Lexadin Posted December 1, 2011 Report Share Posted December 1, 2011 @Max: 'A Friends Spirit' is a tad more complicated then what was shown in the fic.Both cards are pretty nice. I'm not so shure about there usefullness though. A different topic, as I was searching in Pixiv, I found the most awesome Gem-Knight sig. If you want to see it, it's in my sig. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted December 1, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 1, 2011 @Max: 'A Friends Spirit' is a tad more complicated then what was shown in the fic.Both cards are pretty nice. I'm not so shure about there usefullness though. "Beyond Gallantry" is far more useful in my view than "A Friend's Spirit", simply because the oppertunity to use it will come up more often, and it gives a draw. "A Friend's Spirit" is only useful in single-strategy Decks (ie "HEROs", "Gem-Knights", "(Synchro) Warriors", "Fableds", "Wind-Ups", "Gishki", "Advanced Ritual Art" etc), but can provide a useful OTK, as you saw. Otherwise, it can give your monster extra protection if it covers an effect that negates destruction or prevents effect activation. A different topic, as I was searching in Pixiv, I found the most awesome Gem-Knight sig. If you want to see it, it's in my sig. That is quite epic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted December 2, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 I can't believe this! I just bought a small number of HA05 packs (got the three basic "Gem-Knights" so I'm happy), and saw that Ritual Monsters now have 'Cannot be Normal Summoned or Set.' in their effects! Why?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master White Posted December 2, 2011 Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 Interesting Picture you got there, lex....Well, it looks decent..... @All: Well,I'm sure you know who this is, but in case you are wondering, its White Archaic Daemon, but I've changed it to this name, don't ask why, please.....lol......... Anyhow, I'll be off for awhile, building halo reach maps, work,and working on a new fun way to win a duel, not sure how to yet, but I figured on making the effects rely on attaching stuff..... Well, ttyl..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master White Posted December 2, 2011 Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 @Max: So, in essence of my idea of attaching cards, would it actually be allowed? Like gamplay mechanics or whatnot? Just curious as you normally say stuff, but you didn't last time, so I have to wonder.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted December 2, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 @Max: So, in essence of my idea of attaching cards, would it actually be allowed? Like gamplay mechanics or whatnot? Just curious as you normally say stuff, but you didn't last time, so I have to wonder.... It's a perfectly legal idea. Konami just hasn't used it yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master White Posted December 2, 2011 Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 @Max: Ah, okay, thank you, I was just wondering b/c some my idea's in the past you have told me it won't work b/c of gameplay mechanics and etc.... So, another person I was talking to for some help was trying to say because of taking Xyz mechanics it won't work, or something to similiar to that effect, so I had to make sure.... So, if I end up getting a lot of complaints it won't work in RC, what should I do? Just curious... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted December 2, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 2, 2011 @Max: Ah, okay, thank you, I was just wondering b/c some my idea's in the past you have told me it won't work b/c of gameplay mechanics and etc.... So, another person I was talking to for some help was trying to say because of taking Xyz mechanics it won't work, or something to similiar to that effect, so I had to make sure.... The effects you're planning do not rely on Xyz Mechanics, but Attach Mechanics. The two are related, but can be used independantly. So, if I end up getting a lot of complaints it won't work in RC, what should I do? Just curious... You shouldn't since I've already posted at least fours with Spell/Trap-attaching effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master White Posted December 3, 2011 Report Share Posted December 3, 2011 @Max: Ah, thank you, I got it now.....well, thank you ery much, now I can continue it again.....after I make a christmas thunder end dragon.....geez, got myself in lots of work....Need to find HQ pics of santa shoes, santa hat, a christmas themed tutu and a christmas background....ugh... Oh, is this legitimate for attach mechanics? Name: Skylie MisfortuneAttribute: N/ALevel: N/AType: Continuous Spell CardLore:Attach 2 Monster Cards you control to this card. Once per turn, during your End Phase: Detach 1 card from this card and target 1 monster your opponent controls; Banish that target. