Master White Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 you know this is already a pic of of another card' date=' and the name is the same with the picture??! you get a 1/10 becuase it isn't origianl[/quote'] thats why its called a remake, read the thread title, ok. Darn you ΕεΔδΛλΙιΡρΣσςΕε- you beat me to the punch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psychicplayer Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 srry i was just about to edit that after i looked back at the card. MY BAD! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master White Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 srry i was just about to edit that after i looked back at the card. MY BAD! Its all good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wuu. Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 Once per turn you can select 2 zones that're in the same column and they will be locked for as long as this card is on the field.So, you can lock the field down in 5 turns. The previously locked Zones will be unusable?Seeing its low attack, this card is unusable as well, methinks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 i thought its low attack power was a downside I forgot, low ATK is the reason Disc Commander is balanced and should be @3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRaptor10 Posted March 26, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 Once per turn you can select 2 zones that're in the same column and they will be locked for as long as this card is on the field.So' date=' you can lock the field down in 5 turns. The previously locked Zones will be unusable?Seeing its low attack, this card is unusable as well, methinks.[/quote'] actually in 4 turns, because you can't lock the last zone (the zone that Zone Eater is in) because he will destroy himself. i cant do anything about the attack cuz 250 is his real attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wuu. Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 Hmm. I see.This card would see relatively little playing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 Hmm. I see.This card would see relatively little playing. Monarchs would like a word with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wuu. Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 Hmm. I see.This card would see relatively little playing. Monarchs would like a word with you. Oh noez. You see, i always forget about Monarchs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.