-DG- Posted March 17, 2010 Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 Proper CnC Pl0x. The more helpful CnC gets reps. The -even worse- V2: .. I'm ashamed... I am still working on V2. It MAY be better eventually.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'tyleR Posted March 17, 2010 Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 Not like your old ones were that good. :P It's terribly monotone and the depth was a failed attempt. You stuff too many effects over the focal to really make proper depth. There are two possible lighting spots, but you really only attempted one, while the other has no explanation for the light over the focal. The effects are random have no real composition. Pretty low quality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seta Posted March 17, 2010 Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 Not like your old ones were that good. :P It's terribly monotone and the depth was a failed attempt. You stuff too many effects over the focal to really make proper depth. There are two possible lighting spots' date=' but you really only attempted one, while the other has no explanation for the light over the focal. The effects are random have no real composition. Pretty low quality.[/quote'] + the colors are quite monotone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted March 17, 2010 Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 And, no offense, it takes a lot to make it worse than your old ones =P They were'nt good either. Anyways, the first thing I hate is the way you blurred the FX in the BG (the bubbles). For more info, see Rains post =P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DG- Posted March 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 See? It's bad. I told you.On the BG, It was a sad depth attempt... As for the monotone-ness, I tried to make the render blend w/ the BG.. didn't exactly work..Not like your old ones were that good. :P It's terribly monotone and the depth was a failed attempt. You stuff too many effects over the focal to really make proper depth. There are two possible lighting spots' date=' but you really only attempted one, while the other has no explanation for the light over the focal. The effects are random have no real composition. Pretty low quality.[/quote'] my point exactly... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted March 17, 2010 Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 Do please stop multi-posting... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DG- Posted March 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 I am. I just was posting individually for each different post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted March 17, 2010 Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 Edit the freaking post instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DG- Posted March 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 I will next time. I was just in a hurry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.