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted December 3, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 3, 2011 I sometimes hate the people on YCM. In response to my "Beyond Gallantry" card I showed you page ago, someone wrote that it's terrible because of two things. One, because of (what I would call balancing clause) the fact it locks the banished target in the Banished Zone. She said that it seals off a valuable resource, by using the example of "Tour Guide"-"Levair" Decks... You know, the ones that run purely Effect Monsters, and so cannot be considered for "Beyond Gallantry's" use(!) She then goes on to say that because it requires Normal Monsters, no Deck can run it consistantly. How about...Normal Monster Decks? Or "Advanced Ritual Art" Decks? Or "Gem-Knight" Decks? All three of which run high numbers of Normal Monsters, a little banishing and probably no real Banish-Return. So what's the problem with locking out one monster you couldn't get back anyway? And considering it doesn't seem to have hit her that most Normal-centric Decks run two or even three of their core monsters ("Blue-Eyes", "Alexandrite", "Garnet" and "Tourmaline"), losing one to the Banished Zone is not too bad, since you've got another two to run with. (And in the "Gem-Knights'" case, the correct Fusion Materials) *Sigh* EDIT: Did a little digging and found that despite having almost 12,000 posts, she's been most active in...(you guessed it!)...Roleplaying... @Max: Ah, thank you, I got it now.....well, thank you ery much, now I can continue it again.....after I make a christmas thunder end dragon.....geez, got myself in lots of work....Need to find HQ pics of santa shoes, santa hat, a christmas themed tutu and a christmas background....ugh... Oh, is this legitimate for attach mechanics? Name: Skylie MisfortuneAttribute: N/ALevel: N/AType: Continuous Spell CardLore:Attach 2 Monster Cards you control to this card. Once per turn, during your End Phase: Detach 1 card from this card and target 1 monster your opponent controls; Banish that target. That should be fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master White Posted December 4, 2011 Report Share Posted December 4, 2011 @Max: Some people just don't know how to gie the proper feedback yet high members want feedback, so others start giving what they think is right when darn god truth is they are feeding BS b/c thats the only way they can post on a card they like without getting banned for a day by Icy or another mod...... Its just goes to show you how power ruins online......I believe no "One" entity should by controlling, but everyone a part of it should, yet in this day an age, utpia's can't exist becuase people will always want more of what they don't have or not enough of........ ----- Well, anyhow, thank you for that advisement, that woks for me on the spell card.....Now, lets say someone attaches an Xyz Material out of stupidity, does the Attachments come with it? Just wondering.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Necro Pheonix Posted December 4, 2011 Report Share Posted December 4, 2011 Oh my god, its great to see that this place is still up and running. Well, hello my friends, wonderful to see you all again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted December 4, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 4, 2011 Oh my god, its great to see that this place is still up and running. Well, hello my friends, wonderful to see you all again. Welcome back! Yeah...you just came into a rant...sorry. Well, anyhow, thank you for that advisement, that woks for me on the spell card.....Now, lets say someone attaches an Xyz Material out of stupidity, does the Attachments come with it? Just wondering.... I don't understand. Do you mean an Xyz Monster? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Necro Pheonix Posted December 4, 2011 Report Share Posted December 4, 2011 If I waited until everyone was done ranting, you'd never hear from me again xD Sorry to say, but im a bit behind in the advancements of the game. I've heard of the Xyz monsters, but ive pretty much given up on the game. I just came back to get back in touch with my friends Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted December 4, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 4, 2011 If I waited until everyone was done ranting, you'd never hear from me again xD Don't worry. I was just shouting at a pair of terrible reviews someone gave two cards I posted. Needless to say, I put them right...brutally. Sorry to say, but im a bit behind in the advancements of the game. I've heard of the Xyz monsters, but ive pretty much given up on the game. I just came back to get back in touch with my friends That's fine. Just don't mention them around Lex. He's rather...touchy...about them. And all of us are of the mindset Konami is either constantly shooting itself in the foot, or plain doesn't care what it's making. