Max Darkness Posted March 23, 2010 Report Share Posted March 23, 2010 I use a Reactor Deck and so was hit when "Dark Strike Fighter" was banned, since the (probably) most useful DARK Machine was written out of the game. Therefore, I present an alternate trump card, with an effect that does the opposite to most, forcing your opponent's monsters into Defense Position when it attacks. Enjoy. Effect: 2 Level 5 or higher DARK Machine-Type monstersThis card can only be Special Summoned from your Extra Deck by sending the above monsters you control to the Graveyard (You do not use “Polymerization” and this Special Summon is treated as a Fusion Summon). When this card is Special Summoned, except by Fusion Summon, you must pay 1500 Life Points. This card inflicts Piercing Damage. If this card destroys a Defense Position monster, any Battle Damage this card inflicts to that card's controller is doubled. When this card attacks, you can switch an Attack Position monster to face-up Defense Position. If this card inflicts 2500 or more Battle Damage to your opponent by its own effect, your opponent discards cards from their hand equal to the number of face-up DARK Machine-Type monsters you control. If this effect activates, destroy this card during the End Phase. Image from Jazin Kay's Archive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted March 24, 2010 Report Share Posted March 24, 2010 very impressive effects as always, there's no OCG errors this time though the effects are too powerful. The fusion monster isn't even hard to summon, just use DNA transplant for the attribute changing therefore, you might want to give it another drawback 9.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MibeR Posted March 24, 2010 Report Share Posted March 24, 2010 This card inflicts Piercing Damage.??i don't have any ting about it?what's for?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shocked Posted March 24, 2010 Report Share Posted March 24, 2010 The pic is awesome.. Very like it... The effect is balanced out. Seems great for me.. OCG is pretty good IMO. 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wuu. Posted March 24, 2010 Report Share Posted March 24, 2010 This card inflicts Piercing Damage.??i don't have any ting about it?what's for?? It means it snipes your opponent trough the head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted March 24, 2010 Report Share Posted March 24, 2010 Overpowered. It's fairly easy to Summon, and it doubles any Battle Damage dealt, AND if you happen to pierce 2500 or more damage, automatic hand destruction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted March 24, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 24, 2010 Thanks for the rates. Made harder to summon by making fusion materials Tributers, and added self-destructive effect if the hand destruction effect kicks in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted March 26, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 Bump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted March 27, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 27, 2010 Comment please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted March 30, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 30, 2010 Bump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dandorian Posted March 30, 2010 Report Share Posted March 30, 2010 i haven't seen "This card inflicts Piercing Damage" on any yugioh card in real life. at least not yet. so it seems like ocg error to me but that's only because i haven't seen it in any real card.i haven't seen "This card inflicts Piercing Damage" on any real card yet. is that really proper ocg with yugioh cards? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darj Posted March 30, 2010 Report Share Posted March 30, 2010 The format if wrong. Using 5 Headed Dragon as example, the first effect should be:"This card can only be Fusion Summoned by sending 2 Level 5 or higher DARK Machine-Type monsters you control to the Graveyard (You don’t use “Polymerization”)." The materials and the summoning conditions are mixed in a single sentence. I don't understand the second effect: It lets you pay 1500 Life Points to Special Summon it, but from where? The Graveyard? That would be OP'ed. Or maybe you meant that you pay 1500 LP when it is Special Summoned? The rest of the effect seems fine to me. I think it will rarely inflict more than 2400 of damage, anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted March 30, 2010 Report Share Posted March 30, 2010 Nice card, I'm pretty shure this would be limited, but still good card.OCG is fine.Pic is good.A 9/10, Fusions Forever! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted March 30, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 30, 2010 i haven't seen "This card inflicts Piercing Damage" on any real card yet. is that really proper ocg with yugioh cards? One of the "Cyberdark" monsters uses it. It was prototype OCG to replace the lengthy 'When this card attacks a Defense Position...' The format is wrong. Using 5 Headed Dragon as example' date=' the first effect should be:"This card can only be Fusion Summoned by sending 2 Level 5 or higher DARK Machine-Type monsters you control to the Graveyard (You don’t use “Polymerization”)." The materials and the summoning conditions are mixed in a single sentence.