Jump to content

R.P.820: A Club for RPers |_/[43 Members]\_| [~]


Blake

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 17k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

All those named beforehand are classic Nintendo characters. You can't forget the classics now can you

 

Okay then Jake, Jigglypuff. Jigglypuff is worthless. It is neither prominent, nor famous. The only reason it could POSSIBLY be in is because it was in the anime, where is was quickly dumped.

 

Then we get to Ice Climbers. They had one game from what I know of. Why are they there? They aren't considered a classic.

 

Ice got ROB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*facepalm*

 

Okay so he isn't a character, instead an accessory for the Nintendo Entertainment System, but Nintendo related either way.

 

Jigglypuff is an iconic character for Pokemon, though not as much as Pikachu. As for Ice Climbers I'll admit I have no idea why they are still there, though classic Nintendo game characters they remain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*facepalm*

 

Okay so he isn't a character, instead an accessory for the Nintendo Entertainment System, but Nintendo related either way.

 

He's not classic. He's not iconic.

 

He's f***ing R.O.B.

 

But your defense is that he's Nintendo related.

 

Vaati's Nintendo related.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ice ROB is actually classic, he is an old classic accessorymade by Nintendo. While I wont deny he isn't iconic since he hasn't been produced in such a long time, he is obviously remembered.

 

Dane Zubat is on the same level, since he also appears in the small collabe of iconic pokemon; though I can't see playing Zubat in Brawl- just saying.

 

But I wouldn't mind seeing Vaati in Brawl either way, he'd have an interesting move set to say the least

 

EDIT: I've never really been against you : / I am just saying that there are reasons why everybody is in Brawl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ice ROB is actually classic, he is an old classic accessorymade by Nintendo. While I wont deny he isn't iconic since he hasn't been produced in such a long time, he is obviously remembered.

 

No, he's not "a classic".

 

Everybody hated him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dane Zubat is on the same level, since he also appears in the small collabe of iconic pokemon; though I can't see playing Zubat in Brawl- just saying.

 

 

That was easy. You fell for a trap there Jakey-boy. Zubat is nowhere NEAR being an icon. It's hated TOO much to be considered such.

 

Iconic pokemon would be more along the lines of Pikachu, Lucario, Mewtwo, the Kanto starters, Eevee, NOT Jiggly, NOT Zubat.

 

As Lelouch said, Magikarp > Jigglypuff in terms of icons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Ice

When have you two ever taken s***?

 

When I have ever taken s***?

 

When has any of us besides those who try to prove themselves right without admitting they are wrong taken s***?

 

Everybody here has taken stuff.

 

Even Vaati.

 

...

 

...

 

But I'm better now!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nah . . . I'd rather just play Brawl.

 

Nintendo put the Brawl roster together for a reason. They also left characters out for a reason. End.of.story.

 

Now again anybody want to play me in Brawl?

 

khADKHDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDGA;VSA;S.V;ACLVCJdVCgSCCVD:gcgdscgcxczcx

 

 

OH MY GOD DUDE ADMIT YOU'RE WRONG. THEY PUT THE BRAWL ROOSTER THERE BECAUSE THEY LIKE SAID CHARACTERS.

IF THEY CARED ABOUT FANS, JIGGLY WOULDN'T BE THERE, YOUNG LINK WOULD'VE STAYED, ROY WOULD'VE STAYED etc.

 

THINK FOR ONE MINUTE.

 

/karkat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...