Womi Posted June 16, 2010 Report Share Posted June 16, 2010 Once again, I find disappointment. Once again, I find no satisfaction. Once again, I find that I always find more to condemn than to commend about Dark's condescending claims. As a preliminary, I want to give parents the means to protect their children. Don't let yourself be buffaloed by Dark. Don't let yourself be persuaded to believe that I'm some sort of cully who can be duped into believing that he can walk on water just because a lot of termagant tatterdemalions happen to believe that. Analyze the arguments for yourself and see if you agree with my claim that when one examines the ramifications of letting Dark engage in the trafficking of human beings, one finds a preponderance of evidence leading to the conclusion that some people are responsible and others are not. Dark falls into the category of "not". Dark's anecdotes are a mere cavil, a mere scarecrow, one of the last shifts of a desperate and dying cause. Dark's reason is not true reason. It does not seek the truth but only superficial answers, viperine resolutions to conflicts. Armed only with a white shirt, pocket protector, slide rule, thick glasses, and some other neat stuff, I have determined that if Dark feels ridiculed by all the attention my letters are bringing him, then that's just too darn bad. His arrogance has brought this upon himself. Blindly following, never asking questions, his loyalists incorporate his bestial and anger-filled tirades as their own. It becomes impossible to change their views merely by explaining that it strikes me as amusing that Dark complains about people who do nothing but complain. Well, news flash! He does nothing but complain. From a public-policy perspective, if Dark gets his way, none of us will be able to shield people from his impulsive and nefarious deceptions. Therefore, we must not let Dark discourage us from expressing our mind games in whatever way we damn well please. Simply put, if you can go more than a minute without hearing him talk about poststructuralism, you're either deaf, dumb, or in a serious case of denial. Let me mention again that if Dark honestly believes that some of my points are not valid, I would love to get some specific feedback from him. Some people think that shiftless skinheads are easily housebroken. Others believe that my empirically validated theory is that as part of his latest power grab, Dark has been interfering with a person's work performance, bodily security, physical movement, and privacy rights. The truth lies somewhere in between, namely, that I am not concerned with rumors or hearsay about him. I am interested only in ascertained facts attested by published documents and in these primarily as an illustration that if Dark thinks that absolutism can quell the hatred and disorder in our society, then he's sadly mistaken. Lastly, there are deeper issues afoot here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Βyakuya Posted June 16, 2010 Report Share Posted June 16, 2010 Why is this in the games section? I still understand your controversy with him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Womi Posted June 16, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 16, 2010 I just wanted to avoid this +1 post count spam gibberish, since this is supposed to be serious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.