Fake Type Abolitionists.

[Deustodo]

Name: Deustodo

Card maker or Debater: Card Maker

Why you decided to join: Nothing better to do.

[Nexev]

Nerd: Clever, there are cards that use effects similar for that but this seems to be a much easier way to do it, and very abusable.

 

Deus: I have to point this out. Deustood=/=Deustodo. You couldn't spell your name right. ^.^

 

 

Your accepted.

[Corvidae]

Exactly. Just give monsters multiple types. It makes cards that work for specific types finally useful. Lava Golem, that really old card, could Rock / Pyro or something. Stuff like that, that'd make it way easier to fit cards into types.

[Nexev]

It lets cards fit multiple supports.

 

More importantly if their are duel types then Chaos would likely get some support.

 

 

Lava Golem wasn't type specific but you can take advantage of cards like insect queen easier.

 

It also would make Fairy King Truesdale (wait that's a Plant? BS)...

 

It would allow for more in between type support, alliances and such. Makes for an interestinger game.

[Corvidae]

Thank you.

And I'm just saying Lava golem is still deserves to be a rock type.

Fairy King Truesdale should be Fairy / Plant

And it would make things much more interesting...

[Guest JoshIcy]

In addition to fake types' date=' how about double types?

 

[img']http://img710.imageshack.us/img710/9541/300934.jpg[/img]

 

Note: I know it uses real types, but it has TWO real types.

 

Umm... You can solve that with a slight word twist actually. Like call the type "Dracostone" or whatever (not so creative right now). And word it as; This card is treated as a Dragon-Type and Rock-Type monster in addition to its normal Type. You would effectively gain a 3 Typed card while maintaining that whole separation issue and a sense of fake-typeness.

[Corvidae]

true...

[Nexev]

That would cause an implosion of new types.

 

Let's see here, assuming triplels aren't created, your plan would involve... 484 new types.

 

I think just having a card have two types would be allot easier.

[Corvidae]

I count 441 new types...

[Nexev]

With Obelisk being a legal card through a promo release, one is forced to include Divine Beast into the list of new types.

[Alexis Rhodes]

Name:Yu-Gi-Oh 5D'S

Card maker or Debater:

Why you decided to join:Can i join to argue against fake types ?

[DL]

Name: Darklink401

Card maker or Debater: both

Why you decided to join:

1. Chase made a general call in the Vampire Club

2. I like discussing fake types

[Corvidae]

@Nexey: It's LEGAL!?!?!

 

ok then, 484. I didn't know it was actually legal

[Nexev]

Well you can't argue against them.

 

I intend to make debate threads to allow this later however.

 

Once I make one I'll send a pm.

 

In addition I might make a Real Type sub section.

 

@DArklink: All sense of logic demands I deny you, however considering Icy is far from light handed in dispensing justice, he'd probably reverse any plan you try to make to lock it or simply lock it before you do.

 

So accepted.

 

@Nerd: Hard to believe I know.

[Alexis Rhodes]

So can i post ?

[Nexev]

Certainly.

 

I'll actually make the Anti fake type side (which would be composed entirely of debators) and make you the temperary leader as well.

[Alexis Rhodes]

Thanks :)

 

Since there is only me i will not post if your discussing about a fake type or something

[Enma Kozato]

At the topic of double types. My point of view on this would either be as so:Dragon-Rock, or Dragon/Rock with the card being treated as the type not listed in the original. On a second note, acceptable fake types are hard to create and/or find, while finding good sub-types is like looking for a comic in a comic store, so to speak.

[Guest JoshIcy]

That would cause an implosion of new types.

 

Let's see here' date=' assuming triplels aren't created, your plan would involve... 484 new types.

 

I think just having a card have two types would be allot easier.

[/quote']

 

o_O" Not quite... New Types of that nature (assuming you use a Prefix etc nature would be easy to identify). It wouldn't be a problem and they would be classed as a separate kind of card for support.

[Nexev]

But if Dracostone is one type and another type is dracomancer (dragon Spellcaster) you have two extra types.

 

So with all the other types even with the prefix system that is allot of work really.

 

I think Bel and Strategist's idea works better in this case.

[Mehmani]

Double types are unoriginal and pointless. They make already niche demographics (Sea Serpent) an even more niche demographic (Sea Serpent / Dragon? Who's going to run a group that would only contain about 6 cards?).

 

Fake Types should be done PROPERLY and CREATIVELY. Mad Puppet? Meh, too cynical. Soul? That could cover a wide range of cards!

[Deustodo]

Double types are unoriginal and pointless. They make already niche demographics (Sea Serpent) an even more niche demographic (Sea Serpent / Dragon? Who's going to run a group that would only contain about 6 cards?).

 

Fake Types should be done PROPERLY and CREATIVELY. Mad Puppet? Meh' date=' too cynical. Soul? That could cover a wide range of cards!

[/quote']

 

You have a point, but Mad Puppet is my idea, and I made another Fake Type, called Menes. That will not be that easy to be replaced. Anyway, most of my inventions are Fake Sub-Types, or what I like to call, Custom Sub-Types. And yes, I think the idea of double type kinda of silly.

[DL]

Yes, I suppose all logic says "DENY HIM!"

 

But then again, what you say is true.

 

 

Oh, also, since I'm still in the fence about fake types, don't expect me to take the same side over and over on fake types.

[Sploda]

I'm not taking either side but I've still yet to find someone who can replace my Inventor type.

[Nexev]

The purpose of a double type would be that it is affected by both types support.

 

Sortof like Light and DArk Dragon can be affected by LIGHT and DARK support.