Jump to content

Make "Mammoth Graveyard" useful -OVER-


Baragon

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

All 3' date=' accepted, Frax, thanks.

 

At Wolf & Stonec, you're breaking an IMPORTANT rule.

[/quote']

 

I said Mountainous Mammoth Graveyard to be chosen.

And also, why did you ask me to pick any 1 of the 2 if you knew the fusion mammoth graveyard monster was against the rules?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not the final scores. Scores are subject to change.

[spoiler=BDB vi Britannia:] No OCG errors, followed the rules. Useful in a Dinosaur deck, I suppose, but how useful are those anyway?

7.4/10

 

 

[spoiler=yugioh designer:] A card that involves the use of Juraks? Interesting, although it doesn't follow their regime. Some OCG errors, like "graveyard". The picture is a bit... distorted (wasn't resized properly). The effect is interesting, but doesn't really apply to Juraks, which would be the only way to Summon it to begin with.

5.9/10

 

 

[spoiler=Space Ranger Gold:] Followed all rules, no OCG errors. Reminds me of a poisonous "Iron Chain Snake", and for once, the name fits the effect.

8.4/10

 

 

[spoiler=Mr. XYZ:] No OCG errors. This card seems a bit OP'd, considering that if you have, say, 5 Dinosaurs in your graveyard, this thing passes 3000 DEF points. The second effect seems almost useless in the current meta.

7.8/10

 

 

[spoiler=~ P O L A R I S ~:] No OCG errors. Breaks the steriotype that "Dinosaurs are only useful in a Dinosaur deck." Not only that, but it's a Tuner; making it useful in today's meta (f*** off, Juraks.)

8.9/10

 

 

[spoiler=Yae:] The image seems to be resized improperly; perhaps it's just me. Not loving the effect; although it's meant to work with Dinosaurs, it's essentually a less-beefed up version of Honest, and you can end up hurting yourself with it. Although there are probably some bait-and-trap strategies you can pull off with it, I just can't see it.

7.8/10

 

 

[spoiler=TechnoDoomedOne:] This is pretty simple, but effective. I also happen to enjoy the pic you used. Not exactly one for the record books, but certaintly a useful card in any case.

8.5/10

 

 

[spoiler=Sound Pulse:] This has an error at the bottom, although you probably didn't notice. "2010 1996", which means you broke a major rule, thus -5. This card also implies that you'd be frequently using the standard "Mammoth Graveyard" which is far fetched, and the life-gaining effect is barely worth it.

2/10

 

 

[spoiler=tommers2008:] Liking this card alot. Reminds me of some trap, the name of which I cannot recall at this very moment. Anyway, all rules followed, works well with Dinosaurs.

8.8/10

 

 

[spoiler=Skyson:] Interesting. Although the first parts of the effect are hardly useful, the last part fits the original description of the card well.

8.5/10

 

 

[spoiler=Psycholera:] A Spirit monster? Haven't seen one of those in ages. Anyway, fits Dinosaurs well. So essentually it's 2000 ATK Lvl 3 monster? Perhaps tone that down a bit. Anyway, everything else is great.

8.9/10

 

 

[spoiler=ajw133994:] Terrible quality image, terrible OCG, no use

summoning two 1200 ATK normal monsters.

4/10

 

 

[spoiler=Light Master XX:] So it's supposed to work with Mammoth Graveyard, instead of just fixing up the original? Liking the effect, and it DOES do the required thing of making MG useful, however with this card and the original, that surmounts to a maximum of 6 cards, which still limits this effect drastically.

8.7/10

 

 

[spoiler=DX DX USER:] So it's a dinosaur...that works with Zombies? SPECIFIC ZOMBIES? Not exactly the most versatile card in the book, but it has it's uses, I suppose.

8/10

 

 

[spoiler=stonecphillips:] Bad pic, OCG errors are plenty. However, it does work well with Dinosaurs, as they are essentually beatsticks and you'll probably have several equip cards, making the effect a bit more useful.

6/10

 

 

[spoiler=Frex:] Cool, a loop-based monster. Fits the name "Graveyard". Useful for Tribute Fodder, obviously, among other things. Liking the idea behind "Inferno Reckless Summon", and I can see it being combo'd with various other things.

8.7/10

 

 

[spoiler=Vediavis:] So, a maximum of 2200 ATK? That's it? I know Dinosaurs are beatsticks, but this is barely worth it.

5/10

 

 

[spoiler=Father Wolf:] Broke several rules. -5. The effect is perfect, though...you would've got a 10/10 if not for this. I can think of a thousand uses for this.

5/10.

 

 

[spoiler=wexfordlad1:] OCG errors, bland pic and background. Effect fits the name, at least, and it's useful as Tribute fodder. I'm not really an expert on Machines, though, so I can't comment

on how it'd effect that.

7/10

 

 

[spoiler=adam1999 1999:] -5 for breaking rules. Tons of OCG errors, useless effect, since it's in the opponent's Standby Phase.

2/10

 

 

Evergreen's Ratings:

[spoiler=BDB vi Britannia:]

5/10

 

 

[spoiler=yugioh designer:]

3/10

 

 

[spoiler=Space Ranger Gold:]

6/10

 

 

[spoiler=Mr. XYZ:]

5/10

 

 

[spoiler=~ P O L A R I S ~:]

8.9/10

 

 

[spoiler=Yae:]

7/10

 

 

[spoiler=TechnoDoomedOne:]

6.9/10

 

 

[spoiler=Sound Pulse:]

2.4/10

 

 

[spoiler=tommers2008:]

8.8/10

 

 

[spoiler=Skyson:]

8/10

 

 

[spoiler=Psycholera:]

7/10

 

 

[spoiler=ajw133994:]

2/10

 

 

[spoiler=Light Master XX:]

7/10

 

 

[spoiler=DX DX USER:]

6/10

 

 

[spoiler=stonecphillips:]

5.3/10

 

 

[spoiler=Frex:]

8.9/10

 

 

[spoiler=Vediavis:]

4.8/10

 

 

[spoiler=Father Wolf:]

6/10.

 

 

[spoiler=wexfordlad1:]

6.7/10

 

 

[spoiler=adam1999 1999:]

1.9/10

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...