Lord Smeagle Posted August 8, 2010 Report Share Posted August 8, 2010 I think this card speaks for itself. Image Credit: Jazin Kay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted August 8, 2010 Report Share Posted August 8, 2010 That's... odd.I'd probably make sure I got Armory Arm out of it, since you wouldn't want to tribute summon a normal monster. Still, I don't see a lot of use to this, it being a -1, since not that many monsters are game breaking enough to -1 for this, then -1+ for a synchro Summon, which requires setup. I feel this'd be dead a lot, and wouldn't see play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted August 8, 2010 Report Share Posted August 8, 2010 It's treated as Normal. Does it keep effect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Smeagle Posted August 8, 2010 Author Report Share Posted August 8, 2010 Yes, it keeps the effect, but it has to no longer be treated as a Synchro monster so it won't immediately bounce to the Extra Deck. (Maybe needs OCG work.) Also, I figure the ruling would say that it's no longer restricted by "This monster cannot be Special Summoned except by Synchro Summon" because otherwise it'd be pointless. I was thinking it could be used for big synchros like...Majestic Star Dragon? I mean, there's one that might be worth two tributes... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dries965 Posted August 8, 2010 Report Share Posted August 8, 2010 it still needs some work, but i like the idea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuerta6 Posted August 8, 2010 Report Share Posted August 8, 2010 wow thats very creative! the idea itself is revolutionary, can be played around with and can make the game much more interesting, i was thinking of Naturia Extrio and fusion monsters that require syncro monsters as its fusion material monsters9.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.