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Necro Pheonix Posted December 4, 2011 Report Share Posted December 4, 2011 Good to see nothings changed this past year. I might attempt making another card, but unfortunately, my computer wont generate the pictures of the cards i've already made (Just the center part), or my profile picture, etc. Everyone elses shows up fine. Any ideas how to fix it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted December 4, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 4, 2011 Good to see nothings changed this past year. Pretty much(!) I might attempt making another card, but unfortunately, my computer wont generate the pictures of the cards i've already made (Just the center part), or my profile picture, etc. Everyone elses shows up fine. Any ideas how to fix it? The Card Maker is broken at the moment, that much I know. As for your Avi, it's a case of the picture either being too big, or being an incorrect format. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted December 4, 2011 Report Share Posted December 4, 2011 Welcome back Phoenix. Good to see an old member again. *tips hat* So, did I miss anything while I was gone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted December 4, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 4, 2011 So, did I miss anything while I was gone? Me putting someone right. http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/topic/270107-a-couple-of-singles-normal-and-extra-deck-support/ Not sure what else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted December 4, 2011 Report Share Posted December 4, 2011 Me putting someone right. http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/topic/270107-a-couple-of-singles-normal-and-extra-deck-support/ Not sure what else. Kinda already commented on those... Not in that thread though. Probebly not much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted December 4, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 4, 2011 Kinda already commented on those... Not in that thread though. I wasn't pandering for comments, I was just despairing at the lack of knowledge some members have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master White Posted December 4, 2011 Report Share Posted December 4, 2011 @Max: Yea, the card said attach 2 monster cards, so Xyz's are considered monsters, right? If I say exceed, I mean Xyz even though they were suppose to be called exceeds...... So, if an idiot decides to attach an Xyz to the spll card, would its attachments(if any) would go to? I thought about doing an Xyz union, so this answer would answer 2 questions.... @Necro: Welcome back, Not sure if you remember me, or any of these names, but here's a list... XyZGeneral WhiteMaster WhiteWhite Archaic DaemonSkylie Yes, I've changed names a few, but when i get a name in my head I like, wel, thats what happens..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted December 4, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 4, 2011 @Max: Yea, the card said attach 2 monster cards, so Xyz's are considered monsters, right? If I say exceed, I mean Xyz even though they were suppose to be called exceeds...... So, if an idiot decides to attach an Xyz to the spll card, would its attachments(if any) would go to? I thought about doing an Xyz union, so this answer would answer 2 questions.... Both Attached cards and Xyz Materials are not treated as Monster Cards, so if an Xyz Monster with Xyz Material(s) or a monster with Attached cards is attached to a card through an effect, it loses its Xyz Materials/Attached cards; except if the card effect states that the new card carries the materials/attachments of the original card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master White Posted December 5, 2011 Report Share Posted December 5, 2011 @Max: Ah, okay, I see now, thank you......So unless it states it otherise, the materials will go to the grave...got it...Oh, that Tsubaki is just post counter IMO, gets posts so he/she throws BS around.... @Anyone: Has any of you seen lately that RC is getting lots of nwebs thinking they know hat they are talking about? I found abut 5 threads where Rag was actually correct(Which amazes me, even though he usually is to a point) yet they go ahead fight their logic and lose by there thread getting no more comers.......You'd think they'd respect someones opinions when they are older members like you, Lex, Rag, and etc.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted December 5, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 5, 2011 @Max: Ah, okay, I see now, thank you......So unless it states it otherise, the materials will go to the grave...got it...Oh, that Tsubaki is just post counter IMO, gets posts so he/she throws BS around.... Exactly. See "Chaos Number 39: Utopia Ray" for how to word Material-carrying effects. @Anyone: Has any of you seen lately that RC is getting lots of nwebs thinking they know hat they are talking about? I found abut 5 threads where Rag was actually correct(Which amazes me, even though he usually is to a point) yet they go ahead fight their logic and lose by there thread getting no more comers.......You'd think they'd respect someones opinions when they are older members like you, Lex, Rag, and etc.... Well, I've got a moron trying to argue that my "Neptunian Princess" card can never be used, since getting two Level 5 monsters on the field is too much to justify. He also seems to not understand the '(You can use printed Level 5 monsters for this card's placing)' clause, even though I've pointed it out to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.