Jump to content

The Amazing Card Contest! STARTING FINAL ROUND!


SirtyStan

Recommended Posts

Thank you Zumzik for your new entry, and Dranzer too. We only need Dchi...

 

Final note for Zmuzik: Hmm... I don't think that somebody like you would put so much effort into your card (holoing, borders, etc.) for such a small contest... Are you being lazy? Have you used the card anywhere else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 127
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Thank you Zumzik for your new entry' date=' and Dranzer too. We only need Dchi...

 

Final note for Zmuzik: Hmm... I don't think that somebody like you would put so much effort into your card (holoing, borders, etc.) for such a small contest... Are you being lazy? Have you used the card anywhere else?

[/quote']

 

First of all, I holo the borders depending on the name of the card. This one dealt with 4 different elements, so I bordered the outside rainbow. I used a similar idea before, but it was only for LIGHT and DARK. Also, I tend to edit my images - For this one in particular, I took a picture of a typical island and added light effects to make it element-like. I hope this answers your questions :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oh - oh -ohhohh! Now 2 guys got banned during this contest O.O

 

Fi....Fie....FIELDSPELLCARDS!!!! I love to see them as condition - thx, sirtrystan^^

 

First @ all remaining contestants: Congratulations - you got into the FINAL ROUND!!!

 

--------------------------------------------------------------->>>

zmuzik - Immortal Elemental Release Grounds

 

Originality: 2/2

Spelling/OCG: 2,5/3

Picture: 1/2

Minor Details (Set name/number, Code, date/creator): 1/1

OP'edness/Effect: 2/2

 

Total: 8,5/10.

 

FINAL NOTES: God you didn't use the first card (colloseum thing) since it was a stolen pic from an already existing card with a few gimp-novas. Well, these novas are here, too... Nothing against your styling of cards but I think holo-effects are for reality cards only... it makes the image kinda ..blurry and dark. Although you have minor OCG errors (really minor but sry I can't ignore them) it is balanced and very original. As long as you play only 1 attribute (except light and dark) you can use it pretty well. The drawback is also okay.

--------------------------------------------------------------->>>

Dranzer123 - Back to the Ancient Land

 

Originality: 2/2

Spelling/OCG: 1/3

Picture: 1/2

Minor Details (Set name/number, Code, date/creator): 1/1

OP'edness/Effect: 0,5/2

 

Total: 5,5/10.

 

FINAL NOTES: I wanted to see a pretty landscape but a slight haze blocked my view. This image-effect ruined the pic a little :( The christmas-margin and the white border of the image are also unnecessary.. To revive warriors when they deal damage is okay but right now it's quite OPed since you need to attack with a lonely 1600-ATK-warrior directly and revive another 1600-ATK-warrior which also attacks directly and deals damge which will lead into another SS and so on... There is no Level Limit and no "Once-per-turn-limit). The tribute of a warrior by activating is the only drawback. Your OCG has way too many errors:

one = 1

be activate = be activated (that's passive)

warrior deal damage = warrior deals damage

graveyard = Graveyard

there are others....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just wanted to give you a heads up that my card is going to be turned in relatively close to the deadline...I've been stuck at work every day since Thursday, (and I have to go in again today), but I'll try to get this all finished up tonight.

 

I apologize to the judges and the contestants that you have to wait so long for my card. I've got a lot going on and I'm trying to balance it all out without going crazy, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just wanted to give you a heads up that my card is going to be turned in relatively close to the deadline...I've been stuck at work every day since Thursday' date=' (and I have to go in again today), but I'll try to get this all finished up tonight.

 

I apologize to the judges and the contestants that you have to wait so long for my card. I've got a lot going on and I'm trying to balance it all out without going crazy, lol.

[/quote']

 

That's okay - I think. I hope you put much effort into the card anyway^^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure thing. If it's not too late, I'll rate it. If I can't then Spikeball and PARANOiA_brother_Sparky can find the averages (found at the bottom of the Round 2 Spoiler) and determine the winner. If that happens, then the winners will expect their rewards on Tuesday, July 27th. I am also giving out early reps for the Judges because I believe that they want their payment ASAP.


Will give out PARANOiA_brother_Sparky's rep tomorrow morning XD


Because I ran out of reps to give today...


Zmuzik's card: Immortal Elemental Release Grounds

 

Originality: 2/2

Spelling/OCG: 3/3

Picture: 2/2

Minor Details (Set name/number, Code, date/creator): 1/1

OP'edness/Effect: 1/2

 

Total: 9.0/10.

 

FINAL NOTES: I find absolutely nothing wrong with it. It's just the last part of the effect makes me wonder...

 

"When an EARTH, WIND, FIRE, or WATER monster you control is destroyed, you can remove from play 2 monsters in your Graveyard with the same Attribute as the destroyed monster to Special Summon it to your side of the field in face-up Defense Position. When this card is destroyed, your opponent can Special Summon up to 2 monsters in their Graveyard with the same Attributes to their side of the field in face-up Defense Position."

