Nexev Posted April 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 Ignore them. See I found a secret that can change the world. On the upper righ hand corner of the window you are reading this on. There is a button with an arrow. If you push the button then you go away from the page you were on. It's like you can not pay attention to things that bug you! INGENIOUS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted April 17, 2010 Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 Somehow or other, I knew SOMEONE was gonna be a smartass about that. I meant, shouldn't we try and stop types like dog? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nexev Posted April 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 Why? Point out they are bad. It's physically impossible to attack a concept. Otherwise slavery would have ended ages ago when someone said it was annoying. If someone likes it they'll do it. Trying to cap it would make Dog the signature type of a card made by a troll. Which would make them a minor meme, thus immortalizing them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehmani Posted April 17, 2010 Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 Rule 34 guys' date=' if it exist, there is porn of it. Moving on, 4chan, you are already scarred thinking in a Porned version of Summoned Skull, or you are having dirty thoughts in a Female Summoned Skull porn, Thanks to Rule 63, it there is always a female version of a male character.[/quote'] Who said anything about it being female? xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deustodo Posted April 17, 2010 Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 I'm not talking to you, Alf. About the Dog type discussion, dog would be replaced by beast, because its a beast, humans are beast as well, but they have guns, so we call them warrior, and if a beast that is not a human has guns, we call them Beast-Warrior. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enrise Posted April 17, 2010 Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 I don't think my application has been noticed: I'll admit' date=' Fake-Type are somethings that I usually don't want to see, mainly cause of the reason that there is no entire thought based around it, because from what I saw from 'noob' Fake Types, they are based on a picture than an effect.But however, I'll respect that Fake-Types can be made, and such. I just wish to see more thought put into the Fake-Types that they create.But I'll go ahead and join. Name: EnriseCard maker or Debater: I can take the job of Card Maker, up to both. But because of what I said above, I don't really know about that.Why you decided to join: Well, I think I said that in the above. Honestly, I said most of my app before the app itself. Whether this means I'm accepted or not completely is up to you.[/quote'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nexev Posted April 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 Okay then you should be Cardmaker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enrise Posted April 17, 2010 Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 Okay then you should be Cardmaker. Okay. I plan on making something within the next hour or so.I just need some help on a Type that isn't covered by all the original 22-Types. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nexev Posted April 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 If you do then your better than Konami. Sea Sepernt is covered by Aqua, Fish, reptile Dragon= Winged Beast, Reptile, Pyro Fish=Aqua Psychic=Spellcastor. Dinosaur=reptile See my point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted April 17, 2010 Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 Alchemist, Inventor, Humanoid? Those are the 3 best types, probably. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nexev Posted April 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 Alchemist and inventor are the same thing! If you have one you can't have another. They are as alike as Fish and Sea Seperant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enrise Posted April 17, 2010 Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 If you do then your better than Konami. Sea Sepernt is covered by Aqua' date=' Fish, reptile Dragon= Winged Beast, Reptile, Pyro Fish=Aqua Psychic=Spellcastor. Dinosaur=reptile See my point?[/quote'] I mean what isn't covered by them. I know there are some things, but getting them is the hard part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nexev Posted April 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 PRobbaly Humanoid. They don't fight often and have normal jobs. Civillians to be frank. But they can work as medics and builders and scientists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted April 17, 2010 Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 Alchemist and inventor are the same thing! If you have one you can't have another. They are as alike as Fish and Sea Seperant. Nope. Alchemists use existing elements to create compounds. Inventors do something slightly similar, but not equal, and definitely not with chemicals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deustodo Posted April 17, 2010 Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 If Konami can put Sea Serpent, Aqua, and Fish as different Types, I don't see why I couldn't make a Human-Type. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nexev Posted April 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 PRove it. Name one thing a person can make that doesn't use chemicals. ONE THING. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deustodo Posted April 17, 2010 Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 A moonwalk. Nuff said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nexev Posted April 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 That is a technique, you don't make it, you do it. Thus it doesn't count for something an inventor can do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deustodo Posted April 17, 2010 Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 Also, I can make an origami without any chemical. So I think its valid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted April 17, 2010 Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 That is a technique' date=' you don't make it, you do it. Thus it doesn't count for something an inventor can do.[/quote'] An inventor uses chemicals, cause everything is made of chemicals, but he doesn't mix them like alchemists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nexev Posted April 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 Right, that TOTALLY COUNTS. ESPECIALLY BECAUSE YOU SAID THEY DIDN"T EARLIER. HOW SILLY OF ME. >.> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sploda Posted April 17, 2010 Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 Inventors specilaize in constructing things with tools and metals. Alchemists use Chemicals to create poitions and the like. Connection: They make things Not good enough to put them together, although since Spellcasters include potions and stuff I don't think Alchemist is necessary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deustodo Posted April 17, 2010 Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 Still, you didn't make any new Inventor monsters, did you creator? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sploda Posted April 18, 2010 Report Share Posted April 18, 2010 None recently, but then again I haven't made any cards recently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deustodo Posted April 18, 2010 Report Share Posted April 18, 2010 That is not an excuse, if you want your Type need to be respected, or whatever you want to do with it, you need to post at least a new example of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.