[/quote'] See "Elemental Hero Air Neos". I don't understand the second effect: It lets you pay 1500 Life Points to Special Summon it' date=' but from where? The Graveyard? That would be OP'ed. Or maybe you meant that you pay 1500 LP when it is Special Summoned?[/quote'] Whenever you Special Summon it, except when you Fusion Summon it; so from the Graveyard, RFP Zone or a non-Fusion Special Summon from the Extra Deck. The rest of the effect seems fine to me. I think it will rarely inflict more than 2400 of damage' date=' anyways.[/quote'] It's probably still enough to warrant it being Limited. Nice card' date=' I'm pretty shure this would be limited, but still good card.OCG is fine.Pic is good.A 9/10, Fusions Forever![/quote'] Thanks. Effect changed slightly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted March 31, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 31, 2010 Bump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Marluxia~ Posted March 31, 2010 Report Share Posted March 31, 2010 Cool. 9.8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darj Posted March 31, 2010 Report Share Posted March 31, 2010 The format is wrong. Using 5 Headed Dragon as example' date=' the first effect should be:"This card can only be Fusion Summoned by sending 2 Level 5 or higher DARK Machine-Type monsters you control to the Graveyard (You don’t use “Polymerization”)." The materials and the summoning conditions are mixed in a single sentence.[/quote'] See "Elemental Hero Air Neos". I saw it. So, as you may notice, Fusions have the "This card can only be Special Summoned from your Extra Deck by returning the above cards you control to the Deck." condition when at least 1 of their materials is SPECIFIC. In your card both materials are not specific, so you could use a similar format to "Five-Headed Dragon", whose materials are any 5 Dragons. But as you have it's ok and understandable, it is only longer. And now that you cleared the 1500 Life Point cost issue, I must tell you that the effect is misleading; I believe it should be like this: "If this card is Special Summoned, except by Fusion Summon, you must pay 1500 Life Points" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted March 31, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 31, 2010 Effect modified a little. Changed some of the wording. I'm not sure what's wrong with non-specific fusion materials being referred to though. Think about it; it's obvious that the card is referring to its fusion materials, regardless of what they are. I'm sure someone can tell if they have two monsters that are Level 5 or higher DARK Machine-Types. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jorobi89 Posted March 31, 2010 Report Share Posted March 31, 2010 wow, very good work, art is good. I dont see and OCG errors... i like it, if this card came out i would be sure to make a dark machine deck to use it properly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T3RA PROWL3R Posted March 31, 2010 Report Share Posted March 31, 2010 @ what Rag said in the first post, you could make it so this card can't be summoned if there is a Continuous Trap Card on the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sub-Zero999 Posted March 31, 2010 Report Share Posted March 31, 2010 i don't even know how to describe this card. its worse than my cardsim just talking about the effects Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted March 31, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 31, 2010 @ T3RA: Problem is, "Reactor" and Dark Machine Decks, who this is designed for, make heavy use of "Ultimate Offering" to get their most powerful monsters on the field. So their very strategy would render this card unsummonable. Also, since it's not a Synchro, it isn't as splashable, so would only be used in Machine-Type Decks, themselves usually based on a large number of DARK monsters. Also, if your opponent has a different Continuous Trap out, you wouldn't be able to summon this card, rendering you weaker than before. Rag's comment was made before the numerous changes were made. Back then, it only needed Level 4 or higher monsters, and didn't destroy itself. Since you need to tribute the fusion materials (since it's fused from the field), you need to pay considerable Life Points to Special Summon and if it does any serious damage it blows itself up, I think a restrictive summoning condition like the one you propose would make it underpowered, something it can't afford to be. @ Waterboy: A reason would allow me to take you seriously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted April 1, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 Bump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.