Jump to content

Pokemon is Satan D:

Tentacruel

By Tentacruel
in General

Recommended Posts

Sploda Newbie

Sploda

Posted
Posted

In FR and LG he is named Green, in Japan! In HG/SS he is named Green, in Japan! I am basing it off modern games!

 

In JAPAN That is the issue here, we aren't in JAPAN. We are in AMERICA! If you need further prove in Europe he is named BLUE as well. How will one nation determine Canon for a much larger nation and an entire Continent! His name is BLUE, your going to have to accept that.

 

Otherwise we will have to settle this with a game of Mahjong!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 126
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Blake Newbie

Blake

Posted
Posted

Dude, this isn't a religion topic, so shut up. Science has not proven God false, and it is actually a big topic. Many scientists happen to believe there is something beyond us that created us, so seriously, stop being an intolerant person.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OmegaWave Newbie

OmegaWave

Posted
Posted

Dude, this isn't a religion topic, so shut up. Science has not proven God false, and it is actually a big topic. Many scientists happen to believe there is something beyond us that created us, so seriously, stop being an intolerant person.

 

First of all, dumbass. I didn't say Science proved God false. I said it proved that "God creating everything" was false. Evolution happened. I believe something else is out there too. Also, it is a religion topic. Satan is a religious figure. So stfu.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Blake Newbie

Blake

Posted
Posted

HA! Shows what you know! More and more scientists are turning AWAY from Evolution! Darwin even did! Scientists believe in a Creator, no matter their version. One guy thinks we are basically a video game created by Humans in the future, and those humans are 'god'. And he's NOT considered a loony bird by the scientific community! Watch Through the Wormhole, with Morgan Freeman. You might learn some things.

 

It is a topic on why Pokemon is called Satan, not a religious debate on religion in and of itself. Also, we are so off topic, the topic has changed.

 

Divine Grace? What an absurd name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sploda Newbie

Sploda

Posted
Posted

HA! Shows what you know! More and more scientists are turning AWAY from Evolution! Darwin even did! Scientists believe in a Creator, no matter their version. One guy thinks we are basically a video game created by Humans in the future, and those humans are 'god'. And he's NOT considered a loony bird by the scientific community! Watch Through the Wormhole, with Morgan Freeman. You might learn some things.

 

It is a topic on why Pokemon is called Satan, not a religious debate on religion in and of itself. Also, we are so off topic, the topic has changed.

 

Divine Grace? What an absurd name.

 

So wait, I'm now the topic of a scientific study?

 

I guess I should be happy, but something is off...

 

*sees needle*

 

O.O

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dark Newbie

Dark

Posted
Posted

Pokemon is considered Satan because it is considered herecy by religious leaders who think evolution is a bunch of bull.

 

Sadly for them, we've actually proven evolution (learn the difference between the theory of evolution and evolution in general, guys), so it doesn't matter.

 

And it simply shows the stupidity of religious leaders, not that they think evolution is bull, but because Pokemon evolution is NOTHING like in real life evolution.

 

"Hey, Skippy! Go bite that yarn! Oh my god, you gained 25 experience points!"

 

"What?! Skippy is evolving!"

 

*awesome music plays*

 

"Your Skippy evolved into a tiger!"

 

(Cat --> Tiger?)

 

Sense has not been made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Blake Newbie

Blake

Posted
Posted

Evolution that is real: A bird needs to reach a worm, so his beak grows longer to get into the tree with the worm. Also called adaptation.

 

Yes, 'cause cats turn into tigers all the time XD Pokemon is adaptation if you look at it. Plus, each baby resets at base form, so it's not evolution like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dark Newbie

Dark

Posted
Posted

Case and point:

 

More and more scientists are turning AWAY from Evolution! Darwin even did! Scientists believe in a Creator

 

How are scientists turning away from evolution when it's already been proven a fact? Again, the theory of evolution is still widely accepted by the scientific community, so I don't know what you are going on about.

 

Also, even if the theory of evolution was proven incorrect, that does not prove creationism is correct. Just because we didn't evolve over millions of years, that doesn't prove some magical Harry Potter came down and used his wizardly powers to create life on earth. It simply means that we didn't evolve, nothing more.

 

So again, what the hell are you going on about?

 

Adaptation takes place over millions of years, and I can evolve a Pokemon within a few hours of gameplay (which, giving a random bull expansion, we'll say is a few years).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Blake Newbie

Blake

Posted
Posted

I'm talking about how more and more, scientists are favoring the view of a creator. Whether it is themselves X amount of years in the future, or God. Evolution, the theory, is slowly being turned away from, and even Darwin refuted it.

 

The show Through the Wormhole, with Morgan Freeman, did an Episode on God, and all but one of the acclaimed scientists supported a god, and the other said that the 'God feeling' is caused by a special place in the brain, which causes an out of body experience, in which test-subjects saw 2 things: Faceless figures watching their body, as they felt like a head floating around, and nothing which had each one sweating.

