Jump to content

My bro loves gadgets. LOL jk he thinks they suck.


.Leo

Recommended Posts

Me: So Gadgets won YCS.

Bro: But they suck!

Me: Why do they suck?

Bro: Because they just do.

Me: But, they beat Infernity and X-Sabers, so they are pretty good.

Bro: Who cares if they beat Infernities?

Me: lol.

Bro: It is just Infernities, what is the big deal?

Me: Infernities are 2 Words. OTK Machine.

 

So my little arguement made me make this deck :3. I looked at some of the builds from YCS and came up with this idea. I'm think about teching a Gold Sarc or maybe a RftDD. Any suggestions?

 

Monsters -16-:

Green Gadget [2]

Red Gadget [2]

Yellow Gadget [2]

Doomcaliber Knight [2]

D.D. Crow [2]

Thunder King Rai-Oh [2]

Tragoedia [1]

Sangan [1]

Plaguespreader Zombie [1]

Dark Armed Dragon [1]

 

Spell Cards -14-:

Smashing Ground [3]

Fissure [3]

Hand Destruction [2]

Pot of Avarice [2]

Gold Sarc [1]

Heavy Storm [1]

Burial from a Different Dimension [1]

Brain Control [1]

 

Trap Cards -10-:

Dimensional Prison [3]

Royal Oppresion [2]

Bottomless Trap Hole [2]

Mirror Force [1]

Call of the Haunted [1]

Torrential Tribute [1]

 

Extra Deck -15-:

Stardust Dragon [2]

Red Dragon Archfiend [2]

Mist Wurm [2]

Ally of Justice Catastor [2]

Flamvell Uruquizas [2]

Black Rose Dragon [1]

Goyo Guardian [1]

Brionac [1]

Chimertech Overdragon [1]

Chimertech Fortress Dragon [1]

 

Side Deck -15-:

Cyber Dragons [2]

D.D. Warrior Lady [2]

Breaker the Magical Warrior [1]

Neo-Spacian Grand Mole [1]

Overload Fusion [1]

Future Fusion [1]

Need Help [7]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dd warrior lady

breaker the magical warrior' date=' and

neo-spacian grand mole

would all help if u can work them in

idk wut to neg

[/quote']

 

D.D. Warrior Lady: I will side her at 2.

Breaker the Magical Warrior: Sure, side at 1.

Grand Mole: Side at 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this is the anti-meta version of Gadgets' date=' you need to run 1/9th Gadgets (6 Gadgets total). Only non-control, aggresive versions of Gadget run 9x Gadget, or atleast this is what I've heard from the Gadget expert of the site...

[/quote']

 

I find the need for 9 Gadgets. I can usually keep a field with at least 1 Gadget consistantly.

 

I might take them out, what for though?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...