Master of Chaos™ Posted June 5, 2010 Report Share Posted June 5, 2010 Seriously read the first Post the Card you made needs to have the same Attribute, Level and Type, and either its ATK or DEF needs to be the same as Mammoth Graveyard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coaster Guy Posted June 5, 2010 Report Share Posted June 5, 2010 All 3' date=' accepted, Frax, thanks. At Wolf & Stonec, you're breaking an IMPORTANT rule.[/quote'] I said Mountainous Mammoth Graveyard to be chosen.And also, why did you ask me to pick any 1 of the 2 if you knew the fusion mammoth graveyard monster was against the rules? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baragon Posted June 5, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 5, 2010 That's not what I'm talking about. There's ANOTHER rule you're breaking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coaster Guy Posted June 5, 2010 Report Share Posted June 5, 2010 That's not what I'm talking about. There's ANOTHER rule you're breaking. Thanks' date=' now I know, here is the revised version: [img']http://img683.imageshack.us/img683/4620/451864bz.jpg[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master of Chaos™ Posted June 6, 2010 Report Share Posted June 6, 2010 God damnit Stonec you are still breaking a very Important rule.Either the ATK or the DEF should be the same as Mammoth Graveyard.That is what you need to change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wexfordlad1 Posted June 6, 2010 Report Share Posted June 6, 2010 I have never won a contest. Heres my entry. Hope you like Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baragon Posted June 6, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 6, 2010 Accepted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coaster Guy Posted June 6, 2010 Report Share Posted June 6, 2010 God damnit Stonec you are still breaking a very Important rule.Either the ATK or the DEF should be the same as Mammoth Graveyard.That is what you need to change. I edited it, sorry I must've skipped that part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master of Chaos™ Posted June 6, 2010 Report Share Posted June 6, 2010 Its okay i just wanted to tell you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam1999 1999 Posted June 6, 2010 Report Share Posted June 6, 2010 hope this gets in :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycholera Posted June 7, 2010 Report Share Posted June 7, 2010 You're breaking at least one rule. END DATE TODAY! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommers2008 Posted June 7, 2010 Report Share Posted June 7, 2010 Yes we should no who won soon enough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baragon Posted June 7, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 7, 2010 I have finished the judging. However, I have yet to receive Evergreen's judging, and will wait until he pm's me the scores. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycholera Posted June 7, 2010 Report Share Posted June 7, 2010 Can't you post yours so we can see how we're doing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insert_Name_Here Posted June 7, 2010 Report Share Posted June 7, 2010 10 bucks says i Lost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baragon Posted June 7, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 7, 2010 Not the final scores. Scores are subject to change. [spoiler=BDB vi Britannia:] No OCG errors, followed the rules. Useful in a Dinosaur deck, I suppose, but how useful are those anyway?7.4/10 [spoiler=yugioh designer:] A card that involves the use of Juraks? Interesting, although it doesn't follow their regime. Some OCG errors, like "graveyard". The picture is a bit... distorted (wasn't resized properly). The effect is interesting, but doesn't really apply to Juraks, which would be the only way to Summon it to begin with.5.9/10 [spoiler=Space Ranger Gold:] Followed all rules, no OCG errors. Reminds me of a poisonous "Iron Chain Snake", and for once, the name fits the effect. 8.4/10 [spoiler=Mr. XYZ:] No OCG errors. This card seems a bit OP'd, considering that if you have, say, 5 Dinosaurs in your graveyard, this thing passes 3000 DEF points. The second effect seems almost useless in the current meta.7.8/10 [spoiler=~ P O L A R I S ~:] No OCG errors. Breaks the steriotype that "Dinosaurs are only useful in a Dinosaur deck." Not only that, but it's a Tuner; making it useful in today's meta (f*** off, Juraks.) 