 

So... Does that mean if you Special Summon back a FIRE and a WATER monster in the time that this Field Spell is on the field, does that mean that your opponent can Special Summon 2 monsters that have to be both FIRE and WATER?


Dranzer123's card: Back to the Ancient Land

 

Originality: 2/2

Spelling/OCG: 2/3

Picture: 2/2

Minor Details (Set name/number, Code, date/creator): 0.5/1

OP'edness/Effect: 1/2

 

Total: 7.5/10.

 

FINAL NOTES: Your card says this:

 

"This card can only be activate by sending one Warrior-type monster from your field to your graveyard. When this card is activated, all the monster on the field except Warrior-type monsters are halve its ATK. When a Warrior-type on your side of the field deal damage to your opponent, you can special summon one Warrior-type monster from your graveyard to your field."

 

It should really be (bolded the mistakes):

 

"This card can only be activated by sending one Warrior-type monster from your field to your Graveyard. When this card is activated, all the monsters on the field except Warrior-type monsters ATK's are halved. When a Warrior-type monster on DELETED THIS PART the field deals damage to the opposing player, that player can Special Summon one Warrior-type monster from their Graveyard to their side of the field."

 

I don't know what the "KJ" of the "KJ425" is, but again I say this, no set has 425+ cards in them...

 

Also, Field Spell cards are supposed to help/punish both players, not just help/punish you or them.


Not trying to sound cruel, but really...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was suprised for a support card. It messes up Toon monsters though...

 

Dchi's card: Toon Realm

 

Originality: 1/2

Spelling/OCG: 3/3

Picture: 2/2

Minor Details (Set name/number, Code, date/creator): 1/1

OP'edness/Effect: 1/2

 

Total: 8.0/10.

 

FINAL NOTES: Since there are a lot

of Toon support cards (such as "Toon Table of Contents"), I don't find the card to be that original. It messes up Toons because on their card, they say "If "Toon World" is destroyed, this card is also destroyed.", so if you have both on the field and even one of them dies, even though there is a Toon World on the field till, they all still die... It's also a bit OP'ed, even though your opponent can use it too. Not as OP'ed as "Geartown" though, and I'm glad for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dchi - Toon Realm

 

Originality: 1,5/2

Spelling/OCG: 3/3

Picture: 2/2

Minor Details (Set name/number, Code, date/creator): 1/1

OP'edness/Effect: 1/2

 

Total: 8.5/10.

 

FINAL NOTES: Yes, I always wanted Toon World to be a Field Spell since it's name was Toon World^^ Picture fits perfectly :3 But Sirtrystan made a good point: "Toon Table of Contents" and isn't there also "Toon Kingdom" (found in video games). With this card you eliminated all remaining weaknesses of toons but is it really necessary to do this? The "(anti-)tribute-effect" is something you could have left out...

All in all good card


@PARANOiA_Brother_Sparky: Everything lies in your hands now^^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

................BUMP........................


Please PARANOiA_Brother_Sparky, think of the ones who wonna have their rewards!

 

@zmuzik; dchi; dranzer123: Sorry for the wait...


current ranking:

1st: zextra ------(8,75)

2nd: dchi --------(8,25)

3rd: dranzer123 --(6,5)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

Sorry I needed to get that out.

Here are ur grades!

 

Zextra:

 

Originality: 1.5/2

Spelling/OCG: 3/3

Picture: 2/2

Minor Details (Set name/number, Code, date/creator): 1/1

OP'edness/Effect: 1.5/2

 

Total: 9/10.

 

Final Notes: I sooooooooooo wish this card was real. I would use it a lot, given I run a Charmer/Fortune Lady Deck. In fact, I might get the card code and promote it in my sig. This card just trips that much balls.

 

Dranzer123:

 

Originality: 1.5/2

Spelling/OCG: 1.5/3

Picture: 1/2

Minor Details (Set name/number, Code, date/creator): 1/1

OP'edness/Effect: 1/2

 

Total: 6/10.

 

Final Notes: I gotta say, a Warrior based deck would really benefit form something like this, but it is too OP. I'd recommend the summoning effect but not halving the ATK, as long as the summoned monster could not attack that turn. That seems fair enough to me.

 

dchi:

 

Originality: 2/2

Spelling/OCG: 2.5/3

Picture: 2/2

Minor Details (Set name/number, Code, date/creator): 1/1

OP'edness/Effect: .5/2

 

Total: 8/10.

 

Final Notes: A Toon Field is a wonderful idea, but I do not really think this was quite executed for the benefit. Yes it does act as a way to keep Toon World active, but I would recommend a different secondary effect, perhaps to power-up toons, prevent LP payment for Toon attacks, etc.

 

HA! Done!

.......

I really need to learn to keep up with my contest judging.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you, Sparky - at least it's done now^^

 

Here are the FINAL RANKINGS (based on the Average of all in this round given ratings):

[align=center]

1st: Zextra (9,167)

2nd: dchi (8,167)

3rd: Dranzer123 (6,33)[/align]

 

Sirtrystan will give the rewards in the end of the week, I think. At least this was his contest^^

 

 

 

CONTEST FINISHED!!!

CONTEST FINISHED!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...