's not supposed to change positions during your opponent's turn, it's supposed to change battle position during your turn even if it has already attacked. So there. And now you're saying the name isn't imaginative enough? Allow me to say the following: Parasitic Ticky, Ruin-Queen of Oblivion, Demise-King of Armageddon, Perfectly Ultimate Great Moth, Last Turn, Red-Eyes Black Dragon, Blue-Eyes White Dragon. There. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted August 10, 2010 Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 nice cardhas its uses and its a machine :Dgrammer IMO looks perfectly fine and unique9.234/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ｄｈａｒｃ Posted August 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 Thanks, D.A. Anything need to be improved, you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted August 10, 2010 Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 well only thing bothering me is its DEF maybe lower it to 1500 or lowercause not being destroyed by battle is pretty heavy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ｄｈａｒｃ Posted August 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 But, as I said, if it can't be destroyed by battle anyway, why does DEF matter? I mean, I guess there's piercing, but the only ones that can't get through would be Mad Sword Beast, Spear Dragon, and one Cyberdark (I think Edge, but might be Horn. Besides, that's just if there are no LV 3 or lower Dragons in your Graveyard). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted August 10, 2010 Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 theres other monsters with piercingi know there at least 1 BW that has it or instead of a DEF decrease maybe a life drainmost monsters with indestructible ability's have a big draw backand when i say most i mean all... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yusuf Alaseeri Posted August 10, 2010 Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 It's cool, I like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ｄｈａｒｃ Posted August 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 Hmm...Yeh, does need a drawback...The card itself doesn't seem like a Life-Drainer, but I think I might make it so it can only tune Machines or something...Besides, screw the Blackwings, I have money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted August 10, 2010 Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 heh why screw Black Wings when you can screw the Meta ;) join the Anti-Meta we hae chocolate lolzsure i would like to see the draw back ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ｄｈａｒｃ Posted August 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 Hooray for Anti-Meta! (I'm still grateful for your explanation). Anyhow, it only tunes Machines now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Athena- Posted August 10, 2010 Report Share Posted August 10, 2010 Nice card. I don't see any obvious OCG error.Just change the word may into can.Cool picture and okay name. And I don't know if it is overused because this was the first time I saw it. The only drawback (that I think you should make) is that you should lower the ATK (maybe DEF).You don't have to lower the ATK but I just thought it might make it more balance since it can attack your opponent and then go into DEF position without getting destroyed.Maybe ATK= 500, DEF=1600, and stars=4. Anyways, I like the card. 9/10 for you :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ｄｈａｒｃ Posted August 11, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 11, 2010 Alright, consider it done. Anything else I need to do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King of Yesonia Posted August 11, 2010 Report Share Posted August 11, 2010 I really like the picture. I like the effect too. It's a very good card! 10/10 woohoo! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.