8.9/10 [spoiler=Yae:] The image seems to be resized improperly; perhaps it's just me. Not loving the effect; although it's meant to work with Dinosaurs, it's essentually a less-beefed up version of Honest, and you can end up hurting yourself with it. Although there are probably some bait-and-trap strategies you can pull off with it, I just can't see it.7.8/10 [spoiler=TechnoDoomedOne:] This is pretty simple, but effective. I also happen to enjoy the pic you used. Not exactly one for the record books, but certaintly a useful card in any case.8.5/10 [spoiler=Sound Pulse:] This has an error at the bottom, although you probably didn't notice. "2010 1996", which means you broke a major rule, thus -5. This card also implies that you'd be frequently using the standard "Mammoth Graveyard" which is far fetched, and the life-gaining effect is barely worth it.2/10 [spoiler=tommers2008:] Liking this card alot. Reminds me of some trap, the name of which I cannot recall at this very moment. Anyway, all rules followed, works well with Dinosaurs.8.8/10 [spoiler=Skyson:] Interesting. Although the first parts of the effect are hardly useful, the last part fits the original description of the card well.8.5/10 [spoiler=Psycholera:] A Spirit monster? Haven't seen one of those in ages. Anyway, fits Dinosaurs well. So essentually it's 2000 ATK Lvl 3 monster? Perhaps tone that down a bit. Anyway, everything else is great.8.9/10 [spoiler=ajw133994:] Terrible quality image, terrible OCG, no usesummoning two 1200 ATK normal monsters.4/10 [spoiler=Light Master XX:] So it's supposed to work with Mammoth Graveyard, instead of just fixing up the original? Liking the effect, and it DOES do the required thing of making MG useful, however with this card and the original, that surmounts to a maximum of 6 cards, which still limits this effect drastically.8.7/10 [spoiler=DX DX USER:] So it's a dinosaur...that works with Zombies? SPECIFIC ZOMBIES? Not exactly the most versatile card in the book, but it has it's uses, I suppose.8/10 [spoiler=stonecphillips:] Bad pic, OCG errors are plenty. However, it does work well with Dinosaurs, as they are essentually beatsticks and you'll probably have several equip cards, making the effect a bit more useful.6/10 [spoiler=Frex:] Cool, a loop-based monster. Fits the name "Graveyard". Useful for Tribute Fodder, obviously, among other things. Liking the idea behind "Inferno Reckless Summon", and I can see it being combo'd with various other things.8.7/10 [spoiler=Vediavis:] So, a maximum of 2200 ATK? That's it? I know Dinosaurs are beatsticks, but this is barely worth it.5/10 [spoiler=Father Wolf:] Broke several rules. -5. The effect is perfect, though...you would've got a 10/10 if not for this. I can think of a thousand uses for this.5/10. [spoiler=wexfordlad1:] OCG errors, bland pic and background. Effect fits the name, at least, and it's useful as Tribute fodder. I'm not really an expert on Machines, though, so I can't comment on how it'd effect that.7/10 [spoiler=adam1999 1999:] -5 for breaking rules. Tons of OCG errors, useless effect, since it's in the opponent's Standby Phase. 2/10 Evergreen's Ratings:[spoiler=BDB vi Britannia:] 5/10 [spoiler=yugioh designer:]3/10 [spoiler=Space Ranger Gold:] 6/10 [spoiler=Mr. XYZ:]5/10 [spoiler=~ P O L A R I S ~:] 8.9/10 [spoiler=Yae:] 7/10 [spoiler=TechnoDoomedOne:] 6.9/10 [spoiler=Sound Pulse:] 2.4/10 [spoiler=tommers2008:] 8.8/10 [spoiler=Skyson:]8/10 [spoiler=Psycholera:] 7/10 [spoiler=ajw133994:] 2/10 [spoiler=Light Master XX:]7/10 [spoiler=DX DX USER:]6/10 [spoiler=stonecphillips:] 5.3/10 [spoiler=Frex:]8.9/10 [spoiler=Vediavis:] 4.8/10 [spoiler=Father Wolf:] 6/10. [spoiler=wexfordlad1:] 6.7/10 [spoiler=adam1999 1999:] 1.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master of Chaos™ Posted June 7, 2010 Report Share Posted June 7, 2010 Okay so you are yet to receive the scores from Evergreen which will actually decide who wins.Nice i like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycholera Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 Joint 1st? Epic! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master of Chaos™ Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 Actually you are in a tie with Polaris but still good job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycholera Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 Actually you are in a tie with Polaris but still good job. yes...that's why I said joint first... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master of Chaos™ Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 Sorry didn't see it.Still very impressive.I made it to a tie for the 3nd Place, like 3 people have the same Score as me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycholera Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 Nice one 8) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommers2008 Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 Im 2nd at the moment, but there is a tie for 1st so im 3rd overall as it stands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vediavis Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 my card can have a max of 3700 3 mammoth graveyard and 2 mammoth king of the graveyard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommers2008 Posted June 8, 2010 Report Share Posted June 8, 2010 Sorry if this offends you but, so what. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.