Clair Posted April 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 10, 2010 Anytime. >D TTYD was basically a giant, awesome spoof of the original. But SPM has a really awesome story... Shame it wasn't really an RPG. D: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nexev Posted April 10, 2010 Report Share Posted April 10, 2010 But the point is that it's not something new when thier are over 5 games in the same franchise that do the same thing. It ruins the point or paper mario. You can hardly say it was different if the majority of mario games have the same game play. 3D is only usen occasionally and hardly changes game play either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Posted April 10, 2010 Report Share Posted April 10, 2010 I agree with the fact that SPM was not "like" the other two, but look at it this way. Two games were made relatively similar to each other. Does that really define a series? Ehh, not really. Super Mario Bros. 1 and 3 were really similar, but Bros. 2 (the US one, at least) put a new twist on it. It may have sucked (although the remake was smex), but it spun the original idea, still had the same concept that 1 and 3 had, and changed it. Paper Mario and TTYD were based around a good storyline, somewhat based on the battle system, and the fact that you are "paper". Well, other than the battle structure, what really changed in SPM? Not much. You still have a storyline, you still have that paper-like feeling when you aren't in 3D, and it hits you on a nostalgic level in terms of being a side-scroller. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nexev Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 Super Mario Bros two was a different game that they swapped some sprites with. Seriosuly. See"Unlike the majority of other Mario titles, SMB2 was not developed from an independent point; rather it is a redesign of the Japanese Family Computer Disk System game Yume Kōjō: Doki Doki Panic. " Wikipedia. This is Super mario 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Mario_Bros.:_The_Lost_Levels And I was arguing on the fact that SPM wasn't "Trying something different" but instead "switching the formula that caused RPG fans to like it with a platforming fomula" Even though the game's good (I played it), it's fans have perfect right to be pissed, most of them wanted a RPG mario game and that's not what they got. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Headmaster Monokuma Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 What I was saying was that it not being what they want is not a reason to utterly hate it. That is usually the reason most people have for hating it, and their only one. That's what upsets me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nexev Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 Put it this way. You are in a restaurant, you order some spaghetti, your in spaghetti mode, steaks a bit to tough for you to chew. Your waiting, dreaming about how great the pasta will be, you've been here several times and the pasta was always great. The waiter gives you a steak, you can't send it back so you eat it. It's a great steak but still it's not what you wanted. Some people can't play platformers, they just aren't good at them. Allot of those people play RPG. When a rpg becomes a platformer people will be upset, people will hate it for being disappointing as it is not even close to the game they wanted. But it could have been worse. Imagine what would have happened if they made Final Fantasy a platformer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 The Paper Mario series isn't an RPG, in the term's literal sense. It's not a "role playing game". :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nexev Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 Even so, it attracts the same people, so the point still stands Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clair Posted April 11, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 The Paper Mario series isn't an RPG' date=' in the term's literal sense. It's not a "role playing game". :/[/quote'] Care to explain your view? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Godot Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 I would comment on that, but I'm too lazy. Anyways, Super Mario RPG is an RPG, no? (No sheet) Well, I just finished memorizing the rap part of The SMRPG Song. It was so annoying. >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvB-lIcHHPQ&feature=related I have no life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Headmaster Monokuma Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 I'm trying to memorize It's hard because I can't understand all of the lyrics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clair Posted April 11, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 [quote='Ĩ¢ε' pid='4028146' dateline='1270950680'] I would comment on that, but I'm too lazy. Anyways, Super Mario RPG is an RPG, no? (No s***) Well, I just finished memorizing the rap part of The SMRPG Song. It was so annoying. >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvB-lIcHHPQ&feature=related I have no life. [/quote] Duh. There's an RPG song for Mario? Listening~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 The Paper Mario series isn't an RPG' date=' in the term's literal sense. It's not a "role playing game". :/[/quote'] Care to explain your view? What was that game called...? Persona 3, or something. That would be more classified as an RPG, while "RPG" styled Mario games are actually just platformers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clair Posted April 11, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 The Paper Mario series isn't an RPG' date=' in the term's literal sense. It's not a "role playing game". :/[/quote'] Care to explain your view? What was that game called...? Persona 3, or something. That would be more classified as an RPG, while "RPG" styled Mario games are actually just platformers. Paper Mario TTYD was a platformer? You're confusing me. T_T Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Zeonark Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 The Paper Mario series isn't an RPG' date=' in the term's literal sense. It's not a "role playing game". :/[/quote'] Care to explain your view? What was that game called...? Persona 3, or something. That would be more classified as an RPG, while "RPG" styled Mario games are actually just platformers. Persona 3 is half RPG half Dating Sim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 The Paper Mario series isn't an RPG' date=' in the term's literal sense. It's not a "role playing game". :/[/quote'] Care to explain your view? What was that game called...? Persona 3, or something. That would be more classified as an RPG, while "RPG" styled Mario games are actually just platformers. Paper Mario TTYD was a platformer? You're confusing me. T_T Pretty much. I wouldn't classify something like Paper Mario or Super Mario RPG as actually being RPGs. They are more platformer-like, really. There are only a handful of games that are fr srsly RPGs. The Paper Mario series isn't an RPG' date=' in the term's literal sense. It's not a "role playing game". :/[/quote'] Care to explain your view? What was that game called...? Persona 