 

Scientists are turning away from the theory, because as more info comes out, they can't keep on the straight thought that our intricate universe just happened.

 

Adaptation takes place over millions of years, and I can evolve a Pokemon within a few hours of gameplay (which, giving a random bull expansion, we'll say is a few years).

 

Evolution, supposedly, takes that long too. Point defeated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dark Newbie

Dark

Posted
Posted

I'm talking about how more and more, scientists are favoring the view of a creator. Whether it is themselves X amount of years in the future, or God. Evolution, the theory, is slowly being turned away from, and even Darwin refuted it.

 

I'm not entirely sure you know what the theory of evolution is. Care to summarize it for me so I can figure out if you know what the hell you are talking about?

 

The show Through the Wormhole, with Morgan Freeman, did an Episode on God, and all but one of the acclaimed scientists supported a god, and the other said that the 'God feeling' is caused by a special place in the brain, which causes an out of body experience, in which test-subjects saw 2 things: Faceless figures watching their body, as they felt like a head floating around, and nothing which had each one sweating.

 

Okay, that's wonderful. What experiences other people have should not convince anyone about anything. I could say that an invisible purple hamster came in my dreams and told me some crap, but no one is going to believe me, and for good reason. The fact that a bunch of scientists (who didn't have to be atheists in the first place) now suddenly believe in god doesn't do a thing.

 

Scientists are turning away from the theory, because as more info comes out, they can't keep on the straight thought that our intricate universe just happened.

 

Let's just assume that we have proved evolution (the theory of) incorrect. How in bloody hell does that provide a lick of proof that creationism is correct? Also, if EVOLUTION ITSELF HAS ALREADY BEEN PROVEN AS A FACT, what are you going on about? Please, tell me what you believe is the theory of evolution.

 

Evolution, supposedly, takes that long too. Point defeated.

 

Where does it say that evolution can happen within the timespan of a few years?

 

I apologize, we are getting off topic. The topic was that religious leaders who think proven evolution is false don't like Pokemon. Which just shows the stupidity of those religious leaders.

 

That just sums up the topic, imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Blake Newbie

Blake

Posted
Posted

The theory of evolution, whic hwas originated by Darwin, is the theory that as a species progresses, it slowly adapts and changes, eventually becoming a new species. It also includes splits in species leading to assorted new species. According to evolution, natural selection governs what species live, and which species die. If they can survive on X variable of an area, they live. If they cannot, they die. It is adaptation in the 'short-term', but over longer periods of time things go even further.

 

Evolution also says that once a species can no longer reproduce, it no longer has a purpose. Does that mean that when a woman goes through Menopause, as early as her 40's, she should die? Or rather, since she does not auto-die, should she be killed?

 

Oh? What you fail to realize is that experience I described? Yeah? It was by an atheist scientist. He said he thought it disproved God. To me, I say it did nothing of the sort. He told the test subjects nothig of what the experiment was for, just looked for volunteers. They all had the same experience, regardless of Religion, race, beliefs, and the like.

 

When was evolution proven, as a fact. Tell me that. I keep hearing it, and I see nothing. You can't prove something you can't see, you tell Creationists. Same here. No one has SEEN evolution, and no so called 'Missing Link' has been proven either. If we cannot see the evolution take place, we cannot prove it takes place, and thus, you have faith that i happened as I have faith in my Lord. There is no difference, just where you place your faith. So, is it so absurd to believe in something I can't see?

 

Did I say it proved creation? No. I said scientists are turning from evolution, mostly to creation. They are more and more saying it's not logically possible. Even the Big Bang is coming into question as to if it happened, and more scientists than not say there was something else, or the Big Bang is one of an infinite amount of 2 membrane dimensions colliding in a spot.

 

Look, this isn't going anywhere. You're as hardheaded as I am, so let's not have this erupt into a war. Go ahead and reply, I'd love to see your rebuttal, but we don't need to continue this after that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jeroukoo Newbie

Jeroukoo

Posted
Posted

Okay I'm going back to pokemon being Satan.

 

Pokemon is not Satan. Why is it Satan? Because it has evolution?

 

If pokemon is Satan because it has evolution in it, then wouldn't science be considered Satan? Pokemon basically become there other forums, because they are fighting and their cute cuddly forums aren't that well suited to survive in there new environment where they just continuously fight and fight, so they become more threatening and well suited to fight.

 

My theory Pokemon are extremely fast evolving creatures that so happen to have many different species that all evolve in the same way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dark Newbie

Dark

Posted
Posted

The theory of evolution, whic hwas originated by Darwin, is the theory that as a species progresses, it slowly adapts and changes, eventually becoming a new species. It also includes splits in species leading to assorted new species. According to evolution, natural selection governs what species live, and which species die. If they can survive on X variable of an area, they live. If they cannot, they die. It is adaptation in the 'short-term', but over longer periods of time things go even further.

