Lexadin Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 I'm trying not to use staples, since that makes everything very one-sided. Mhh, that does explain a lot. (My actual Gem-Knight Deck is filled with them actually.) Also I just discovered 2 things about Charly McCoy from watching epp 31 & 32 of ZeXal.1. He's a pedofile. As he actually (french)kissed Yuma's sister when she was still quite young. And he was oviously an adult back then.2. Remember that background story you created for that Gemini user? Well he also gives his Number to a girl (possibly another romantic interest seeing as she's a minor) to help her through a surgery. Not exactly the same. But it did remind me of him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted November 27, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 Mhh, that does explain a lot. (My actual Gem-Knight Deck is filled with them actually.) Hence why you don't have "Rescue Rabbit", "Mirror Force", "Heavy Storm" etc. Also I just discovered 2 things about Charly McCoy from watching epp 31 & 32 of ZeXal.1. He's a pedofile. As he actually (french)kissed Yuma's sister when she was still quite young. And he was oviously an adult back then.2. Remember that background story you created for that Gemini user? Well he also gives his Number to a girl (possibly another romantic interest seeing as she's a minor) to help her through a surgery. Not exactly the same. But it did remind me of him. 1. What a rolemodel(!)2. Slyvia had a "Number", Daichi didn't. Kaito stole "Number 40", and then Daichi destroyed it.Looks like Konami is running out of ideas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 Hence why you don't have "Rescue Rabbit", "Mirror Force", "Heavy Storm" etc. Mhh, with that reasoning I think the Deck is quite good. Though 'Supervise' and some more 'Sanyx's' is still a preverence imo. 1. What a rolemodel(!)2. Slyvia had a "Number", Daichi didn't. Kaito stole "Number 40", and then Daichi destroyed it.Looks like Konami is running out of ideas. 1. I know right. Hence she has mixed feelings about him.2. Mhh, well it's still quite simulair.I thought the entire beginning of ZeXal should've given that away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted November 27, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 Mhh, with that reasoning I think the Deck is quite good. Though 'Supervise' and some more 'Sanyx's' is still a preverence imo. Okay. A duel or two will see what happens. 1. I know right. Hence she has mixed feelings about him.2. Mhh, well it's still quite simulair.I thought the entire beginning of ZeXal should've given that away. Good point. Writer 1: "Isn't this World Duel Carnival quite similar to the other tournaments we've written?"Writer 2: "What do you mean?"Writer 1: "Well, this has the same idea as Star Chips from Duelist Kingdom and Locator Cards from Battle City, the same true motive as the Fortune Cup, and the same basic rivals as the Dark Signer arc..."Writer 2: I see what your saying but...Xyzs!!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 Okay. A duel or two will see what happens. Indeed it will. Good point. Writer 1: "Isn't this World Duel Carnival quite similar to the other tournaments we've written?"Writer 2: "What do you mean?"Writer 1: "Well, this has the same idea as Star Chips from Duelist Kingdom and Locator Cards from Battle City, the same true motive as the Fortune Cup, and the same basic rivals as the Dark Signer arc..."Writer 2: I see what your saying but...Xyzs!!" I think that's what actually happened when they wrote this... Or at least that final part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted November 27, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 I think that's what actually happened when they wrote this... Or at least that final part. I wouldn't doubt it. Also, I know you don't rate Xyzs, but would you just look at the general effect and see if it's actually useful? http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/topic/269692-kitsune-of-the-red-lotus/page__fromsearch__1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 I wouldn't doubt it. Also, I know you don't rate Xyzs, but would you just look at the general effect and see if it's actually useful? http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/topic/269692-kitsune-of-the-red-lotus/page__fromsearch__1 Mhh, well it would be quite usefull for Decks that use 'Rescue Rabit' and such. And it's ATK seems to be high enough. I'd say it would be a good addition to Vanilla using Decks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master White Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 So, now zexal has perverts or just really young tall lovers? B/c bare in mind, I have friends that are 12 to 13 that are 6 ft......Which quite frankly are taller then me...... Anyhow, in the united states, your not considered a pervert unless you are 18 or older liking girls that are 12 or younger....... ----- Anyhow, Written Section has a way different mindset then Realistic Section.... I made a glad Synchro and the Written Section said overpowered, and RC is claiming its not playable and underpowered...... So, really, I'm starting to say I want people on the Written Section to judge my cards, they sem to have a better mindset.... -------------- @Max: Do me a favor and make a card-any card and put it in the written section if you would please.....You don't have to, but I'd appreciate to see what comes out of it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 So, now zexal has perverts or just really young tall lovers? B/c bare in mind, I have friends that are 12 to 13 that are 6 ft......Which quite frankly are taller then me...... Anyhow, in the united states, your not considered a pervert unless you are 18 or older liking girls that are 12 or younger....... ----- Anyhow, Written Section has a way different mindset then Realistic Section.... I made a glad Synchro and the Written Section said overpowered, and RC is claiming its not playable and underpowered...... So, really, I'm starting to say I want people on the Written Section to judge my cards, they sem to have a better mindset.... -------------- @Max: Do me a favor and make a card-any card and put it in the written section if you would please.....You don't have to, but I'd appreciate to see what comes out of it... As far as I can tell, there have been 2 people who where attracted to minors. 