Aqua Girl Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 Rules: 1: All standard YCM ruels apply. 2: Must be a monster. 3: The card must support Dragon-Type monsters. 4: You must Give a valid reason to your vote. 5: I will moderate Mars's votes. He will Moderate mine. 6: first to 5 wins winer gets +1 rep and 100 points.(just a friendly comp no big rewards) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tainted Black Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 Workin' on mine now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aqua Girl Posted June 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 This card is treated as Dragon-Type monster while face up on the field. Your opponet cannot select another Dragon-Type monster as an attack target. If your opponet activates a Spell, Trap, or Monster effect that would destroy a Dragon-Type monster(s) on your side of the field you must Tribute this card to negate the Activation of that card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tainted Black Posted June 17, 2010 Report Share Posted June 17, 2010 [spoiler=Lore]This card is treated as Dragon-Type monster while face up on the field. This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Special Summoned by removing from play 1 Dragon-type monster in your Graveyard . This card's ATK and DEF are equal to the Original ATK and DEF of the removed Monster, respectively. If this card would be destroyed by battle, you can remove from play 1 Dragon-type monster in your Graveyard. If this card would be destroyed by an effect, you can discard 1 Dragon-type monster to negate the activation and effect of the Card and destroy it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sploda Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 I'm going to have to vote for Black on this one. His card can actually strike back, while it must also only be Special Summoned. The only part I don't like about the effect is the constant removal from play. But in the end it is more helpful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tainted Black Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 Me: 1Aqua: 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shizuku Oikawa Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 Vote for Aqua.D-Tamer helps other dragons, while Knight use other dragons to help himself.D-Tamer seems like a slightly better support Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andx Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 Let's see. Aqua's seems more like Dragon support whereas Black's seems to have dragons support it. But protecting dragons and using dragons both count as dragon support so that's unimportant. Prepare for a decently long post just to get to a vote. Aqua's Card:I don't see why a card with 0 ATK and 0 DEF isn't a one star but that's a minor complaint. So we have a 0/0 monster that gets treated as a dragon, your opponent has to attack it instead of another dragon and the moment something that would destroy a dragon is activated you have to tribute this to get rid of it. So how was the second effect intended to be used? Placing this on the field either makes it a free direct attack for your opponent due to it having no ATK or it being a worthless defense if it's face down. Either way I don't see it getting to face up defense so that it won't hurt the user of the card and its effects can activate. So what it comes down to if I use it is: my opponent gets to hit me essentially directly so that one attack can't be aimed at a dragon I control. Not something I would be willing to risk personally. Black's Card:One thing is the artwork looks more like a yugioh card than Aqua's but that's not important. So one dragon's stats get to come back in this thing as it gets special summoned by removing a dragon from play. One problem, I see that it was meant to be saved from being destroyed by battle if you remove a dragon from play. However the wording of the card doesn't say that. It just says you can remove a dragon from play if the card gets destroyed by battle. So in the end I get: A potentially strong monster that gets protection from being destroyed by battle or effect as long as I have dragons in the graveyard. Vote: Marsuvees Black. Something that has protection and can do damage is superior to something that gives one very weak and damaging shield to your dragons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tainted Black Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 Let me put it like this for mine... [spoiler=My Inspiration!]FGD or SIN dragon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Exodia Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 Marsuvees Black. His, even though constant removal, can actually get attack without a special ability you may not be able to have for a while. Mars has mine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aqua Girl Posted June 18, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 Well I just say its pretty stupid if you run a dragon deck with no dfence spells like T-Roar. In all honesty I looked at his card and I was like..... sheet! XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hungry Panda Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 My vote goes to black. His card effect and OCG are slightly better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aqua Girl Posted June 18, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 I'll