burnpsy Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 You couldn't have possibly actually stopped to think about it for more than 4 minutes upon having conducted your post. I'm actually not trolling for real because this is a reasonable ideal and would benefit the game by evening the balance of power throughout the levels and allow for correct proportions upon further releases. You guys just can't accept it because it seems ridiculous because of all the cards you know and love/laugh at would be banned' date=' but it actually makes sense. Prove me wrong or agree.[/quote'] You're the one making the point. You have to prove your own assumption about what I think. Clearly impossible as you're not a professional psychologist. So yeah, the last two sentences are stupid assumptions. Also, bolded is a logic fail. You posted the idea more than an hour ago. Why else can't you accept it? Seems like a logical explanation about why you're being so defensive about the point here. Or rather, as to why you're being so defensive in making issues around the statements I make about the point here which don't actually relate to the point here. You're evading the main point and scrapping with me on semantic issues because you've nothing to say about the main point. Or haven't demonstrated having said anything about the main point anyway. Care to say something about the main point after having thought about it for over an hour now? (I could just as easily have thought you were responding to my post and not the main point, Mr. Psychologist. ;)) I have already stated my opinion on this subject on the previous page, you conveniently skipped it. It sums up everything I have to say on the matter. In short, even with what you want banned banned, I can think of several non-broken cards that would outclass things with difficult summoning conditions. If something is outclassed, it usually becomes nigh-unplayable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OrangePeel Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 ~ P O L A R I S ~ I would love to see a deck made with a ban-list suited to the logic that 1 4 1 card like Dimensional Prison are deemed overpowered and banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b0b3rt Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 Polaris, your point makes sense if you get rid of any and all cards that can potentially be +0s. You'd be getting rid of the entire meta, tier 1.5, tier 2, and half of everything else. It might work, but it definitely wouldn't be the same game it is today (maybe a game similar to the one before IOC was released). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 ITT: High ATK monsters should be almost impossible to get rid of and we should have a meta based around beatsticks rather than effects, because effects are banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daboss144 Posted March 5, 2010 Report Share Posted March 5, 2010 Wait' date=' by that logic, Trap Hole should be banned? It invalidates all Normal Summons, which POTENTIALLY means a high lvl monster... BAN ALL 1-4-1!!! <<[/quote'] WAIT A MINUTE!!!!!!! IT ONLY INVALIDATES NORMAL SUMMONS OF MONSTERS WITH 1000 ATK OR OVER!!!!! THIS MEANS IT CAN BE PUT AT 1!!!! BUT IT'S BROKEN!!! AAAAHHHH!!! OT: D-Prison is by far the most useful single attack negater other than magic cyllinder. Because Magic Cyllinder is a boss. /magic cyllinder sarcasm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.