Brinolovania Posted April 27, 2010 Report Share Posted April 27, 2010 I totally support this one...and I give you rep for thinking of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrickyPooBoy Posted April 27, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 27, 2010 Gee, thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Hollow Posted April 28, 2010 Report Share Posted April 28, 2010 BUMP for the shake of Crismon ^^^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KuroKibo Posted April 28, 2010 Report Share Posted April 28, 2010 At first glance, I want to support this. But then, you said it was 'users', not 'specific users'. No. In theory, what comes at my mind is, if you said 'users can lock threads', then ANYONE could lock the thread, and that would've been a disaster. And I don't think there's a way to choose who can lock the thread. Why I don't support this is because, by ANYONE, I meant ANYONE including noobs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sp1at Posted April 28, 2010 Report Share Posted April 28, 2010 I support. Except I think we should have to pay some points to the mod of that forum. I mean points are pretty useless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Hollow Posted April 28, 2010 Report Share Posted April 28, 2010 Nope Crismon added: PPl with 2(or was it 3?) or more starts can do that -.-Also, points are not useless if you use them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted April 28, 2010 Report Share Posted April 28, 2010 At first glance' date=' I want to support this. But then, you said it was 'users', not 'specific users'. No. In theory, what comes at my mind is, if you said 'users can lock threads', then ANYONE could lock the thread, and that would've been a disaster. And I don't think there's a way to choose who can lock the thread. Why I don't support this is because, by ANYONE, I meant ANYONE including noobs.[/quote'] No, he meant that you will be able to lock only your own threads, not threads of other people Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrickyPooBoy Posted April 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 28, 2010 At first glance' date=' I want to support this. But then, you said it was 'users', not 'specific users'. No. In theory, what comes at my mind is, if you said 'users can lock threads', then ANYONE could lock the thread, and that would've been a disaster. And I don't think there's a way to choose who can lock the thread. Why I don't support this is because, by ANYONE, I meant ANYONE including noobs.[/quote']I meant users of their own threads can lock it. Read the freakin post -_- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Night Posted April 28, 2010 Report Share Posted April 28, 2010 At first glance' date=' I want to support this. But then, you said it was 'users', not 'specific users'. No. In theory, what comes at my mind is, if you said 'users can lock threads', then ANYONE could lock the thread, and that would've been a disaster. And I don't think there's a way to choose who can lock the thread. Why I don't support this is because, by ANYONE, I meant ANYONE including noobs.[/quote'] Lmao really? Wow fail, that doesnt even make sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donquixote Doflamingo Posted April 28, 2010 Report Share Posted April 28, 2010 I support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted April 28, 2010 Report Share Posted April 28, 2010 I support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrickyPooBoy Posted April 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 28, 2010 Thanks everyone! Should I send this to YCMaker, or will he ignore it? (as always) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donquixote Doflamingo Posted April 28, 2010 Report Share Posted April 28, 2010 Thanks everyone! Should I send this to YCMaker' date=' or will he ignore it? (as always)[/quote'] Maybe. He doesn't usually answer any PMs at all, but its worth a try. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrickyPooBoy Posted April 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 28, 2010 Done. Let's just wiat. I mean wait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donquixote Doflamingo Posted April 28, 2010 Report Share Posted April 28, 2010 Done. Let's just wiat. I mean wait. I must say though, its a great idea. Just incase YCMaker doesn't reply, try Falling Pizza Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrickyPooBoy Posted April 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 28, 2010 Good idae. I mean idea. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shradow Posted April 28, 2010 Report Share Posted April 28, 2010 Support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted April 29, 2010 Report Share Posted April 29, 2010 I dont really see any HARM in it, which is reason enough to support it when I'm primarily neutral. I imagine that if someone starts making "spam threads" where they make a topic, lock it, and so on, that person would get banned or penalized in the same way they would if they made multiple threads and DIDNT lock it. I don't like the idea of being able to "un-lock" your own thread even if you yourself locked it. That could lead to some mild "power-abuse" where people, wanting to be funny, locks their thread during X hours and unlocks it at random times to troll people who might post there. I also question whether that can be used to get around a MOD locking the thread and the owner unlocking it. So if such an idea of self-lock was implemented, I think locking it "by accident", even, would require contacting a mod to unlock it. And I'm pretty sure mods would notice being pestered by the same person too often to unlock their thread after "accidently" locking it, and will either refuse to do it or penalize the user, so that reduces the amount of random locks. As for users who'll lock their thread after negative criticism...you mean the ones who go into flame-arguments when someone says their deck sucks and eventually the thread gets locked anyway because it devolves into two or three people insulting each other while spectators pick sides and predict how long until a mod locks it (all while making comments about post counts going up)? Dang, sure would hate for those sensitive souls to deprive us of making fun of their deck while they throw tantrums about how stupid we are for hating their deck. Overall, I think it's a good idea, and although not strictly necessary, I support the idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrickyPooBoy Posted April 29, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 29, 2010 I never said you could unlock your own threads... Then, when a thread could be locked for a perfectly fine reason, people would just unlock it. I didn't mean that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Altaïr Posted April 29, 2010 Report Share Posted April 29, 2010 i support its a great idea! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nɇvɇrmorɇ Posted April 29, 2010 Report Share Posted April 29, 2010 I hereby support this! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrickyPooBoy Posted April 29, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 29, 2010 Thnaks! I mean Thanks! I hope it gets around... FALLING PIZZA RESPONDED TO MY MESSAGE. HE ASKED FOR THE LINK AGAIN, WHICH MUST MEAN HE WILL BE HERE SOON. I GAVE HIM THE NEW LINK WHICH WORKS FINE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smear Posted April 29, 2010 Report Share Posted April 29, 2010 Definitely support. Awesome idae. ;D I mean idea. xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrickyPooBoy Posted April 29, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 29, 2010 Thanks Smeargle! :D Smear it on all walls you see![/cornyjoke] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xing Posted April 29, 2010 Report Share Posted April 29, 2010 Why. The. funk. Not.I hope you know that means support Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.