deny that, please say what the ocg errors are and how its better. if not I deny your vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 Let's see. Aqua's seems more like Dragon support whereas Black's seems to have dragons support it. But protecting dragons and using dragons both count as dragon support so that's unimportant. Prepare for a decently long post just to get to a vote. Aqua's Card:I don't see why a card with 0 ATK and 0 DEF isn't a one star but that's a minor complaint. So we have a 0/0 monster that gets treated as a dragon' date=' your opponent has to attack it instead of another dragon and the moment something that would destroy a dragon is activated you have to tribute this to get rid of it. So how was the second effect intended to be used? Placing this on the field either makes it a free direct attack for your opponent due to it having no ATK or it being a worthless defense if it's face down. Either way I don't see it getting to face up defense so that it won't hurt the user of the card and its effects can activate. So what it comes down to if I use it is: my opponent gets to hit me essentially directly so that one attack can't be aimed at a dragon I control. Not something I would be willing to risk personally. [b']Black's Card:[/b]One thing is the artwork looks more like a yugioh card than Aqua's but that's not important. So one dragon's stats get to come back in this thing as it gets special summoned by removing a dragon from play. One problem, I see that it was meant to be saved from being destroyed by battle if you remove a dragon from play. However the wording of the card doesn't say that. It just says you can remove a dragon from play if the card gets destroyed by battle. So in the end I get: A potentially strong monster that gets protection from being destroyed by battle or effect as long as I have dragons in the graveyard. Vote: Marsuvees Black. Something that has protection and can do damage is superior to something that gives one very weak and damaging shield to your dragons. I think this says it all >.> Vote: Black Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tainted Black Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 4-1 One more vote, and I win. Or, if that guy with the Blue Eyes avi gives a reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kailyn Leona Kyosuke Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 Aqua: Your card reminds me of a fusion between Golem Dragon and Doomcali. Black: you card...I don't even. Broken beyond all hell, let's tech in 3 DDRs and 20 Return from Dif. Dimensions derp. either way, both cards are good. My vote however, goes to Aqua. Ill take the protection over giving every hopeless deck even more FTKs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tainted Black Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 How is my card Broken? It is Broken, but not beyond all hell. It protects itself by emptying your hand/grave. That would murder an REDMD deck, a very common Dragon deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kailyn Leona Kyosuke Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 How is my card Broken? It is Broken' date=' but not beyond all hell. It protects itself by emptying your hand/grave. That would murder an REDMD deck, a very common Dragon deck.[/quote'] you remove a dragon in grave to SS. easy enough with foolish/FuFu. you protect it by ditching a dragon from hand, which then becomes SSable by REDMD. Removed dragons can easily be brought back by DDR which also lessens the high-level dragons in hand just to remove for REDMD. and if you forgot, REDMD itself removes dragons to be summoned. I smell FTK. Theoretically you could also pitch synchros via gale dogra (in other words, pitch savior Demons for an instant 4000). tell me if Im wrong here, but it seriously has major setup power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tainted Black Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 ... Crap, I just noticed I messed up in the effect >.< I meant for it to remove the card in your hand from play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kailyn Leona Kyosuke Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 you're already 4 votes in...isn't it a bit late to change? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tainted Black Posted June 18, 2010 Report Share Posted June 18, 2010 Exactly... Oh well, it'll just stay as is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tainted Black Posted June 20, 2010 Report Share Posted June 20, 2010 BUMP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow Zero Posted June 20, 2010 Report Share Posted June 20, 2010 I'll vote for Blacks card. I have a tendency to like cards that can fight back better, although there is a problem with it. It says when this card would be destroyed, remove from play a dragon type monster. Does the card gain that monsters ATK then? Where is the card moved from? Why does it not say that it stops destruction by battle and simply says to rfp a dragon? the only reason why I am voting for blacks card is because it can fight back, seeing as part of the missing effect leaves much to be desired. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tainted Black Posted June 20, 2010 Report Share Posted June 20, 2010 Shadow, it says GRAVEYARD. It only gains the first monster you remove. I did forget to say the stops destruction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.