 

What I don't understand is why you just called that a theory, when that is actually the fact of evolution. Again, you are not fully understanding what the THEORY OF EVOLUTION is.

Also, in a previous post of your's: Evolution that is real: A bird needs to reach a worm, so his beak grows longer to get into the tree with the worm. Also called adaptation.

Okay then. So you agree that adaptation is real. And yet you just said that the THEORY was that species adapt and change over millions of years.

 

Evolution also says that once a species can no longer reproduce, it no longer has a purpose. Does that mean that when a woman goes through Menopause, as early as her 40's, she should die? Or rather, since she does not auto-die, should she be killed?

 

Just because something doesn't have a purpose doesn't mean it should be put to death. You are making assumptions left and right here, honestly. From a purely evolutionist point of view, the purpose for life is to reproduce and continue your species. Once you, as an organism, cannot reproduce, you don't serve much of a purpose. Does that mean you should be put to death? Not at all, that just means you are not contributing to the population of your species, you are not bringing new life, and you are sitting there wasting all of the resources. And yet animals that become old and cannot reproduce still live within society, don't they?

 

Oh? What you fail to realize is that experience I described? Yeah? It was by an atheist scientist. He said he thought it disproved God. To me, I say it did nothing of the sort. He told the test subjects nothig of what the experiment was for, just looked for volunteers. They all had the same experience, regardless of Religion, race, beliefs, and the like.

 

Me and all of my friends had a dream one day. You (yeah, you) came down to us, and told us all you were an idiot. Now, we all had this same experience. And we are absolutely sure we had it; there is not a single doubt in any of our minds that we had this experience. Does that automatically make it true? Should that convince people to believe you are an idiot?

 

When was evolution proven, as a fact. Tell me that. I keep hearing it, and I see nothing. You can't prove something you can't see, you tell Creationists. Same here. No one has SEEN evolution, and no so called 'Missing Link' has been proven either. If we cannot see the evolution take place, we cannot prove it takes place, and thus, you have faith that i happened as I have faith in my Lord. There is no difference, just where you place your faith. So, is it so absurd to believe in something I can't see?

 

Fair enough: neither evolution nor god(s) exist. Good day, sir. I am happy we have fully came to an agreement.

The only problem with that is, evolution has actual evidence to back itself up. Just because you don't see something physically doesn't mean it fails to exist. It still can (and does, in the case of evolution) exist if sufficient proof is provided. I suggest you use almighty Google and read the "internet", because there is ample amount of proof to convince most of the world that evolution is, in fact, a fact.

 

Did I say it proved creation? No. I said scientists are turning from evolution, mostly to creation. They are more and more saying it's not logically possible. Even the Big Bang is coming into question as to if it happened, and more scientists than not say there was something else, or the Big Bang is one of an infinite amount of 2 membrane dimensions colliding in a spot.

 

That's purely wonderful. Just because a bunch of scientists turn from evolution to creationism doesn't mean that makes either correct. Oh, and by the way, they can't turn away from the FACT that evolution exists. They can surely turn away from the theory (which you still don't get), but not the fact. Although religious leaders can turn away from the fact, they are just badass like that.

 

Look, this isn't going anywhere. You're as hardheaded as I am, so let's not have this erupt into a war. Go ahead and reply, I'd love to see your rebuttal, but we don't need to continue this after that.

 

I'm not hardheaded: I've said many times before, show me proof of creationism and I'll believe it. Show me proof of God and I'll believe in him. Show me proof of an invisible flying spaghetti unicorn of fluffiness and death and I'll believe in... it. And yes, we don't need to continue. This is a poorly-constructed debate as it is, seeing as you still can't comprehend what the theory of evolution is, which plays a big part in this "debate".

 

Okay I'm going back to pokemon being Satan.

 

Pokemon is not Satan. Why is it Satan? Because it has evolution?

 

If pokemon is Satan because it has evolution in it, then wouldn't science be considered Satan? Pokemon basically become there other forums, because they are fighting and their cute cuddly forums aren't that well suited to survive in there new environment where they just continuously fight and fight, so they become more threatening and well suited to fight.

 

My theory Pokemon are extremely fast evolving creatures that so happen to have many different species that all evolve in the same way.

 

Anything that goes against the Bible (or religious leaders, in general) is considered herecy. And apparently Satan was a heretic? The fact that Pokemon has evolution, and the fact that many idiotic religious leaders don't believe in the fact that is evolution, means that Pokemon is a sin, and anyone who plays it is condemned to an eternal life in hell.

 

Also, we are all going to hell. That's what a lot of people say. :]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...