Twenty-five Zero Oh-oh Posted April 18, 2010 Report Share Posted April 18, 2010 Some new tags. Chaster, did I do the colors okay this time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chairman ali Posted April 18, 2010 Report Share Posted April 18, 2010 2nd one has a great colour scheme but the focal is LQ. First is really bad in every-way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EHN. Posted April 18, 2010 Report Share Posted April 18, 2010 First has bad transition. Second one is just on the verge of mono. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Night Posted April 18, 2010 Report Share Posted April 18, 2010 Pretty much what ken said. Except the worst part of the first is the smudging. 2nd looks depthy and flowfull. But thats my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'tyleR Posted April 18, 2010 Report Share Posted April 18, 2010 Second seems overblurred, LQ, and has little depth. Do a few touch-ups and some wow factor and it could be cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/성成현賢/.led Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 I really hate LONG FOCALS your smudging sucks =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twenty-five Zero Oh-oh Posted April 19, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 Thanks for the replies. Marth sig taken down due to extreme failness. And the second isn't on the verge of mono. .Led: If you're talking about the smudging on the Marth sig, I understand. Probably the most fail smudging I've done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/성成현賢/.led Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 on both... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.