3, or something. That would be more classified as an RPG, while "RPG" styled Mario games are actually just platformers. Persona 3 is half RPG half Dating Sim. Dating Sim? :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nexev Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 Roleplaying characteristics copied from wikipedia. Generally, the player controls a small number of game characters, usually called a party, and achieves victory by completing a series of quests. Players explore a game world, while solving puzzles and engaging in tactical combat. A key feature of the genre is that characters grow in power and abilities, and characters are typically designed by the player. RPGs rarely challenge a player's physical coordination, with the exception of action role-playing games. These games usually have a highly developed story and setting, which is divided into a number of quests. Players control one or several characters by issuing commands, which is performed by the character at an effectiveness determined by that character's numeric attributes. These attributes increase each time a character gains a level, and a character's level goes up each time the player accumulates a certain amount of experience. Paper MArio's Genre: Console role-playing game Basically everyone says they're role playing games but you. So they are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Zeonark Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 Dating Sim? :/ Yes. Throughout the mornings/afternoons of Persona 3' date=' you can go out with friends and such to increase Social Links. With girls, you can have them [s']be your bastards[/s] fall in love with you by increasing the Social Link. Not only that, but Social Links are important for Personas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 Roleplaying characteristics copied from wikipedia. Generally' date=' the player controls a small number of game characters, usually called a party, and achieves victory by completing a series of quests. Players explore a game world, while solving puzzles and engaging in tactical combat. A key feature of the genre is that characters grow in power and abilities, and characters are typically designed by the player. RPGs rarely challenge a player's physical coordination, with the exception of action role-playing games. These games usually have a highly developed story and setting, which is divided into a number of quests. Players control one or several characters by issuing commands, which is performed by the character at an effectiveness determined by that character's numeric attributes. These attributes increase each time a character gains a level, and a character's level goes up each time the player accumulates a certain amount of experience. Paper MArio's Genre: Console role-playing game Basically everyone says they're role playing games but you. So they are.[/quote'] I won't argue with Wikipedia, but I always thought most Mario games were platformers. I never actually checked it on Google, and was simply going off of my thoughts. D: Basically everyone says they're role playing games but you. So they are. Yeah... no. That logic is horrible. If I round up a group of people who support me and say "you will get shot within the next three days", and you are the only one who opposes me, that means you are going to get shot. But that isn't necessarily true. The status quo on an opinion isn't always right, and many times the majority has been proven wrong. :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clair Posted April 11, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 I always thought platformers were "jump to progress through 2-D levels" kind of games. I fail to see where TTYD has any of that. Except when you're jumping through the background. And in Bowser's mid-game lolstages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Zeonark Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 I always thought platformers were "jump to progress through 2-D levels" kind of games. I fail to see where TTYD has any of that. Except when you're jumping through the background. And in Bowser's mid-game lolstages. Bowser's LolStages were the best part of the game. And you know it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 I always thought platformers were "jump to progress through 2-D levels" kind of games. I fail to see where TTYD has any of that. Except when you're jumping through the background. And in Bowser's mid-game lolstages. No, those are side-scrollers. Platformer would be something more like Mario 64 or Galaxy. My mistake, and a big one at that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nexev Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 See the thing is this: What genre a game is, this is defined by people themselves. While group opinion isn't always correct, if multiple people say a game belonged in this group it means the majority of people recognize the game as that type of game. Psychologically this means more than a label. OF course this arguement only applies in certain cases. But RPGs are basifcally games like pre set DnD campaigns but without the dice. Developed plot, expansive world, the chance to do whatever you want (since you can always leave the plot to make Tayce's food and stuff). Even fallout 3 is considered a action rpg. Even though it is also an FPS. It's both. Like Dente's Liquid Ice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clair Posted April 11, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 I always thought platformers were "jump to progress through 2-D levels" kind of games. I fail to see where TTYD has any of that. Except when you're jumping through the background. And in Bowser's mid-game lolstages. Bowser's LolStages were the best part of the game. And you know it. They weren't the worst. Peach's were. Well' date=' the ones without copious amounts of TEC. <3 I always thought platformers were "jump to progress through 2-D levels" kind of games. I fail to see where TTYD has any of that. Except when you're jumping through the background. And in Bowser's mid-game lolstages. No' date=' those are side-scrollers. Platformer would be something more like Mario 64 or Galaxy. My mistake, and a big one at that.[/quote'] I see now. Thanks. And everybody makes mistakes. ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 While group opinion isn't always correct, if multiple people say a game belonged in this group it means the majority of people recognize the game as that type of game. This wasn't a substantial amount of people to create a label, psychological nor physical. If 90% of the video game commnuity recognized Paper Mario as a side scroller, it would be widely accepted, yet not necessarily right. And throughout the video game commnuity, that is what you'd refer to Paper Mario as. In YCM, however, you are representing a small population of the video game community. If 90% of YCMers think Paper Mario is an RPG, it would be widely accepted in terms of the YCM population. That doesn't mean it would have any significant impact on the greater society, nor does it mean the opinion is right. It's just a popular vote. But I agree that Paper Mario is an RPG, the logic you were using to deem it that is wrong, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.