1st the Tomato guy (presumable an adult as he has a farm and can geneticly alter vegies) who was atracted to Kotori (who is 13).2nd time was when Charlie McCoy kissed Akari (Yuma's sister) when she was (about) 15 while he was an adult (I think at least 23). So yeah, I call that perverted. And here in the Netherlands it is forbidden in the law for an 18-year-old (or older) to have an relationship with someone younger then 16. ---- Maybe you can show it to me, then I can judge if it's Really UP or OP. Also your Deck is in progress. Though it might take a couple of days. Seeing as I'm not the best Deckconstructer after dark and I probebly won't be home before dark tomorow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master White Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 @Lex: Well, here is the original one that written saw which was overpowered and yet unplayable in the RC.... Mangaroose was going to be its original name, so replace that with the name of this card... I know its op'd in my mind, written calls it opd, but RC section calls it up'd..... and take your time on the Deck, if you can even pull it off that is...it wasn't fully an Otk, but the fact was, you could repeat the process up to 3 times if everything went right.... ------- @Lex: Well, we do have a law where an 18 or older male starts dating a girl younger is illegal, and the parents can do stuff, but if all there doing is holding hands and the parents can't prove sexual stuff is invovled, is plum fine.... But vise versa, won't care unless its guy/guy type deal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted November 27, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 Mhh, well it would be quite usefull for Decks that use 'Rescue Rabit' and such. And it's ATK seems to be high enough. I'd say it would be a good addition to Vanilla using Decks. Excellent. I'll write a duel with your "Gem-Knight" Deck and continue my work on the "Red Lotus" archetype. @ White 1: I'll post one in a while. @ White 2: That is seriously underpowered. In fact, it is unplayable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master White Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 @Max: Yet written section called it overpowered..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 @Lex: Well, here is the original one that written saw which was overpowered and yet unplayable in the RC.... Mangaroose was going to be its original name, so replace that with the name of this card... I know its op'd in my mind, written calls it opd, but RC section calls it up'd..... and take your time on the Deck, if you can even pull it off that is...it wasn't fully an Otk, but the fact was, you could repeat the process up to 3 times if everything went right.... ------- @Lex: Well, we do have a law where an 18 or older male starts dating a girl younger is illegal, and the parents can do stuff, but if all there doing is holding hands and the parents can't prove sexual stuff is invovled, is plum fine.... But vise versa, won't care unless its guy/guy type deal Honestl how can they call this OP?! I mean the GB's hardly have any sinergy with Tuners. And why would Anyone be using his/her 'Gyzarus' for this card. Eh, there has to be something really wrong with the people in Written Cards Section. Excellent. I'll write a duel with your "Gem-Knight" Deck and continue my work on the "Red Lotus" archetype. Excelent, I shall await it then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted November 27, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 @ Lex: Note also it needs two Tuners. Two Level 1s, along with "Gyzarus". They seriously don't know what they're talking about. @ White: I'm going to post my "Matador Chevalier" card in Written Cards, and see what reaction I get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 @ Lex: Note also it needs two Tuners. Two Level 1s, along with "Gyzarus". They seriously don't know what they're talking about. Which makes it even less playable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted November 27, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 Which makes it even less playable. It's getting into "Final Destiny" levels of unplayable isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 It's getting into "Final Destiny" levels of unplayable isn't it? That might be stretching it, but it is quite close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master White Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 @Max: It will take a while to get people to comment on it..... @Lex: So, its up'd....dang, I have to wonder though why they called it op'd......hmm...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted November 27, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 @Max: It will take a while to get people to comment on it..... @Lex: So, its up'd....dang, I have to wonder though why they called it op'd......hmm...... It's because they don't understand how the game works in real life. Yes, Synchro Decks and "Gladiator Beasts" Decks are powerful. However, it doesn't mean that if they combine together that they're broken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master White Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 @Max: Odd thing is, it was from 5 star members which usually know what they are talking about I thought..... I actually had someone from the Written Section fight ther honor in the RC and won, so you have to wonder.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted November 27, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 @Max: Odd thing is, it was from 5 star members which usually know what they are talking about I thought..... I actually had someone from the Written Section fight ther honor in the RC and won, so you have to wonder.... Stars are just a measure of posts. Someone might post heavily in RP, but know jack-sh*t about cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 Stars are just a measure of posts. Someone might post heavily in RP, but know jack-sh*t about cards. Exactly. Most of my posts are from C&O. And I know plenty of people here who don't know the first thing about the YGO TCG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master White Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 Yea, but guaranteed if I told them off bout it being underpowered, they would bring 3 or 4 things up saying why its op'd, like the effect is op'd, but the summoning hard, need to balance that out excuse......They have done that to me several times.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted November 27, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 Yea, but guaranteed if I told them off bout it being underpowered, they would bring 3 or 4 things up saying why its op'd, like the effect is op'd, but the summoning hard, need to balance that out excuse......They have done that to me several times.... Okay. Link me, and I'll rubbish all their arguments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 Yea, but guaranteed if I told them off bout it being underpowered, they would bring 3 or 4 things up saying why its op'd, like the effect is op'd, but the summoning hard, need to balance that out excuse......They have done that to me several times.... *sigh* The effect is strong to ballance out it's hard summoning conditions. That's one of the first rules of YGO. 'Obelisk' has an power eff aswell, but that doesn't mean it's a good card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.