Tronta Posted June 7, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 7, 2010 i've tested it a bit and it's sexy. its just a random +0 i throw in. and it can also be used offensively with my books. book of moon->chain guard penalty on any card on the field is a -1 that switches someone to facedown defense. i am happy for this. so far i only got owned hard by an rfg deck. duh. and i think i lost to something else that was just a bad draw. 3 shallow graves in a row. wtf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JadenxAtemYAOI Posted June 7, 2010 Report Share Posted June 7, 2010 You could try the old SORL + needle worm + penguin soldier. Flip needle worm, flip penguin soldier bring the two card back then re set them and repeat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted June 7, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 7, 2010 oh god. problems with what you just said:first, swords doesn't flip my monsters.second, that's like a -1 to field advantage, -3 when they heavy it.third, i cant set them both immediately.foruth, how can i repeat when swords is limited?fifth, stop it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted July 8, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 8, 2010 SUPER BUMP so after like, 2 months, i'm ready to use this thing again. i was wondering though:i would like to find room for a 3rd moon, night assailant and a feather of the phoenix. but i dont want to run 43.i'd like to go as high as 42, preferably 41.thoughts ycm? edit:i dont know i should run 2 guards... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimson Phantom Posted July 9, 2010 Report Share Posted July 9, 2010 - Guards They're not good imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted July 9, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 9, 2010 i need to test them a little more extensively, to be honest. it's just hard to find room for everything. i feel like they can be useful if i find the right numbers, perhaps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Doodle Posted July 9, 2010 Report Share Posted July 9, 2010 :P I was dueling agains this?(yesterday,i was skilless village)but I didnt understand somthing, why volcanic shell? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted July 9, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 9, 2010 yea.. village.. really fucks me up. shell is actually sweet tech. there's a lot of -1's in this deck. hand dest, card dest, phoenix, etc. running shell effectively negates those -1's. they also ensure that i'll always have a monster to summon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
狐の気 Posted July 15, 2010 Report Share Posted July 15, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Michael Geren Posted July 16, 2010 Report Share Posted July 16, 2010 That would be a good side tech if this were a meta deck, but that is a necrobamp, my friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SephirothKirby Posted July 16, 2010 Report Share Posted July 16, 2010 Tronta is the reason I always side deck 1 Penguin Knight. I have never had to side it in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JadenxAtemYAOI Posted July 16, 2010 Report Share Posted July 16, 2010 I remember telling someone about that. It's a generic fiber jar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El-Rrey Posted July 16, 2010 Report Share Posted July 16, 2010 I remember telling someone about that. It's a generic fiber jar. The ones to play this could only use it's effct against Vampire decks but no one play them!!This makes this card bad!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.