Crapilisious

[KageKatana]

Latest tag... keep in mind i havent made a tag in like 6 weeks at least.

 

 

Cnc please tell me how to improve

[Madsen]

Except for text, really smexy tbh.

[KageKatana]

thanks ill get rid of the text

[Dranzer]

Nice,but the text looks realy random.

[Guest JoshIcy]

Nice? lol no.

 

The blue is the blur spots that are horribly distorted. You didn't use a hard shape or soft transition to do it. Nor do I see any hint of water, meaning that all you did was splash on the blur for some cheap and horribly ineffective depth. Why you did that, I've got no idea. Even a preschooler would go "Mommy thats nasty".

Red is the shape and directionality of your Focal/Render. It's naturally tilted, but in a manner that is far from dynamic or appealing, outside a portrait style image. To which this is not. Your positioning is terrible, just dead center with no formal appeal or sense of direction? Why...?

The Orange is your Light Source. It's distorted, shaped like a K, and for some reason shatter-shots all over the image. I get that the whole signature is light as it is, but why even bother with a Light "source" if it's going to overhighlight and do something terrible to it? x.x"

 

And then you have these faded objects that are in the same draw distance as the rest, it only hurts the eyes from looking at it.

 

Except for text' date=' really smexy tbh.

[/quote']

Shut up, even for 6 weeks. All I pointed out was the raw basics. He could have taken a picture of Water on Paper, called it art and it would have scored more.

[chairman ali]

Icyblue summed it up.

 

Although, your focal placement isn't acceptable for it is not hitting any power points. Your colours are bland as well as the concept. You're also off on the lighting transition.

[Catman25]

Icy man, you could've been nicer about it. =/ People are more willing to take cnc if it is positive.

 

 

Being not too much of a cncer, I can't help you out much. The only thing that caught my eye right away was the placement of the text. Distracts a bit from the main focal point.

[Twenty-five Zero Oh-oh]

This thread feels ironic.

[KageKatana]

Nice? lol no.

 

The blue is the blur spots that are horribly distorted. You didn't use a hard shape or soft transition to do it. Nor do I see any hint of water' date=' meaning that all you did was splash on the blur for some cheap and horribly ineffective depth. Why you did that, I've got no idea. Even a preschooler would go "Mommy thats nasty".[/color']

Red is the shape and directionality of your Focal/Render. It's naturally tilted, but in a manner that is far from dynamic or appealing, outside a portrait style image. To which this is not. Your positioning is terrible, just dead center with no formal appeal or sense of direction? Why...?

The Orange is your Light Source. It's distorted, shaped like a K, and for some reason shatter-shots all over the image. I get that the whole signature is light as it is, but why even bother with a Light "source" if it's going to overhighlight and do something terrible to it? x.x"

 

And then you have these faded objects that are in the same draw distance as the rest, it only hurts the eyes from looking at it.

 

Except for text' date=' really smexy tbh.

[/quote']

Shut up, even for 6 weeks. All I pointed out was the raw basics. He could have taken a picture of Water on Paper, called it art and it would have scored more.

 

Thanks, quite helpful. its really not mean its the truth so again thanks